From: John C. <joh...@un...> - 2007-10-31 11:03:43
|
> > I'm sure many of you will be familiar with my emails in the past, I am > > unhappy about the current dispersed and non integrated fashion with > > which this functionality is being developed. but I want to talk about > > it in the context of ubuntu. > > No, I'm not - could you point to your mails about those topics? Hi Daniel. I guess he means the emails we discussed in #opensync. They are available here as "Hardy: Time for sync project focus...": https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-discuss/2007-September/thread.html > > So if you have any issues you want me to bring up; or your attending > > and would like to take part. please do reply and register on the > > blueprint as required. > > Is there any plan to support the development of OpenSync by providing some > people to actually develop on OpenSync Core and the OpenSync core plugins or > even on libsyncml? Currently I only hear that everyone is planning to use > OpenSync, but everyone just wait until OpenSync is "ready". I don't want to > sound rude ... but the development ressource of OpenSync are very limited and > could need some more people which help on hacking on OpenSync and solve > complex tasks. I already spent 110% of my spare time on OpenSync development, > but thats seems to be not enough... and no! OpenSync is not part of my > regular work. > > Not quite sure how you involved into Ubuntu, but could you fix Ubuntu Gusty > and upgrade to libsyncml 0.4.2 at least? libsyncml 0.4.1 is broken and year > old - and currently i get overloaded with user request from Ubuntu Gusty > users which can't sync because Gusty got shipped with libnsymcl 0.4.1. If > version update isn't acceptable - could you at least apply: > > http://libsyncml.opensync.org/changset/204 > > best regards, > Daniel |