|
From: Erich T. <eri...@th...> - 2009-01-29 13:53:02
|
Ove Everlid wrote: > On 01/29/2009 01:07 PM, Jan Just Keijser wrote: >> Hi Jonathan, >> ... > > Seems to me that many years ago TUN and TAP had different feature sets. > Today features has been added to be able to do all with either TUN or > TAP. Do you agree with this? > > E.g., such things a iroute to carve out subnets in TAP and expose them > to routing. > > When you say "error-prone" are you referring to experience with bugs in > openvpn or just issues with the extra complexity and scope of doing > things at layer2 rather then layer3? > > Thanks for the comment about TAP having a higher frame overhead. It is probably not so much the frame overhead but the chattiness of a LAN that is relevant. I would never want to have all Ethernet traffic to go across a WAN line. cheers Erich |