From: Philippe E. <ph...@wa...> - 2005-03-23 19:51:17
|
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 at 20:58 +0000, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 10:20:34AM -0600, Rob Fowler wrote: > > > Regardless of the ultimate scheme for reporting time, transitions > > in performance state will be valuable performance metrics in themselves > > and should be profileable. > > This is true, but somewhat of a side issue. There are lots of > interesting events we could and maybe should be providing support for. > The big issue is "how do I get reliable profiles on my laptop", and I > agree with Will we need to look at providing a synthetic event keyed to > clock frequency for this problem. > > It will also give us the nice side effect of having an immediately > understandable event that can be programmed as "interrupt every x > microseconds" or whatever. We can't do that through something based on HW events except a timer interrupt clocked independantly. This already exists : it's called timer int, rate is not variable but who care. Trying to key to clock frequency something already keyed to another HW event look like a non-sense. Philippe Elie |