|
From: Jochen B. <Joc...@bi...> - 2023-07-30 14:43:44
|
On 30.07.23 12:54, Jason Long via Openvpn-users wrote: > On Sunday, July 30, 2023 at 02:12:06 PM GMT+3:30, Gert Doering <ge...@gr...> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 10:09:33AM +0000, Jason Long via Openvpn-users wrote: >> 172.20.1.0 via 10.8.0.0 device tun >> 172.20.50.0 via 10.8.0.0 device tun >> >> Wherever that came from, it's not a valid OpenVPN syntax. >> (It looks like arguments to "ip route add ...") I'm pretty sure that /sbin/ip will not know of an interface called "tun", either. (It might insist on being explicitly told what subnet mask to use, too.) > Can you tell me how can I correct it? "Valid syntaxes: route network/IP route network/IP netmask route network/IP netmask gateway route network/IP netmask gateway metric" -- https://openvpn.net/community-resources/reference-manual-for-openvpn-2-6/#client-options Not that your client would *need* those routes configured, as the server is already set up (with proper syntax) to "push" them to all clients. Kind regards, -- Jochen Bern Systemingenieur Binect GmbH |