Re: Oprofile Greyhound (Barcelona) Patch

[William C. <wc...@re...>]

Jason Yeh wrote:
> Upon farther testing, I found a unit mask with invalid masks. The 
> attached patch includes correction to the error.
> 
> Jason

Hi Jason,

The patch is looking okay. So x86-64/family10 is what the processor is going to 
be identified as? That "family10" isn't the most graceful name. That isn't going 
to change in the future is it?

I have been able to build an Fedora development OProfile RPM with the revised 
OPROFILE_Family10v.patch.

Are there any other changes or corrects that need to be made in the patch? Or 
should it be put in the oprofile cvs?

-Will