opensipstack-osbcdevel Mailing List for OpenSIPStack (Page 25)
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
Menu
▾
▴
opensipstack-osbcdevel — Discussions on OpenSBC
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(92) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(84) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-25 18:27:28
|
Hi HTH
In the Manual it allueds to B2Bua UpperRegistration as ideal if you are
using several OSBC. Is this the door way between OSBC and Could you also
use Relay Route?
In a situation where you have the 1st OSBC x.x.x.239 used only for phone
registrations and NO B2Bua or Relay Route configured.
A phone configured it's Sip Server == sipX x.x.x.240 and OutBoundProxy=2nd
OSBC x.x.x.239.
Here are some possiblities: A Call coming from a Telco/PSTN/ITSP or a Call
from the Internet going to a Telco/PSTN/ITSP. All are DID's (10 digits) and
all DID are surplied to us by the Telco/PSTN/ITSP == x.x.x.190.
The call from the Internet first:
Pick up phone and dial, it should contacts the OSBC/OutBoundProry == OBP ==
ipaddr is x.x.x.239 and it's B2BuaUpperRegistraion to pointing to the SIP
Server == sipX's == x.x.x.240 Dial plan gateway which is pointing to the 2nd
OSBC x.x.x.24 and Telco/PSTN/ITSP: x.x.x.190
sipX dial plan and the sip packets are directed to a the sipx Sip
Trunk/Gateway passing x.x.x.190/x.x.x.241 the 2nd OSBC box which may or may
not be using the new Sip Trunk route Feature.
The call from the Telco/PSTN/ITSP: x.x.x.190 sends the Sip Packet to
x.x.x.241
But the phone number is not known to it's registration because it did not
register the phone. The 1st OSBC x.x.x.239 did. So How does the 2nd OSBC
deal with the phone that was registered on the 1st OSBC?
Warren Kreckler
----- Original Message -----
From: "ehernaez" <ope...@op...>
To: <ope...@li...>
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] Peering Edge or Access Edge SBC's
> {noformat}Warren,
>
> Yes, you are correct in concluding that you would need two OSBC
> instances in the scenario you laid out. The instance that you use for
> SIP trunking to face your ITSP should not be the same instance that you
> are using for NAT traversal of SIP UAs using upper registration to SIPX.
>
> In fact, it may even be necessary for you to have 3 instances of OSBC if
> you need to support DID providers that do not comply with SIP REFER.
> As you may know, calls transferred from the SIPX auto-attendant are
> referred to the relevant UA. Since many ITSP do not honor the REFER
> message, we have found it necessary to run a dedicated OSBC instance as
> a media anchor to shield the ITSP from the referred calls.
>
>
> HTH{noformat}
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>
|
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-25 17:12:25
|
Hi
Main Trunk and SIP Trunk can't have the same ipaddress:port according to the
web admin OSBC Transport Status log. In the the General Parameter i have
set the interface to the first Active NIC ipaddress:port x.x.x.241:5060 (box
with two NIC) this also disables as far as OSBC is concerned the Main Trunks
localhost 127.0.0.1 address
Main Trunk x.x.x.241:5060
SIP Trunk x.x.x.241:5060 error already in uses x.x.x.241:5060
What should i do to remove this confick?
If i change the Main Trunk's port to 9000 would this screw up Sip transport?
And what else would i need to change to get this to work?
Warren Kreckler
----- Original Message -----
From: "ehernaez" <ope...@op...>
To: <ope...@li...>
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] Peering Edge or Access Edge SBC's
> {noformat}Warren,
>
> Yes, you are correct in concluding that you would need two OSBC
> instances in the scenario you laid out. The instance that you use for
> SIP trunking to face your ITSP should not be the same instance that you
> are using for NAT traversal of SIP UAs using upper registration to SIPX.
>
> In fact, it may even be necessary for you to have 3 instances of OSBC if
> you need to support DID providers that do not comply with SIP REFER.
> As you may know, calls transferred from the SIPX auto-attendant are
> referred to the relevant UA. Since many ITSP do not honor the REFER
> message, we have found it necessary to run a dedicated OSBC instance as
> a media anchor to shield the ITSP from the referred calls.
>
>
> HTH{noformat}
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>
|
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-25 16:47:14
|
Hi HTH
Could you publish your sipx network design. Just the top level if this is
to much to ask?
I am about to set up a third OSBC. Obvious to say can't find a howto for
this magic.
Warren Kreckler
----- Original Message -----
From: "ehernaez" <ope...@op...>
To: <ope...@li...>
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] Peering Edge or Access Edge SBC's
> {noformat}Warren,
>
> Yes, you are correct in concluding that you would need two OSBC
> instances in the scenario you laid out. The instance that you use for
> SIP trunking to face your ITSP should not be the same instance that you
> are using for NAT traversal of SIP UAs using upper registration to SIPX.
>
> In fact, it may even be necessary for you to have 3 instances of OSBC if
> you need to support DID providers that do not comply with SIP REFER.
> As you may know, calls transferred from the SIPX auto-attendant are
> referred to the relevant UA. Since many ITSP do not honor the REFER
> message, we have found it necessary to run a dedicated OSBC instance as
> a media anchor to shield the ITSP from the referred calls.
>
>
> HTH{noformat}
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>
|
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-25 04:55:34
|
Merry Christmas Thank you I started putting a second one together this morning just for registra of phones. Do these SBC need to be aware of each other in some combination? Warren Kreckler ----- Original Message ----- From: "eric hernaez" <er...@so...> To: <ope...@li...> Sent: Monday, December 24, 2007 3:55 PM Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] Peering Edge or Access Edge SBC's > Warren, > > Yes, you are correct in concluding that you would need two OSBC > instances in the scenario you laid out. The instance that you use for > SIP trunking to face your ITSP should not be the same instance that you > are using for NAT traversal of SIP UAs using upper registration to SIPX. > > In fact, it may even be necessary for you to have 3 instances of OSBC if > you need to support DID providers that do not comply with SIP REFER. > As you may know, calls transferred from the SIPX auto-attendant are > referred to the relevant UA. Since many ITSP do not honor the REFER > message, we have found it necessary to run a dedicated OSBC instance as > a media anchor to shield the ITSP from the referred calls. > > > HTH > > > sales@ER wrote: > > Hi All > > > > I'm stilll fairly new to SBC thinking and came across and publication that > > is making the distrinction. > > > > Is openSBC following in the foot steps of Peering Edge or Access Edge SBC's. > > > > Further, asking because i have run into a situation that make me think i may > > in fact need two SBC's to get sipX to work. > > > > One SBC to register phones (sipX side) and the Second SBC to deal with > > (ITSPside Peering) because using one (1) SBC i can register phones using > > B2BuaUpperRegistration but refuses to allow outbound calls. SBC keeps > > routing calls back to the sipX. > > > > Has anyone run into this problem? Has anyone try setting up two (2) SBC's > > in the fashion i am suggesting? > > > > Warren Kreckler > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > > Ope...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > |
|
From: ehernaez <ope...@op...> - 2007-12-24 21:55:07
|
{noformat}Warren,
Yes, you are correct in concluding that you would need two OSBC
instances in the scenario you laid out. The instance that you use for
SIP trunking to face your ITSP should not be the same instance that you
are using for NAT traversal of SIP UAs using upper registration to SIPX.
In fact, it may even be necessary for you to have 3 instances of OSBC if
you need to support DID providers that do not comply with SIP REFER.
As you may know, calls transferred from the SIPX auto-attendant are
referred to the relevant UA. Since many ITSP do not honor the REFER
message, we have found it necessary to run a dedicated OSBC instance as
a media anchor to shield the ITSP from the referred calls.
HTH{noformat}
|
|
From: eric h. <er...@so...> - 2007-12-24 21:50:12
|
Warren, Yes, you are correct in concluding that you would need two OSBC instances in the scenario you laid out. The instance that you use for SIP trunking to face your ITSP should not be the same instance that you are using for NAT traversal of SIP UAs using upper registration to SIPX. In fact, it may even be necessary for you to have 3 instances of OSBC if you need to support DID providers that do not comply with SIP REFER. As you may know, calls transferred from the SIPX auto-attendant are referred to the relevant UA. Since many ITSP do not honor the REFER message, we have found it necessary to run a dedicated OSBC instance as a media anchor to shield the ITSP from the referred calls. HTH sales@ER wrote: > Hi All > > I'm stilll fairly new to SBC thinking and came across and publication that > is making the distrinction. > > Is openSBC following in the foot steps of Peering Edge or Access Edge SBC's. > > Further, asking because i have run into a situation that make me think i may > in fact need two SBC's to get sipX to work. > > One SBC to register phones (sipX side) and the Second SBC to deal with > (ITSPside Peering) because using one (1) SBC i can register phones using > B2BuaUpperRegistration but refuses to allow outbound calls. SBC keeps > routing calls back to the sipX. > > Has anyone run into this problem? Has anyone try setting up two (2) SBC's > in the fashion i am suggesting? > > Warren Kreckler > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > |
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-24 16:55:37
|
Hi Joegen
In SBCCallHandler::SBCCallHandler.cxx
In Method == void SBCCallHandler::OnOutgoingCall()
/// check if we are suppose to use the sip trunk
B2BRoutingInterface::B2BRouteList routeList = connection.GetRoutes();
if( routeList.GetSize() > 0 )
{
This does not exist == ***** B2BRoutingInterface::B2BRouteList **** !!
Where is it in lastest CVS?
Warren Kreckler
|
|
From: Chris V. <chr...@gm...> - 2007-12-23 00:26:41
|
And how did CALEA get in this thread? |
|
From: Chris V. <chr...@gm...> - 2007-12-23 00:25:58
|
I perform ulimit -n 32000 prior to the OpenSBC restart and the same issues occur . I think that is the file handlers described in the OSBC manual. You reference rlimit? Where would the core files be located if a core dump happens? |
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-22 19:01:23
|
Hi All I'm stilll fairly new to SBC thinking and came across and publication that is making the distrinction. Is openSBC following in the foot steps of Peering Edge or Access Edge SBC's. Further, asking because i have run into a situation that make me think i may in fact need two SBC's to get sipX to work. One SBC to register phones (sipX side) and the Second SBC to deal with (ITSPside Peering) because using one (1) SBC i can register phones using B2BuaUpperRegistration but refuses to allow outbound calls. SBC keeps routing calls back to the sipX. Has anyone run into this problem? Has anyone try setting up two (2) SBC's in the fashion i am suggesting? Warren Kreckler |
|
From: Bill S. <b.s...@da...> - 2007-12-21 13:29:39
|
I want to make note that I first started with the windows zip download. I changed to the CVS downloads after reading more about the app. The tray app isn't active in the CVS version. Thanks again, Bill |
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-21 06:00:55
|
Hi Joegen I put tracing code into SBCCallHandling.cxx in the OnOutgoingCalls and the if (routeList.GetSize) is never entered even thought have Sip Trunk Config set with and xml file. In the Web admin/ sip trunk registration is empty and the B2Bua has a route with sip-trunk=true being used. I noted this behavior over the last 48 hr. but this was working all week It began happening about 15 reboots ago. I laught at the way i messure time. Is there some flag or something that is not getting cleared. One point maybe of interest and don't know if it's related. When i originally installed the OSBC i had two active NIC running and later shut down one permently because i down need private access to sipX because OSBC and sipX both are now in the public ip space. Could this somehow causing a routing problem for SiP Trunking? Warren Kreckler |
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-21 05:45:39
|
Hi Joegen There are two files in the registry after i reboot the OSBC box and confirmed by the log. When i reboot the box and look at the registration from the web admin it only displays the last item and not both. I have to power down and up the phone for the registration page to show both. Even thought the first one come up in web admin any attempts to make an inbound call fails until i reboot the phone and after the web admin displays both lines. I think registration hi-jacking record in the registry folder is not working on a reboot. Warren Kreckler ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joegen E. Baclor" <joe...@gm...> To: <ope...@li...> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 7:41 PM Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] Contact Recover ??? > This is a feature in OpenSBC that remembers previous registrations that > were active before it was shutdown either through a restart or a > crash. The cash folder is in opensbc_dir/registry. > > sales@ER wrote: > > Hi Joegen > > > > I am seeing **** Contact Recovery ***** at the top of a brand new log. I > > have not seen this before in pass logs. What does this mean and what could > > cause it? > > > > Warren Kreckler > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > > Ope...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-12-21 03:17:57
|
Also include the configure script output for OpenSIPStack Joegen E. Baclor wrote: > Our production environment are mostly solaris 10 boxes so I'm sure it > should compile in Solaris. Can you stream your entire build output in a > text file and send it to me offlist? > > Joegen > > Jack Damn wrote: > >> Yes, >> Package SUNWgccruntime installs /usr/sfw/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 >> amongst others. >> Any other idea ? It compiles fine on Linux I suppose ? >> Maybe another include file is missing for solaris platform to define >> stl maps types ? >> >> Thanks >> >> On Dec 20, 2007 8:44 PM, Joegen E. Baclor <joe...@gm...> wrote: >> >> >>> The offending code is referring to standard STL maps. Do you have >>> libstdc++ installed? >>> >>> Jack Damn wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Changes to B2BUAConnection.h in revision 1.70 is giving me following >>>> errors when compiling CVS opensbc: >>>> (Solaris 10 with GCC 3.4.3 from Sun). Please help, had no issues before. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> -JD >>>> >>>> ####################################################### >>>> >>>> gmake optnoshared >>>> >>>> gmake P_SHAREDLIB=0 opt >>>> gmake[1]: Entering directory `/d65/src/opensbc' >>>> g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -DP_USE_PRAGMA >>>> -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include >>>> -DPTRACING -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include -O3 -DSOLARIS -c Main.cxx >>>> -o obj_solaris_sparc_r/Main.o >>>> g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -DP_USE_PRAGMA >>>> -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include >>>> -DPTRACING -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include -O3 -DSOLARIS -c >>>> SBCCallHandler.cxx -o obj_solaris_sparc_r/SBCCallHandler.o >>>> In file included from RouteRecord.h:86, >>>> from Router.h:124, >>>> from SBCRoutingHandler.h:127, >>>> from SBCCallHandler.cxx:123: >>>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:795: error: ISO C++ >>>> forbids declaration of `map' with no type >>>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:795: error: expected >>>> `;' before '<' token >>>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h: In member function >>>> `void B2BUA::B2BUAConnection::AddMergedBranch(const std::string&, >>>> const std::string&)': >>>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:771: error: >>>> `m_MergedBranch' undeclared (first use this function) >>>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:771: error: (Each >>>> undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it >>>> appears in.) >>>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h: In member function >>>> `BOOL B2BUA::B2BUAConnection::IsMergedBranch(const std::string&, >>>> std::string&)': >>>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:777: error: expected >>>> primary-expression before "const" >>>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:777: error: expected >>>> `;' before "const" >>>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:778: error: `it' >>>> undeclared (first use this function) >>>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:778: error: >>>> `m_MergedBranch' undeclared (first use this function) >>>> gmake[1]: *** [obj_solaris_sparc_r/SBCCallHandler.o] Error 1 >>>> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/d65/src/opensbc' >>>> gmake: *** [optnoshared] Error 2 >>>> ####################################################### >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >>>> Ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >>> Ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-12-21 03:10:45
|
Our production environment are mostly solaris 10 boxes so I'm sure it should compile in Solaris. Can you stream your entire build output in a text file and send it to me offlist? Joegen Jack Damn wrote: > Yes, > Package SUNWgccruntime installs /usr/sfw/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 > amongst others. > Any other idea ? It compiles fine on Linux I suppose ? > Maybe another include file is missing for solaris platform to define > stl maps types ? > > Thanks > > On Dec 20, 2007 8:44 PM, Joegen E. Baclor <joe...@gm...> wrote: > >> The offending code is referring to standard STL maps. Do you have >> libstdc++ installed? >> >> Jack Damn wrote: >> >>> Changes to B2BUAConnection.h in revision 1.70 is giving me following >>> errors when compiling CVS opensbc: >>> (Solaris 10 with GCC 3.4.3 from Sun). Please help, had no issues before. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> -JD >>> >>> ####################################################### >>> >>> gmake optnoshared >>> >>> gmake P_SHAREDLIB=0 opt >>> gmake[1]: Entering directory `/d65/src/opensbc' >>> g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -DP_USE_PRAGMA >>> -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include >>> -DPTRACING -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include -O3 -DSOLARIS -c Main.cxx >>> -o obj_solaris_sparc_r/Main.o >>> g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -DP_USE_PRAGMA >>> -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include >>> -DPTRACING -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include -O3 -DSOLARIS -c >>> SBCCallHandler.cxx -o obj_solaris_sparc_r/SBCCallHandler.o >>> In file included from RouteRecord.h:86, >>> from Router.h:124, >>> from SBCRoutingHandler.h:127, >>> from SBCCallHandler.cxx:123: >>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:795: error: ISO C++ >>> forbids declaration of `map' with no type >>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:795: error: expected >>> `;' before '<' token >>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h: In member function >>> `void B2BUA::B2BUAConnection::AddMergedBranch(const std::string&, >>> const std::string&)': >>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:771: error: >>> `m_MergedBranch' undeclared (first use this function) >>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:771: error: (Each >>> undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it >>> appears in.) >>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h: In member function >>> `BOOL B2BUA::B2BUAConnection::IsMergedBranch(const std::string&, >>> std::string&)': >>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:777: error: expected >>> primary-expression before "const" >>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:777: error: expected >>> `;' before "const" >>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:778: error: `it' >>> undeclared (first use this function) >>> /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:778: error: >>> `m_MergedBranch' undeclared (first use this function) >>> gmake[1]: *** [obj_solaris_sparc_r/SBCCallHandler.o] Error 1 >>> gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/d65/src/opensbc' >>> gmake: *** [optnoshared] Error 2 >>> ####################################################### >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >>> Ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >>> >>> >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >> >> > > > |
|
From: Jack D. <455...@gm...> - 2007-12-21 02:50:09
|
Yes, Package SUNWgccruntime installs /usr/sfw/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.3 amongst others. Any other idea ? It compiles fine on Linux I suppose ? Maybe another include file is missing for solaris platform to define stl maps types ? Thanks On Dec 20, 2007 8:44 PM, Joegen E. Baclor <joe...@gm...> wrote: > The offending code is referring to standard STL maps. Do you have > libstdc++ installed? > > Jack Damn wrote: > > Changes to B2BUAConnection.h in revision 1.70 is giving me following > > errors when compiling CVS opensbc: > > (Solaris 10 with GCC 3.4.3 from Sun). Please help, had no issues before. > > > > Thanks. > > -JD > > > > ####################################################### > > > > gmake optnoshared > > > > gmake P_SHAREDLIB=0 opt > > gmake[1]: Entering directory `/d65/src/opensbc' > > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -DP_USE_PRAGMA > > -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include > > -DPTRACING -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include -O3 -DSOLARIS -c Main.cxx > > -o obj_solaris_sparc_r/Main.o > > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -DP_USE_PRAGMA > > -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include > > -DPTRACING -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include -O3 -DSOLARIS -c > > SBCCallHandler.cxx -o obj_solaris_sparc_r/SBCCallHandler.o > > In file included from RouteRecord.h:86, > > from Router.h:124, > > from SBCRoutingHandler.h:127, > > from SBCCallHandler.cxx:123: > > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:795: error: ISO C++ > > forbids declaration of `map' with no type > > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:795: error: expected > > `;' before '<' token > > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h: In member function > > `void B2BUA::B2BUAConnection::AddMergedBranch(const std::string&, > > const std::string&)': > > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:771: error: > > `m_MergedBranch' undeclared (first use this function) > > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:771: error: (Each > > undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it > > appears in.) > > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h: In member function > > `BOOL B2BUA::B2BUAConnection::IsMergedBranch(const std::string&, > > std::string&)': > > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:777: error: expected > > primary-expression before "const" > > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:777: error: expected > > `;' before "const" > > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:778: error: `it' > > undeclared (first use this function) > > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:778: error: > > `m_MergedBranch' undeclared (first use this function) > > gmake[1]: *** [obj_solaris_sparc_r/SBCCallHandler.o] Error 1 > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/d65/src/opensbc' > > gmake: *** [optnoshared] Error 2 > > ####################################################### > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > > Ope...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-12-21 01:44:47
|
The offending code is referring to standard STL maps. Do you have libstdc++ installed? Jack Damn wrote: > Changes to B2BUAConnection.h in revision 1.70 is giving me following > errors when compiling CVS opensbc: > (Solaris 10 with GCC 3.4.3 from Sun). Please help, had no issues before. > > Thanks. > -JD > > ####################################################### > > gmake optnoshared > > gmake P_SHAREDLIB=0 opt > gmake[1]: Entering directory `/d65/src/opensbc' > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -DP_USE_PRAGMA > -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include > -DPTRACING -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include -O3 -DSOLARIS -c Main.cxx > -o obj_solaris_sparc_r/Main.o > g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -DP_USE_PRAGMA > -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include > -DPTRACING -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include -O3 -DSOLARIS -c > SBCCallHandler.cxx -o obj_solaris_sparc_r/SBCCallHandler.o > In file included from RouteRecord.h:86, > from Router.h:124, > from SBCRoutingHandler.h:127, > from SBCCallHandler.cxx:123: > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:795: error: ISO C++ > forbids declaration of `map' with no type > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:795: error: expected > `;' before '<' token > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h: In member function > `void B2BUA::B2BUAConnection::AddMergedBranch(const std::string&, > const std::string&)': > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:771: error: > `m_MergedBranch' undeclared (first use this function) > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:771: error: (Each > undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it > appears in.) > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h: In member function > `BOOL B2BUA::B2BUAConnection::IsMergedBranch(const std::string&, > std::string&)': > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:777: error: expected > primary-expression before "const" > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:777: error: expected > `;' before "const" > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:778: error: `it' > undeclared (first use this function) > /d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:778: error: > `m_MergedBranch' undeclared (first use this function) > gmake[1]: *** [obj_solaris_sparc_r/SBCCallHandler.o] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/d65/src/opensbc' > gmake: *** [optnoshared] Error 2 > ####################################################### > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <joe...@gm...> - 2007-12-21 01:41:35
|
This is a feature in OpenSBC that remembers previous registrations that were active before it was shutdown either through a restart or a crash. The cash folder is in opensbc_dir/registry. sales@ER wrote: > Hi Joegen > > I am seeing **** Contact Recovery ***** at the top of a brand new log. I > have not seen this before in pass logs. What does this mean and what could > cause it? > > Warren Kreckler > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > > |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <jb...@so...> - 2007-12-21 01:33:46
|
{noformat}Resend: {noformat}{noformat}1. Did you increase the number of file handles per process (rlimit)?
Let's eliminate the possibility that you are just hitting the 1024 file
handle limit per process.
2. If its crashing, then it is highly probable that a back-traceable
core file can be generated. If possible, enable core dumps and perform
a back-trace on the core file and send it to the forum.{noformat}
|
|
From: Joegen E. B. <jb...@so...> - 2007-12-21 01:29:45
|
OpenSBC should be able to bridge the RTP. At least that is the intended behavior. Are you saying that OpenSBC RTP stream uses the private interface for both the caller and the media server? You may try to enable iproute in OpenSBC and see if it solves the problem for you. To do this, do a make clean on both OpenSBC and OpenSIPStack and configure the stack with --enable-gpllibs switch ./configure --enable-gpllibs This shoul tell OpenSIPStack to use iproute to determine the best interface to use. Joegen |
|
From: Joegen E. B. <jb...@so...> - 2007-12-21 01:16:12
|
>> Where do the configurations reside once changes are made to throught the GUI interface? XML/Conf file? In Windows, its in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE/Software/opensipstack.org registry folder In Unix it's in $(HOME)/.pwlib_config/opensbc.ini (don't miss the dot "." ) . You can also use a custom ini file via the command line opensbc -d -p mypidfile.txt -i /universe/milkyway/solarsystem/earth/my_own_ini.ini HTH Joegen |
|
From: Jack D. <455...@gm...> - 2007-12-20 22:32:19
|
Changes to B2BUAConnection.h in revision 1.70 is giving me following
errors when compiling CVS opensbc:
(Solaris 10 with GCC 3.4.3 from Sun). Please help, had no issues before.
Thanks.
-JD
#######################################################
gmake optnoshared
gmake P_SHAREDLIB=0 opt
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/d65/src/opensbc'
g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -DP_USE_PRAGMA
-DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include
-DPTRACING -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include -O3 -DSOLARIS -c Main.cxx
-o obj_solaris_sparc_r/Main.o
g++ -DP_USE_PRAGMA -DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -DP_USE_PRAGMA
-DFD_SETSIZE=16384 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include
-DPTRACING -I/d65/src/opensipstack/include -O3 -DSOLARIS -c
SBCCallHandler.cxx -o obj_solaris_sparc_r/SBCCallHandler.o
In file included from RouteRecord.h:86,
from Router.h:124,
from SBCRoutingHandler.h:127,
from SBCCallHandler.cxx:123:
/d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:795: error: ISO C++
forbids declaration of `map' with no type
/d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:795: error: expected
`;' before '<' token
/d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h: In member function
`void B2BUA::B2BUAConnection::AddMergedBranch(const std::string&,
const std::string&)':
/d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:771: error:
`m_MergedBranch' undeclared (first use this function)
/d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:771: error: (Each
undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it
appears in.)
/d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h: In member function
`BOOL B2BUA::B2BUAConnection::IsMergedBranch(const std::string&,
std::string&)':
/d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:777: error: expected
primary-expression before "const"
/d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:777: error: expected
`;' before "const"
/d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:778: error: `it'
undeclared (first use this function)
/d65/src/opensipstack/include/B2BUAConnection.h:778: error:
`m_MergedBranch' undeclared (first use this function)
gmake[1]: *** [obj_solaris_sparc_r/SBCCallHandler.o] Error 1
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/d65/src/opensbc'
gmake: *** [optnoshared] Error 2
#######################################################
|
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-20 21:18:23
|
Hi Joegen I am seeing **** Contact Recovery ***** at the top of a brand new log. I have not seen this before in pass logs. What does this mean and what could cause it? Warren Kreckler |
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-20 21:13:22
|
Hi I am experiencing something random. One a fresh installed box. with sip-trunk set with an *.xml configured the Web admin does not see the registration the last few starts and stops. But has in the pass. I was looking at SBCCallHandler::OnOutgoingCall and i can see the test for the sip-trunk support/routeList(). Without tracking the entire track can someone tell me what triggers the registration? In both B2BUA and Relay routes i have used [] sip:ISTP;sip-trunk=true. Do this trigger the registration or lack there of? Does OSBC contact the trunk provider early in OSBC boot strapping? Warren Kreckler |
|
From: <sa...@ER...> - 2007-12-20 07:47:32
|
Hi Joegen
In this instance i am dealing with an ITSP that requires the From to be
*@192.159.100.100 and not *@themaninthemiddle.com . I want to hardwire it
for now. I was speaking to a vendor of SBC hardware who told me in all the
SBC's he is aware of you can make this charge in there admin interface.
Shouldn't openSBC offer the same basic funtionality, right out of the gate?
This is an increasing requirement from some ITSP when dealing with
peer-to-peer security.
Thanks for the info. I was seriously thinking that i could make a hardwire
change in SBCSIPTrunkRoutingHandler.cxx
BOOL SBCSIPTrunkRoutingHandler::B2BRouteCall(
B2BUAConnection & connection,
SIPMessage & invite,
BOOL /*ignoreRegistrations*/
)
Just for my info. Could i make the hardwiring here ==
connection.AddRoute( routeURI ); ??
Warren Kreckler
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joegen E. Baclor" <joe...@gm...>
To: <ope...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2007 8:41 PM
Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] How to modify From: Header
> Hi Warren,
>
> Yes this is the right list in asking OpenSBC specific development
> issues. I think I already pointed you to the proper callback before.
> For you to rewrite anything in the outbound invite you need to override
> the following method
>
> void B2BCallInterface::OnOutgoingCall(
> B2BUAConnection & connection,
> B2BUACall & call,
> SIPMessage & invite
> )
> {
> }
>
>
> As you can see, the invite in this function is not a const object.
> Thus, you are allowed to change anything in this invite. However, you
> need to be sure that you do not touch parameters that are necessary in
> identifying the call as well as identifying dialog. These are
>
> 1. From and To tags
> 2. Via Branch
> 3. Call-Id
> 4. Route-Sets
>
> You may override this in the main-trunk SBCCallHandler.cxx if you want
> to affect all calls. If you are just after call specific to a
> particular trunk, then you must create your own Call Handler override.
>
> HTH
>
>
> sales@ER wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Not sure if this is the right spot but can anyone help direct me to
> > Howto modify the FROM: header?
> >
> > I need to change the domain name to an ipaddr before sending to ITSP.
> >
> > Warren Kreckler.
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> > It's the best place to buy or sell services
> > for just about anything Open Source.
> >
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> > Ope...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
> It's the best place to buy or sell services
> for just about anything Open Source.
>
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
> _______________________________________________
> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
>
|
14 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
