|
From: Eric J. W. <ew...@pa...> - 2004-07-28 23:33:24
|
Dear Nichols, There is support for the DNL PP approach. The DNL can be constructed and tested, but only written in the .pwf format. Other formats (such as those for abinit or pwscf) will take a little hacking to prepare. Currently Opium does not construct TM potentials, and I am not aware of any references which do a direct comparison of optimized and TM. I think, though, you will find, in general that even without the DNL approach, optimized pseudopotentials are softer than TM while with similar transferability properties. Others on the list may wish to comment though. Sincerely, Eric J. Walter On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 02:18:37PM -0500, Nichols A. Romero wrote: > Hi, > > I have several question regarding the pseudopotentials (PP) supported by > OPIUM. > > Question #1 > ------------ > Your web page states at > http://opium.sourceforge.net/menu_about.html > that OPIUM generates OPT PP described in PRB 41, 1227 (1990). > > Is there any support for the DNL PP described in PRB 59, 12471 (1999)? > > Question #2 > ----------- > The SIESTA LCAO DFT code uses the PP generated by the ATOM program > http://bohr.inesc-mn.pt/~jlm/pseudo.html > > Can OPIUM generate TM PP pseudopotential? > > Question #3 > ----------- > The papers I've read so far compare OPT PP with mostly the HSC PP. Are > the any papers which computer OPT and the TM PP? > > Bests, > -- > Nichols A. Romero > > 4-133 ESB, MC 704 508 East Michigan Avenue > 1110 West Green Street Apartment 12 > Urbana, IL 61801-3080 Urbana, IL 61801-5176 > (217) 333-6108 (217) 417-5210 > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Opium-talk mailing list > Opi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opium-talk |