From: Tom F. <tf...@us...> - 2002-12-13 04:02:32
|
Braden McDaniel wrote: >I'm gonna release 0.13.0. > >Soon. > >Real soon. > >Seriously. > >No, really. I mean it. > Woohoo! ><snip> > >I've done various refactoring and there have been minor bug fixes beside >the above, but I usually just lump that stuff together in a single NEWS >file entry. Are there any other significant changes that stand on their >own? > If it wasn't for that bug in gcj and the Sun JDK issues, we would've added a (nearly) fully functional JSAI binding. :-( Hopefully before the next dot release a new gcc dotload will be released with our required JNI fixes. >Tom, where are we with the conformance table? How up-to-date is it? > I've actually been updating it over the last couple of weeks. Getting there...I'll check in what I have by the end of the weekend. OpenVRML has definitely improved in terms of conformance with this release (mainly due to the Text support changes) but it looks like FreeWRL might actually have passed us in the last couple of months as they've made unbelievable progress (been running them through the tests as well). Hopefully we can jump back ahead before the next release! >I'm gonna try to fix bug 210070 before the release. But I might not. Is >there anything that anyone thinks is critical to fix before 0.13.0? >We'll of course have subsequent 0.13.x releases to fix things that don't >break the API; but I expect a pretty long stretch before 0.14. > >Oh, and I'm planning to build Red Hat 8.0 RPMs for this release. > > Cool. So does that mean we're ready to start hosting RPMs for the *lookats as well? GtkLookat and XmLookat are both ready to be released with 0.13.0 and I can build the RPMs as well pretty quickly. BTW, the File->Open problems present in the previous version of the viewers should be fixed now. Tom |