|
From: Erich T. <eri...@th...> - 2008-02-29 07:17:06
|
Hi Josh josh wrote: > Hi. :. > We thought about using a VIP on the front end served up via CARP, then > running ripng on the back end for announcing the routes into the Cisco > environment, but I am open to suggestions. > > Another option is to just split the clients, pointing half and one T1000 > and the other half at another, but then the problem is if you lose one > of them, you have to either assign a secondary IP to the "live" and make > manual route changes. > > I know that you can use the "remote-random" feature to alternate between > several vpn servers, but that does not address the issue of determining > from the internal networks which T1000 one would use to get back to the > VPN client. (this is a site-to-site VPN scenario) Why can't you just NAT the VPN traffic on the two endpoints? Erich |