From: Matt H. <mat...@us...> - 2006-06-14 01:24:51
|
On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 19:59 -0500, Chase Venters wrote: > On Tuesday 13 June 2006 18:54, Matt Helsley wrote: > > > switch (type) { > > - case PROFILE_TASK_EXIT: > > - err = blocking_notifier_chain_register( > > - &task_exit_notifier, n); > > - break; > > case PROFILE_MUNMAP: > > err = blocking_notifier_chain_register( > > &munmap_notifier, n); > > break; > > } > > if (type == PROFILE_MUNMAP) > > ? > > > @@ -140,14 +130,10 @@ int profile_event_register(enum profile_ > > int profile_event_unregister(enum profile_type type, struct notifier_block > > * n) { > > int err = -EINVAL; > > > > switch (type) { > > - case PROFILE_TASK_EXIT: > > - err = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister( > > - &task_exit_notifier, n); > > - break; > > case PROFILE_MUNMAP: > > err = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister( > > &munmap_notifier, n); > > break; > > } > > Same... > > Thanks, > Chase Hmm. Perhaps I ought to get rid of the condition and enum entirely then change the names of the functions to profile_mmmap() and profile_munmap(). It really depends on what additional changes, if any, are expected here. Since I don't have any plans to further modify profiling beyond what I've outlined in these patches I'm not sure what the best course is here. Thanks, -Matt Helsley |