opensipstack-osbcdevel Mailing List for OpenSIPStack
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
Menu
▾
▴
opensipstack-osbcdevel — Discussions on OpenSBC
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(92) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(84) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: 小布 <571...@qq...> - 2012-05-23 02:38:54
|
Dear all,I have OpenSBC-1-1-5_RC3 running in B2BUA UpperReg Mode, deployed it in front of OpenIMSCore.I use uctimsclient as the client. User registrations are being successfully to OpenIMSCore routed through OpenSBC ,but when I make calls,the OpenIMSCore responsed with "403 Forbidden Not Registered!" .But I have registered successfully before sending invite.I searched onlint about this problem,someone say that it maybe because the contact field of the register message and the invite message are different.So I checked the contact field of the register message and the invite message,and I found that they do different!Also,the invite message that OpenSBC forwarded has no "Route" in "Via" field. So anyone could tell me how to configue or modify the OpenSBC can make it just forwards the invite message but not rewrite? Below are the messages I catched with wireshark: uctimsclient IP:10.108.114.161 OpenSBC IP:10.108.115.160 OpenIMSCore IP:10.108.112.3 (1)Source register message(uctimsclient sends to OpenSBC): REGISTER sip:open-ims.test SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.108.114.161:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK199146792 From: <sip:bob@open-ims.test>;tag=1071778406 To: <sip:bob@open-ims.test> Call-ID: 1039155445 CSeq: 1 REGISTER Contact: <sip:bob@10.108.114.161:5060;line=91bd58e3edb376e> Authorization: Digest username="bob@open-ims.test", realm="open-ims.test", nonce=" ", uri="sip:open-ims.test", response=" " Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: UCT IMS Client Expires: 600000 Supported: path Content-Length: 0 (2)Forward register message(OpenSBC sends to OpenIMSCore): REGISTER sip:bob@open-ims.test SIP/2.0 From: <sip:bob@open-ims.test>;tag=1071778406 To: <sip:bob@open-ims.test> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.108.115.160:5060;branch=z9hG4bKccdcafe27fa2e1118165e501eb40e155;uas-addr=10.108.112.3;x-reg-id=c2lwOmJvYkAxMC4xMDguMTE0LjE2MTo1MDYw Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.108.114.161:5060;branch=z9hG4bK199146792;rport=5060;received=10.108.114.161 CSeq: 1 REGISTER Call-ID: 1039155445 Contact: <sip:x-reg-id-sip%3Abob%4010.108.114.161%3A5060%3Bsend-addr%3D10.108.114.161%3A5060@10.108.115.160:5062;line=91bd58e3edb376e> User-Agent: UCT IMS Client Expires: 600000 Max-Forwards: 70 Authorization: Digest username="bob@open-ims.test", realm="open-ims.test", nonce=" ", uri="sip:open-ims.test", response=" " Supported: path Content-Length: 0 (3)Source invite message(uctimsclient sends to OpenSBC): INVITE sip:alice@open-ims.test SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.108.114.161:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK155360770 Route: <sip:orig@scscf.open-ims.test:6060;lr> From: "Bob" <sip:bob@open-ims.test>;tag=392237072 To: <sip:alice@open-ims.test> Call-ID: 1574149825 CSeq: 20 INVITE Contact: <sip:bob@10.108.114.161:5060> Content-Type: application/sdp Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: UCT IMS Client Subject: IMS Call P-Preferred-Identity: "Bob" <sip:bob@open-ims.test> Privacy: none P-Access-Network-Info: IEEE-802.11a Require: sec-agree Proxy-Require: sec-agree Supported: 100rel Content-Length: 325 v=0 o=- 0 0 IN IP4 10.108.114.161 s=IMS Call c=IN IP4 10.108.114.161 t=0 0 m=audio 14586 RTP/AVP 3 0 101 b=AS:64 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-11 a=curr:qos local none a=curr:qos remote none a=des:qos none local sendrecv a=des:qos none remote sendrecv (4)Forward invite message(OpenSBC sends to OpenIMSCore): INVITE sip:alice@open-ims.test SIP/2.0 From: "Bob" <sip:bob@open-ims.test>;tag=392237072 To: <sip:alice@open-ims.test> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.108.115.160:5060;iid=30204;branch=z9hG4bKb801352e80a2e1118165e501eb40e155;uas-addr=10.108.112.3;rport CSeq: 20 INVITE Call-ID: 1574149825-0x0001 Contact: <sip:bob@10.108.115.160:5060> P-Preferred-Identity: "Bob" <sip:bob@open-ims.test> Privacy: none Subject: IMS Call User-Agent: UCT IMS Client Max-Forwards: 69 Proxy-Require: sec-agree Require: sec-agree Supported: 100rel P-Access-Network-Info: IEEE-802.11a Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 325 v=0 o=- 0 0 IN IP4 10.108.114.161 s=IMS Call c=IN IP4 10.108.115.160 t=0 0 m=audio 10002 RTP/AVP 3 0 101 b=AS:64 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-11 a=curr:qos local none a=curr:qos remote none a=des:qos none local sendrecv a=des:qos none remote sendrecv (5)403 Forbidden OpenIMSCore responsed: SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden - Not Registered! You must register first with a S-CSCF From: "Bob" <sip:bob@open-ims.test>;tag=392237072 To: <sip:alice@open-ims.test>;tag=63ff54fe497b36d2a5d235b96c7297c2.efcd Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.108.115.160:5060;iid=30204;branch=z9hG4bKb801352e80a2e1118165e501eb40e155;uas-addr=10.108.112.3;rport=5060 CSeq: 20 INVITE Call-ID: 1574149825-0x0001 Server: Sip EXpress router (2.1.0-dev1 OpenIMSCore (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 Warning: 392 10.108.112.3:4060 "Noisy feedback tells: pid=1706 req_src_ip=10.108.115.160 req_src_port=5060 in_uri=sip:alice@open-ims.test out_uri=sip:alice@open-ims.test via_cnt==1" Thanks and best wishes! Yours sincerely, Helen |
|
From: Symbian A. <asy...@ya...> - 2011-04-22 13:16:14
|
Hi Jeff, i just was able to compile OpenSBC in Visual Studio2008 Framework and all as well but the problem is that on Debugging i m getting an PromptBox -Not Run as service! as a message.Can u please guide what and why is this happening.Any help would be fully welcomed.Thanks AmbIKA |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-09-19 00:44:47
|
Hi Jeff, Referred-By is a separate RFC. I just did not find the time yet to support it yet. If you have a patch for it, it's very much welcome. Anderson, Jeff wrote: > > From a recent post that included log traces for a refer with openSBC > enabled with “local refer” call routing, I noticed that the new call > leg re-invite doesn’t included the Referred-By header. Is there an > option to enable this or why doesn’t it copy that header to the > referred leg? > > Thanks > > jeff > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > |
|
From: Anderson, J. <Jef...@pr...> - 2009-09-18 22:51:45
|
>From a recent post that included log traces for a refer with openSBC enabled with "local refer" call routing, I noticed that the new call leg re-invite doesn't included the Referred-By header. Is there an option to enable this or why doesn't it copy that header to the referred leg? Thanks jeff |
|
From: Alexandre K. <ale...@gm...> - 2009-09-16 01:20:06
|
Good night. Two weeks ago my OSBC started to chash again, like the line extracted from syslog shows: Sep 15 12:34:22 SBCSP01 kernel: [131688.092229] opensbc[3347]: segfault at e519ef4 ip 082f9767 sp b53f70c0 error 6 in opensbc[8048000+443000] Sep 15 18:07:16 SBCSP01 kernel: [152201.678110] opensbc[6776]: segfault at fe6cb54 ip 082f9767 sp b1def0c0 error 6 in opensbc[8048000+443000] Sep 14 09:44:13 SBCSP01 kernel: [ 7236.588691] opensbc[20661]: segfault at fb26244 ip 082f9767 sp b566d0c0 error 6 in opensbc[8048000+443000] Sep 14 09:58:37 SBCSP01 kernel: [ 8154.254253] opensbc[24456]: segfault at bae4db7c ip 082f9767 sp b3c7d0c0 error 6 in opensbc[8048000+443000] Sep 14 15:28:21 SBCSP01 kernel: [28405.235052] opensbc[25998]: segfault at bc1da724 ip 082f9767 sp b4a3c0c0 error 6 in opensbc[8048000+443000] Sep 14 16:45:17 SBCSP01 kernel: [33222.038097] opensbc[11620]: segfault at b868daa4 ip 082f9767 sp b1eb20c0 error 6 in opensbc[8048000+443000] Sep 14 17:06:47 SBCSP01 kernel: [34528.055054] opensbc[16617]: segfault at eab3424 ip 082f9767 sp b1c3c0c0 error 6 in opensbc[8048000+443000] Any ideas?! Thanks in advance. -- Atenciosamente, ALEXANDRE KELLER http://twitter.com/alexandrekeller "Dinheiro é a consequência de um trabalho bem feito e não o motivo para se fazer um bom trabalho." P Antes de imprimir pense em seu compromisso com o Meio Ambiente. On 03/07/2009, at 20:56, Joegen Baclor wrote: > That smells like you are hitting a file handle limit. Make sure > that you set 'ulimit -n 65536' when starting OpenSBC. There is a > new startup script for opensbc you can use for debian based system > under opensbc/tools/init.d folder. That script automatically sets > the file hadles to the correct number. > > From: Alexandre Keller > Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 12:53 AM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: [OpenSBC] OSBC crashing from time to time.... > > Hi there. > > My OSBC is crashing from time to time, like the following lines, > extracted from syslog. > > Jul 3 12:48:41 SBCSP01 OpenSBC[8303]: #012Caught segmentation fault > (SIGSEGV), thread_id=3042667408 name=OpalMediaThread:b547d430, > aborting. > Jul 3 12:48:41 SBCSP01 kernel: [87035.962859] opensbc[10575]: > segfault at 1035fd3c ip 0833029d sp b55f70e0 error 6 in > opensbc[8048000+480000] > > Any ideas?! > > Thanks in advance > -- > Atenciosamente, > > ALEXANDRE KELLER > > "Dinheiro é a consequência de um trabalho bem feito > e não o motivo para se fazer um bom trabalho." > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.2/2215 - Release Date: > 07/02/09 18:06:00 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel |
|
From: Meftah T. <tay...@gm...> - 2009-08-29 10:37:08
|
hello all this is my OpenSBC Compile Log, is atached a a text file this is the 10 try i'm compiling it but nothing hapened thx all Joegen Baclor wrote: > OpenSBC builds without any other dependency aside from OpenSIPstack. > The best way to build it in windows is to put opensbc and opensipstack > in the same directory level. Open the appropriate OpenSBC solution > for your IDE. There are solutions for VC7, VC8 and VC9. Build using > the release configuration first followed by debug. If you encounter > an error, just send the compiler log here and lets see what we can do. > > Scripting is much easier done using a C like interface and limiting > your objects to basic types. Complex OO objects (like the objects in > OpenSIPStack) can be very tricky. If you have proposal what the best > path to take is let me know. For the mean time, take the first step > and compile OpenSBC. > > There is currently an activity going on in Solegy wrapping OpenSBC > into an API for programmers can use. The module is part of a > commercial suite but I am sure I can convince Solegy to leave at least > that module to stay open. Perhaps this is the best place to put the > scriptability function. > > Meftah Tayeb wrote: >> hi Joegen >> sur, i like freeswitch >> but also i like Open Sip Stack also! >> Joegen, what you think if we add scripting capability to OpenSBC >> Media Server, to build IVR's? >> i'm realy inspired by freeswitch! >> and also, i'm working with you to restart the module development. >> // >> i have mor errors compiling OpenSBC in win32, could you explin me mor >> about any Dependensy to add please? >> thank Joegen! >> Joegen Baclor wrote: >>> Hi Meftah, >>> >>> Welcome to this list. I will be honest with you. It has been a >>> long time since i've checked that portion of the code. This is >>> because of the lack of developers who will maintain the media server >>> module. This probably because freeswitch is a better choice as an >>> IVR. However, if your are willing to take this head on and help >>> develop it, I will be more than happy to get my gears and get this >>> module back to life. >>> >>> Best of luck with the crusade of having an ActiveX wrapper for SIP :-) >>> >>> Joegen >>> >>> >>> Meftah Tayeb wrote: >>> >>>> hello >>>> please how to test the OpenSBC Media Server? >>>> i dialed 5000 bbut i got temporarily unavailable >>>> Win32 (XP 32Byte X86) >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >>>> signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ >>>> >>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >>>> >>>> http://www.eset.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >>>> signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ >>>> >>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >>>> >>>> http://www.eset.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >>>> signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ >>>> >>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >>>> >>>> http://www.eset.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports >>>> 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and >>>> deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application >>>> coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >>>> Ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 >>> 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and >>> deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. >>> Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >>> Ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >>> >>> >>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >>> signature database 4378 (20090828) __________ >>> >>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >>> >>> http://www.eset.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >> signature database 4378 (20090828) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4378 (20090828) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4378 (20090828) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-08-29 02:11:02
|
OpenSBC builds without any other dependency aside from OpenSIPstack. The best way to build it in windows is to put opensbc and opensipstack in the same directory level. Open the appropriate OpenSBC solution for your IDE. There are solutions for VC7, VC8 and VC9. Build using the release configuration first followed by debug. If you encounter an error, just send the compiler log here and lets see what we can do. Scripting is much easier done using a C like interface and limiting your objects to basic types. Complex OO objects (like the objects in OpenSIPStack) can be very tricky. If you have proposal what the best path to take is let me know. For the mean time, take the first step and compile OpenSBC. There is currently an activity going on in Solegy wrapping OpenSBC into an API for programmers can use. The module is part of a commercial suite but I am sure I can convince Solegy to leave at least that module to stay open. Perhaps this is the best place to put the scriptability function. Meftah Tayeb wrote: > hi Joegen > sur, i like freeswitch > but also i like Open Sip Stack also! > Joegen, what you think if we add scripting capability to OpenSBC Media > Server, to build IVR's? > i'm realy inspired by freeswitch! > and also, i'm working with you to restart the module development. > // > i have mor errors compiling OpenSBC in win32, could you explin me mor > about any Dependensy to add please? > thank Joegen! > Joegen Baclor wrote: >> Hi Meftah, >> >> Welcome to this list. I will be honest with you. It has been a long >> time since i've checked that portion of the code. This is because of >> the lack of developers who will maintain the media server module. This >> probably because freeswitch is a better choice as an IVR. However, if >> your are willing to take this head on and help develop it, I will be >> more than happy to get my gears and get this module back to life. >> >> Best of luck with the crusade of having an ActiveX wrapper for SIP :-) >> >> Joegen >> >> >> Meftah Tayeb wrote: >> >>> hello >>> please how to test the OpenSBC Media Server? >>> i dialed 5000 bbut i got temporarily unavailable >>> Win32 (XP 32Byte X86) >>> thanks >>> >>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >>> signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ >>> >>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >>> >>> http://www.eset.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >>> signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ >>> >>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >>> >>> http://www.eset.com >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ >>> >>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >>> >>> http://www.eset.com >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on >>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >>> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >>> Ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4378 (20090828) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4378 (20090828) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com |
|
From: Meftah T. <tay...@gm...> - 2009-08-29 01:27:09
|
hi Joegen sur, i like freeswitch but also i like Open Sip Stack also! Joegen, what you think if we add scripting capability to OpenSBC Media Server, to build IVR's? i'm realy inspired by freeswitch! and also, i'm working with you to restart the module development. // i have mor errors compiling OpenSBC in win32, could you explin me mor about any Dependensy to add please? thank Joegen! Joegen Baclor wrote: > Hi Meftah, > > Welcome to this list. I will be honest with you. It has been a long > time since i've checked that portion of the code. This is because of > the lack of developers who will maintain the media server module. This > probably because freeswitch is a better choice as an IVR. However, if > your are willing to take this head on and help develop it, I will be > more than happy to get my gears and get this module back to life. > > Best of luck with the crusade of having an ActiveX wrapper for SIP :-) > > Joegen > > > Meftah Tayeb wrote: > >> hello >> please how to test the OpenSBC Media Server? >> i dialed 5000 bbut i got temporarily unavailable >> Win32 (XP 32Byte X86) >> thanks >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >> signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus >> signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> >> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ >> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. >> >> http://www.eset.com >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >> >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4378 (20090828) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4378 (20090828) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-08-29 00:54:51
|
Hi Meftah, Welcome to this list. I will be honest with you. It has been a long time since i've checked that portion of the code. This is because of the lack of developers who will maintain the media server module. This probably because freeswitch is a better choice as an IVR. However, if your are willing to take this head on and help develop it, I will be more than happy to get my gears and get this module back to life. Best of luck with the crusade of having an ActiveX wrapper for SIP :-) Joegen Meftah Tayeb wrote: > hello > please how to test the OpenSBC Media Server? > i dialed 5000 bbut i got temporarily unavailable > Win32 (XP 32Byte X86) > thanks > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus > signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > |
|
From: Meftah T. <tay...@gm...> - 2009-08-28 12:53:22
|
hello please how to test the OpenSBC Media Server? i dialed 5000 bbut i got temporarily unavailable Win32 (XP 32Byte X86) thanks __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4376 (20090828) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-08-07 01:50:24
|
Hi Jon, OpenSBC sent a re-invite. Line #86 in the log file and packet #26 in the wireshark capture. This re-invite intends to reestablish the media between the endpoints. Joegen From: Jon Smith Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 2:13 AM To: ope...@li... Subject: [OpenSBC] Fwd: Local Refer Issue with opensbc 1.1.5 rc5 I meant to post this to the opensbcdevel list... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jon Smith <jsm...@gm...> Date: Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 2:04 PM Subject: Local Refer Issue with opensbc 1.1.5 rc5 To: ope...@li... I am using opensbc 1.1.5rc5 on a linux machine with two interfaces, one public and one private. I am able to place and receive calls without issue. I have Enable-Local-Refer=True in my opensbc.ini file. When I try to refer a call however, the originator sends a Refer, gets back a 202 Accepted, and a new call is placed outbound. The call connects, however none of the SIP messages or RTP from leg 2 (Public side) are sent back to Leg 1 (Private side), and so the transfer fails. I have attached a packet capture, log file, and ,my opensbc.conf file. I can provide any additional info that you might need - just let me know. Regards, Jon -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel |
|
From: Alexandre K. <ale...@gm...> - 2009-07-07 03:31:03
|
Hi. Thanks a lot, now my SBC server is working just fine. I've updated it to its last release and started using the new script. all the best. -- Atenciosamente, ALEXANDRE KELLER "Dinheiro é a consequência de um trabalho bem feito e não o motivo para se fazer um bom trabalho." On 03/07/2009, at 20:56, Joegen Baclor wrote: > That smells like you are hitting a file handle limit. Make sure > that you set 'ulimit -n 65536' when starting OpenSBC. There is a > new startup script for opensbc you can use for debian based system > under opensbc/tools/init.d folder. That script automatically sets > the file hadles to the correct number. > > From: Alexandre Keller > Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 12:53 AM > To: ope...@li... > Subject: [OpenSBC] OSBC crashing from time to time.... > > Hi there. > > My OSBC is crashing from time to time, like the following lines, > extracted from syslog. > > Jul 3 12:48:41 SBCSP01 OpenSBC[8303]: #012Caught segmentation fault > (SIGSEGV), thread_id=3042667408 name=OpalMediaThread:b547d430, > aborting. > Jul 3 12:48:41 SBCSP01 kernel: [87035.962859] opensbc[10575]: > segfault at 1035fd3c ip 0833029d sp b55f70e0 error 6 in > opensbc[8048000+480000] > > Any ideas?! > > Thanks in advance > -- > Atenciosamente, > > ALEXANDRE KELLER > > "Dinheiro é a consequência de um trabalho bem feito > e não o motivo para se fazer um bom trabalho." > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.2/2215 - Release Date: > 07/02/09 18:06:00 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-07-03 23:56:35
|
That smells like you are hitting a file handle limit. Make sure that you set 'ulimit -n 65536' when starting OpenSBC. There is a new startup script for opensbc you can use for debian based system under opensbc/tools/init.d folder. That script automatically sets the file hadles to the correct number. From: Alexandre Keller Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2009 12:53 AM To: ope...@li... Subject: [OpenSBC] OSBC crashing from time to time.... Hi there. My OSBC is crashing from time to time, like the following lines, extracted from syslog. Jul 3 12:48:41 SBCSP01 OpenSBC[8303]: #012Caught segmentation fault (SIGSEGV), thread_id=3042667408 name=OpalMediaThread:b547d430, aborting. Jul 3 12:48:41 SBCSP01 kernel: [87035.962859] opensbc[10575]: segfault at 1035fd3c ip 0833029d sp b55f70e0 error 6 in opensbc[8048000+480000] Any ideas?! Thanks in advance -- Atenciosamente, ALEXANDRE KELLER "Dinheiro é a consequência de um trabalho bem feito e não o motivo para se fazer um bom trabalho." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.2/2215 - Release Date: 07/02/09 18:06:00 |
|
From: Alexandre K. <ale...@gm...> - 2009-07-03 16:53:57
|
Hi there. My OSBC is crashing from time to time, like the following lines, extracted from syslog. Jul 3 12:48:41 SBCSP01 OpenSBC[8303]: #012Caught segmentation fault (SIGSEGV), thread_id=3042667408 name=OpalMediaThread:b547d430, aborting. Jul 3 12:48:41 SBCSP01 kernel: [87035.962859] opensbc[10575]: segfault at 1035fd3c ip 0833029d sp b55f70e0 error 6 in opensbc[8048000+480000] Any ideas?! Thanks in advance -- Atenciosamente, ALEXANDRE KELLER "Dinheiro é a consequência de um trabalho bem feito e não o motivo para se fazer um bom trabalho." |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-05-19 23:50:03
|
I have received this request from another individual just a week ago. Perhaps it's time to support a custom header macro insertion in OpenSBC. I'll update this thread when it's ready for testing. Joegen -------------------------------------------------- From: "Graham Lewis" <gl...@as...> Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 9:46 PM To: <ope...@li...> Subject: [OpenSBC] Remote IP address as X-header > Hi all, > > Is there a way to get the IP address of the remote UA passed through the > OpenSBC > in Upper-registration mode in an X-Header like "X-Remote-IP=x.x.x.x" > > On our switch behind the SBC I need to be able to run checks on the actual > IP > address of the remote host rather than the source which will be that of > the SBC > of course. > > > regards > > Graham Lewis > ---- Msg sent via Spitfire - http://www.spitfire.co.uk > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial > Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables > unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine > for externally facing server and web deployment. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.5.329 / Virus Database: 270.12.34/2121 - Release Date: 05/18/09 > 17:55:00 > |
|
From: Graham L. <gl...@as...> - 2009-05-19 15:50:05
|
Hi all, Is there a way to get the IP address of the remote UA passed through the OpenSBC in Upper-registration mode in an X-Header like "X-Remote-IP=x.x.x.x" On our switch behind the SBC I need to be able to run checks on the actual IP address of the remote host rather than the source which will be that of the SBC of course. regards Graham Lewis ---- Msg sent via Spitfire - http://www.spitfire.co.uk |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-04-02 11:24:19
|
That is great news. Glad to hear it. From: msp Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 6:17 PM To: OSBC-Devel Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC is crashing in high CPS After upgrading to latest version, OSBC is not crashing anymore... Thanks, msp -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.37/2036 - Release Date: 04/01/09 21:02:00 |
|
From: msp <pm...@gm...> - 2009-04-02 10:17:21
|
After upgrading to latest version, OSBC is not crashing anymore... Thanks, msp |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-04-02 00:37:10
|
Hi Ramu,
If the REGISTER you sent here came from SJPhone going to OSBC, then having the private contact address in 200 OK is the correct behavior. Can you send me a level 5 log of the call itself please.
Joegen
From: Ramu
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:20 AM
To: Joegen Baclor ; ope...@li...
Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Upper Registration
Hi,
With CVS build Upper Registration and Calls working fine.
But 200 OK for REGISTER message are not getting natted. Please see my sip trace.
You will find private ip in contact header. Because of this ACK is going to private IP when I make calls.
U 59.93.60.62:5060 -> 66.42.9.197:6060
REGISTER sip:66.42.9.197:5070 SIP/2.0.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.102;branch=z9hG4bKc0a800660000001349d3afc400001ef000000000;rport.
From: "unknown" <sip:3000@66.42.9.197:5070>;tag=6ca7a3d846.
To: <sip:3000@66.42.9.197:5070>.
Contact: <sip:3000@192.168.0.102>.
Call-ID: BD761434D6A844C69C1D62D7D60C92E50xc0a80066.
CSeq: 1 REGISTER.
Max-Forwards: 70.
User-Agent: SJphone/1.65.377a (SJ Labs).
Content-Length: 0.
.
U 66.42.9.197:6060 -> 59.93.60.62:5060
SIP/2.0 200 OK.
From: "unknown" <sip:3000@66.42.9.197:5070>;tag=6ca7a3d846.
To: <sip:3000@66.42.9.197:5070>;tag=868a1bf6d23ab55fc42f5c2b5d8a518a.59ac.
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.102;branch=z9hG4bKc0a800660000001349d3afc400001ef000000000;rport=5060;received=59.93.60.62.
CSeq: 1 REGISTER.
Call-ID: BD761434D6A844C69C1D62D7D60C92E50xc0a80066.
Contact: <sip:3000@192.168.0.102>;expires=3600.
Server: Kamailio (1.4.3-notls (i386/linux)).
Content-Length: 0.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Ramu <ram...@gm...> wrote:
Hi,
After setting "Route-List" as "[sip:*] 192.168.0.160 in "B2BUA-Routes" page am not getting "404 Not Found" but call is not reaching other party.
If I remove this entry then I am getting "404 Not Found"
When I do SIP trace I come to know that SIP packets are traversing in loopback interface and finally getting "483 Too many hops" message.
Please see the attached SIP trace file.
1) In "OpenSBC-General-Parameters" page I set SBC-Application-Mode to "B2BUpperReg mode"
2) In "Upper-Registration" page I checked All-Reg-As-Upper-Reg
2009/3/31 Joegen Baclor <joe...@gm...>
Sorry for the late response. Would you be able to trace through the code to see where it ends up with a 404. If you can, put a breakpoint inside
void SBCBackDoorTrunk::OnReceivedBypassedMessage
function located in (ironically enough) line 404 of SBCBackDoorTrunk.cxx.
From: Ramu
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 12:56 AM
To: ope...@li...
Subject: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Upper Registration
Hi,
I am trying to use OpenSBC for Upper Registration.
OpenSBC is sending register request to other registrar/proxy and phones (UA) are registering with other registrar but the problem is when I try to call the user am getting "404 Not Found" from OpenSBC.
My setup as follows:
Phones (UA) ===> OpenSBC ===> Registrar (OpenSER)
Registrations are happening perfect.
I am herewith attaching REGISTER and INVITE SIP captures.
In my setup OpenSBC is running in 192.168.0.200 and OpenSER is running in 192.168.0.160 as registrar.
Thanks
/Ramu
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
Ope...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.33/2031 - Release Date: 03/30/09 17:56:00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
Ope...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
--
Regards,
/Ramu
--
Regards,
/Ramu
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.35/2033 - Release Date: 03/31/09 13:05:00
|
|
From: Ramu <ram...@gm...> - 2009-04-01 18:21:09
|
Hi, With CVS build Upper Registration and Calls working fine. But 200 OK for REGISTER message are not getting natted. Please see my sip trace. You will find private ip in contact header. Because of this ACK is going to private IP when I make calls. U 59.93.60.62:5060 -> 66.42.9.197:6060 REGISTER sip:66.42.9.197:5070 SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.102;branch=z9hG4bKc0a800660000001349d3afc400001ef000000000;rport. From: "unknown" <sip:3000@66.42.9.197:5070>;tag=6ca7a3d846. To: <sip:3000@66.42.9.197:5070>. Contact: <sip:3000@192.168.0.102 <sip%3A3000@192.168.0.102>>. Call-ID: BD761434D6A844C69C1D62D7D60C92E50xc0a80066. CSeq: 1 REGISTER. Max-Forwards: 70. User-Agent: SJphone/1.65.377a (SJ Labs). Content-Length: 0. . U 66.42.9.197:6060 -> 59.93.60.62:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK. From: "unknown" <sip:3000@66.42.9.197:5070>;tag=6ca7a3d846. To: <sip:3000@66.42.9.197:5070>;tag=868a1bf6d23ab55fc42f5c2b5d8a518a.59ac. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.102;branch=z9hG4bKc0a800660000001349d3afc400001ef000000000;rport=5060;received=59.93.60.62. CSeq: 1 REGISTER. Call-ID: BD761434D6A844C69C1D62D7D60C92E50xc0a80066. Contact: <sip:3000@192.168.0.102 <sip%3A3000@192.168.0.102>>;expires=3600. Server: Kamailio (1.4.3-notls (i386/linux)). Content-Length: 0. On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:22 PM, Ramu <ram...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > After setting "Route-List" as "[sip:*] 192.168.0.160 in "B2BUA-Routes" page > am not getting "404 Not Found" but call is not reaching other party. > > If I remove this entry then I am getting "404 Not Found" > > When I do SIP trace I come to know that SIP packets are traversing in > loopback interface and finally getting "483 Too many hops" message. > > Please see the attached SIP trace file. > > 1) In "OpenSBC-General-Parameters" page I set SBC-Application-Mode to > "B2BUpperReg mode" > 2) In "Upper-Registration" page I checked All-Reg-As-Upper-Reg > > 2009/3/31 Joegen Baclor <joe...@gm...> > >> Sorry for the late response. Would you be able to trace through the >> code to see where it ends up with a 404. If you can, put a breakpoint >> inside >> >> void SBCBackDoorTrunk::OnReceivedBypassedMessage >> >> function located in (ironically enough) line 404 of SBCBackDoorTrunk.cxx. >> >> *From:* Ramu <ram...@gm...> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 31, 2009 12:56 AM >> *To:* ope...@li... >> *Subject:* [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Upper Registration >> >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to use OpenSBC for Upper Registration. >> >> OpenSBC is sending register request to other registrar/proxy and phones >> (UA) are registering with other registrar but the problem is when I try to >> call the user am getting "404 Not Found" from OpenSBC. >> >> My setup as follows: >> Phones (UA) ===> OpenSBC ===> Registrar (OpenSER) >> >> Registrations are happening perfect. >> >> I am herewith attaching REGISTER and INVITE SIP captures. >> >> In my setup OpenSBC is running in 192.168.0.200 and OpenSER is running in >> 192.168.0.160 as registrar. >> >> Thanks >> /Ramu >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.33/2031 - Release Date: 03/30/09 >> 17:56:00 >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >> >> > > > -- > Regards, > /Ramu > -- Regards, /Ramu |
|
From: Ramu <ram...@gm...> - 2009-03-31 17:52:29
|
U 192.168.0.200:5062 -> 192.168.0.200:5060 INVITE sip:1004@192.168.0.200:5060;rinstance=895753b4e8f49b0b SIP/2.0. From: "unknown" <sip:2000@192.168.0.160>;tag=473883130d. To: <sip:1004@192.168.0.160>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.200:5062;iid=4469;branch=z9hG4bKe41a8a4ac11cde118394942394bda2af;uas-addr=192.168.0.200;rport. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Call-ID: 09DB045D150441D39F8F86A89B950CBB0xc0a80066-0x0001-0x0002. Contact: <sip:2000@192.168.0.200:5062>. User-Agent: Backdoor Trunk. Max-Forwards: 67. Supported: replaces, norefersub, timer. Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 368. . v=0. o=- 3447509823 3447509823 IN IP4 192.168.0.102. s=SJphone. c=IN IP4 192.168.0.200. t=0 0. m=audio 30006 RTP/AVP 3 97 98 8 0 101. c=IN IP4 192.168.0.200. a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000. a=rtpmap:97 iLBC/8000. a=rtpmap:98 iLBC/8000. a=fmtp:98 mode=20. a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000. a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000. a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000. a=fmtp:101 0-16. a=setup:active. a=sendrecv. U 192.168.0.200:5061 -> 192.168.0.200:5062 SIP/2.0 100 Trying. From: "unknown" <sip:2000@192.168.0.160>;tag=473883130d. To: <sip:1004@192.168.0.160>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.200:5062;iid=4469;branch=z9hG4bKe41a8a4ac11cde118394942394bda2af;uas-addr=192.168.0.200;rport=5062;received=192.168.0.200. CSeq: 1 INVITE. Call-ID: 09DB045D150441D39F8F86A89B950CBB0xc0a80066-0x0001-0x0002. Content-Length: 0. |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-03-31 13:12:29
|
Sorry for the late response. Would you be able to trace through the code to see where it ends up with a 404. If you can, put a breakpoint inside void SBCBackDoorTrunk::OnReceivedBypassedMessage function located in (ironically enough) line 404 of SBCBackDoorTrunk.cxx. From: Ramu Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 12:56 AM To: ope...@li... Subject: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC Upper Registration Hi, I am trying to use OpenSBC for Upper Registration. OpenSBC is sending register request to other registrar/proxy and phones (UA) are registering with other registrar but the problem is when I try to call the user am getting "404 Not Found" from OpenSBC. My setup as follows: Phones (UA) ===> OpenSBC ===> Registrar (OpenSER) Registrations are happening perfect. I am herewith attaching REGISTER and INVITE SIP captures. In my setup OpenSBC is running in 192.168.0.200 and OpenSER is running in 192.168.0.160 as registrar. Thanks /Ramu -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.33/2031 - Release Date: 03/30/09 17:56:00 |
|
From: Ramu <ram...@gm...> - 2009-03-30 16:56:15
|
Phone -> OpenSBC U 192.168.0.102:5060 -> 192.168.0.200:5060 REGISTER sip:master.pbx.dsip1.telivo.net SIP/2.0. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.102;branch=z9hG4bKc0a800660000001349d0eee300001a0000000000;rport. From: "unknown" <sip:20...@ma...>;tag=6ed1506665. To: <sip:20...@ma...>. Contact: <sip:2000@192.168.0.102>. Call-ID: F073E12C96A7407D8B692573F3BE67030xc0a80066. CSeq: 1 REGISTER. Max-Forwards: 70. User-Agent: SJphone/1.65.377a (SJ Labs). Content-Length: 0. . U 192.168.0.200:5060 -> 192.168.0.160:5060 REGISTER sip:master.pbx.dsip1.telivo.net SIP/2.0. From: "unknown" <sip:20...@ma...>;tag=6ed1506665. To: <sip:20...@ma...>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7c410f83f01bde11809e9e20496fab11;uas-addr=192.168.0.160;x-reg-id=c2lwOjIwMDBAMTkyLjE2OC4wLjEwMg%3D%3D. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.102;branch=z9hG4bKc0a800660000001349d0eee300001a0000000000;rport=5060;received=192.168.0.102. CSeq: 1 REGISTER. Call-ID: F073E12C96A7407D8B692573F3BE67030xc0a80066. Contact: <sip:2000@192.168.0.200:5062>;expires=3600. User-Agent: SJphone/1.65.377a (SJ Labs). Expires: 3600. Max-Forwards: 70. Content-Length: 0. . U 192.168.0.160:5060 -> 192.168.0.200:5060 SIP/2.0 100 Trying. From: "unknown" <sip:20...@ma...>;tag=6ed1506665. To: <sip:20...@ma...>. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7c410f83f01bde11809e9e20496fab11;uas-addr=192.168.0.160;x-reg-id=c2lwOjIwMDBAMTkyLjE2OC4wLjEwMg%3D%3D. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.102;branch=z9hG4bKc0a800660000001349d0eee300001a0000000000;rport=5060;received=192.168.0.102. CSeq: 1 REGISTER. Call-ID: F073E12C96A7407D8B692573F3BE67030xc0a80066. Server: Kamailio (1.4.3-notls (i386/linux)). Content-Length: 0. . U 192.168.0.160:5060 -> 192.168.0.200:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK. From: "unknown" <sip:20...@ma...>;tag=6ed1506665. To: <sip:20...@ma...>;tag=09c423fa455feb593b3ce9123f2eb857.a184. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.200:5060;branch=z9hG4bK7c410f83f01bde11809e9e20496fab11;uas-addr=192.168.0.160;x-reg-id=c2lwOjIwMDBAMTkyLjE2OC4wLjEwMg%3D%3D. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.102;branch=z9hG4bKc0a800660000001349d0eee300001a0000000000;rport=5060;received=192.168.0.102. CSeq: 1 REGISTER. Call-ID: F073E12C96A7407D8B692573F3BE67030xc0a80066. Contact: <sip:2000@192.168.0.200:5062>;expires=3600. Server: Kamailio (1.4.3-notls (i386/linux)). Content-Length: 0. . U 192.168.0.200:5061 -> 192.168.0.102:5060 SIP/2.0 200 OK. From: "unknown" <sip:20...@ma...>;tag=6ed1506665. To: <sip:20...@ma...>;tag=09c423fa455feb593b3ce9123f2eb857.a184. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.102;branch=z9hG4bKc0a800660000001349d0eee300001a0000000000;rport=5060;received=192.168.0.102. CSeq: 1 REGISTER. Call-ID: F073E12C96A7407D8B692573F3BE67030xc0a80066. Contact: <sip:2000@192.168.0.102>;expires=3600. Server: Kamailio (1.4.3-notls (i386/linux)). Content-Length: 0. . |
|
From: Ramu <ram...@gm...> - 2009-03-30 16:43:04
|
Hi, Thanks for your quick response. I tested with CVS version, it is working now. 2009/3/29 Joegen Baclor <joe...@gm...> > This is a known bug and is now corrected in CVS. Please use CVS > version. I would be interested to hear if this problem lingers in the CVS > version as well so please do let me know. > > *From:* Ramu <ram...@gm...> > *Sent:* Friday, March 27, 2009 1:12 AM > *To:* ope...@li... > *Subject:* [OpenSBC] opensbc generating core file while starting in > openvzcentos > > Hi, > > I installed opensbc in CentOS. CentOS is running in openvz virtual > machine. > > When I try to start with this command "opensbc -xc" it is dumping core > file. > > output as follows: > > [root@as1 ~]# /usr/local/src/OSBC/opensbc/distrib/opensbc -xc > All output for OpenSBC is to console. > 2009/03/26 17:07:46.692 OpenSBC Message Starting service > process "OpenSBC" v1.1.5-85 > 2009/03/26 17:07:46.692 OpenSBC Debug3 PWL: > [CID=0x00000000] OpenSBC Process is starting PID=4074 > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > Am herewith attaching output of "gdb opensbc core.pid" > > Please do let me know your thoughts? > > Thanks, > /Ramu > > ------------------------------ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > ------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.31/2027 - Release Date: 03/27/09 > 18:51:00 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > -- Regards, /Ramu |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-03-28 22:42:47
|
This is a known bug and is now corrected in CVS. Please use CVS version. I would be interested to hear if this problem lingers in the CVS version as well so please do let me know. From: Ramu Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 1:12 AM To: ope...@li... Subject: [OpenSBC] opensbc generating core file while starting in openvzcentos Hi, I installed opensbc in CentOS. CentOS is running in openvz virtual machine. When I try to start with this command "opensbc -xc" it is dumping core file. output as follows: [root@as1 ~]# /usr/local/src/OSBC/opensbc/distrib/opensbc -xc All output for OpenSBC is to console. 2009/03/26 17:07:46.692 OpenSBC Message Starting service process "OpenSBC" v1.1.5-85 2009/03/26 17:07:46.692 OpenSBC Debug3 PWL: [CID=0x00000000] OpenSBC Process is starting PID=4074 Segmentation fault (core dumped) Am herewith attaching output of "gdb opensbc core.pid" Please do let me know your thoughts? Thanks, /Ramu -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.31/2027 - Release Date: 03/27/09 18:51:00 |
14 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
