From: Andi K. <an...@fi...> - 2009-05-08 18:34:11
|
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 01:00:03PM -0400, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 05:36:21PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > -event:0xc0 counters:cpuid um:zero minimum:6000 filter:1 name:INST_RETIRED_ANY_P : number of instructions retired > > +event:0xc0 counters:cpuid um:one minimum:6000 filter:1 name:INST_RETIRED : number of instructions retired > > We can get away with this before 1.0, but after that, we'd need to > introduce rules over legacy naming: we can't break people's scripts. INST_RETIRED_ANY_P was never in a release, just in CVS. -Andi -- ak...@li... -- Speaking for myself only. |