opensipstack-osbcdevel Mailing List for OpenSIPStack (Page 2)
Brought to you by:
joegenbaclor
Menu
▾
▴
opensipstack-osbcdevel — Discussions on OpenSBC
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(92) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 |
Jan
(31) |
Feb
(24) |
Mar
(54) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(31) |
Jun
(22) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(49) |
Oct
(41) |
Nov
(84) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(64) |
Feb
(37) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Ramu <ram...@gm...> - 2009-03-26 17:13:02
|
[root@as1 ~]# gdb /usr/local/src/OSBC/opensbc/distrib/opensbc /usr/local/src/OSBC/opensbc/distrib/core.4074 GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (6.5-37.el5_2.2rh) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". Reading symbols from /lib/libpthread.so.0...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libpthread.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.1 Reading symbols from /lib/libresolv.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libresolv.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib/libdl.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libdl.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.6...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/ld-linux.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/ld-linux.so.2 Reading symbols from /lib/libnss_files.so.2...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libnss_files.so.2 Core was generated by `/usr/local/src/OSBC/opensbc/distrib/opensbc -xc'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0x0099fe0c in _int_malloc () from /lib/libc.so.6 (gdb) bt #0 0x0099fe0c in _int_malloc () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x009a16fe in malloc () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x001c6687 in operator new () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 #3 0x08338885 in PContainer::PContainer$base () #4 0x0833a94f in PAbstractArray::PAbstractArray$base () #5 0x082fd3f1 in PBaseArray<char>::PBaseArray$base () #6 0x083415b5 in PCharArray::PCharArray$base () #7 0x0833c4c6 in PString::PString () #8 0x0831aa2b in CanonicaliseFilename () #9 0x0831ab5b in PFilePath::AssignContents () #10 0x083197eb in PFilePath::operator= () #11 0x0831a8f8 in PFile::SetFilePath () #12 0x08316fad in PFile::Open () #13 0x08313881 in PIPSocket::GetRouteTable () #14 0x08313b24 in PIPSocket::GetGatewayAddress () #15 0x0820ec4c in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #16 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #17 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #18 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #19 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #20 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #21 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #22 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #23 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #24 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #25 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #26 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #27 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #28 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #29 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #30 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #31 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #32 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #33 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #34 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #35 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #36 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #37 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #38 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #39 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #40 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #41 0x0820ecaf in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () #42 0x0820f4ad in SIPTransports::SIPTransportManager::GetDefaultInterfaceAddress () ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-03-23 11:01:15
|
Hi Andrzej, I guess you have simply seen the limit of the OpenSIPStack real-time parser. I won't be surprised that Kamailo will have significantly higher CPS because it is doing lazy parsing. Meaning parse only the header significant to the current task. Since OpenSIPStack is a multi-purpose stack both catering to proxy and UA functionality I decided that real-time parsing (parse every headers as we get them) would be more desirable. Perhaps that was a wrong choice but it is something we have to work with. I will be dedicating 1.1.6 to significantly improve speed of the stack. Perhaps you have suggestions how to improve performance, I am all ears. Joegen -------------------------------------------------- From: "Andrzej 'The Undefined'Dopierała" <und...@ar...> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 6:01 PM To: "Joegen Baclor" <jb...@so...>; <ope...@li...> Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] poor performance of opensbc > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 06:10:16PM +0800, Joegen Baclor wrote: >> What you are seeing is the experimental pike mechanism which limits >> registrations to 5 CPS to augment a potential DoS attack. This is the >> reason why CPU is at normal level. I have recently disabled this in CVS. >> Can you try CVS head if you still encounter this problem? > cvs version works with circa 20 registers per second. When i do about 30 > registrations per seconds - retransmisions starts and opensbc has near > 100% cpu usage. It's real limit of opensbc? "real" platform based on > kamailio + radius + postgres works with near 500 registers per second ;) > >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Andrzej 'The Undefined'Dopierała" <und...@ar...> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:08 PM >> To: <ope...@li...> >> Subject: [OpenSBC] poor performance of opensbc >> >> > Hi >> > I have sip platform based on kamailio. It has performance near 500 >> > "REGISTER"s per second. >> > >> > I would like to put it behind opensbc to hide internal platform >> > structure. I use configuration like: >> > >> > [Internal-DNS-Mapping] >> > Internal-DNS-Map Array Size=1 >> > Internal-DNS-Map 1=[sip:sip.my.domain] sip:real-sip-server:5060 >> > >> > and opensbc is listed on port >> > >> > Interface-Address 1=my-real-ip:6060 >> > >> > It works, but... performance is very poor. When on "kamailio" platform >> > it's near 500 registers per seconds, when opensbc is on front of it- it >> > has only 3 registers per second. Systems aren't overloaded - circa 5% >> > cpu usage. >> > >> > -- >> > Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała >> > Linux && Unix && Network administrator >> > PLD Linux Developer HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/ >> > JID: und...@pi... e-mail: an...@do... >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are >> > powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly >> > and >> > easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based >> > development >> > software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. >> > Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >> > Ope...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >> >> >> >> > >> > No virus found in this incoming message. >> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> > Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.19/2011 - Release Date: >> > 03/19/09 >> > 07:05:00 >> > >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are >> powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and >> easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based >> development >> software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. >> Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com >> _______________________________________________ >> Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel >> > > -- > Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała > Linux && Unix && Network administrator > PLD Linux Developer HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/ > JID: und...@pi... e-mail: an...@do... > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.24/2017 - Release Date: 03/22/09 > 17:51:00 > |
|
From: Andrzej 'T. U. D. <und...@ar...> - 2009-03-23 10:01:12
|
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 06:10:16PM +0800, Joegen Baclor wrote: > What you are seeing is the experimental pike mechanism which limits > registrations to 5 CPS to augment a potential DoS attack. This is the > reason why CPU is at normal level. I have recently disabled this in CVS. > Can you try CVS head if you still encounter this problem? cvs version works with circa 20 registers per second. When i do about 30 registrations per seconds - retransmisions starts and opensbc has near 100% cpu usage. It's real limit of opensbc? "real" platform based on kamailio + radius + postgres works with near 500 registers per second ;) > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Andrzej 'The Undefined'Dopierała" <und...@ar...> > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:08 PM > To: <ope...@li...> > Subject: [OpenSBC] poor performance of opensbc > > > Hi > > I have sip platform based on kamailio. It has performance near 500 > > "REGISTER"s per second. > > > > I would like to put it behind opensbc to hide internal platform > > structure. I use configuration like: > > > > [Internal-DNS-Mapping] > > Internal-DNS-Map Array Size=1 > > Internal-DNS-Map 1=[sip:sip.my.domain] sip:real-sip-server:5060 > > > > and opensbc is listed on port > > > > Interface-Address 1=my-real-ip:6060 > > > > It works, but... performance is very poor. When on "kamailio" platform > > it's near 500 registers per seconds, when opensbc is on front of it- it > > has only 3 registers per second. Systems aren't overloaded - circa 5% > > cpu usage. > > > > -- > > Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała > > Linux && Unix && Network administrator > > PLD Linux Developer HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/ > > JID: und...@pi... e-mail: an...@do... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are > > powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and > > easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development > > software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. > > Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com > > _______________________________________________ > > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > > Ope...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > > Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.19/2011 - Release Date: 03/19/09 > > 07:05:00 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are > powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and > easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development > software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. > Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > -- Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała Linux && Unix && Network administrator PLD Linux Developer HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/ JID: und...@pi... e-mail: an...@do... |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-03-20 23:04:23
|
I do it all the time for development purposes. I must admit I haven't tried it in a production setting. I think you should start learning a bit of linux before you got this road though. I will be glad to answer your questions along the way. From: Bipin Patel Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 7:55 PM To: ope...@li... Subject: [OpenSBC] (no subject) hi, i was wondering if any1 has tried running opensbc under linux but using vmware or virtualbox under windows, now u might say u can simply use it on windows but the issue stands that its not currently working on windows 2003 server r2 so if any1 could help me run it on damn small linux in virtualbox or if some1 could create a live cd image of it using damn small linux coz im not much of a linux guy. -- Regards, Bipin www.xbipin.com +971-55-9270058 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.20/2013 - Release Date: 03/19/09 19:03:00 |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-03-20 22:59:33
|
Those two parameters are no longer active. I have decided that it is best that transactions and session event queues only use a single queue. I have recently made a lot of changes which significantly improved OpenSBC CPS rate since RC4. You might want to try the latest and see if you get more throughput from the latest version. Also make sure that the file handle limit is set to unlimited.
From: msp
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 11:21 PM
To: OSBC-Devel
Subject: [OpenSBC] OpenSBC is crashing in high CPS
Hi,
OpenSBC is setup to work in Hair pin mode. (Source code is slightly modified as my previous post)
I was doing stress testing, but performance is not as expected.
When I set CPS to 5 or more than 5 (just 5), OSBC Crashes when simultaneous calls reaches above 100.
I have set OSBC as:
Transaction-Thread-Count=100
Session-Thread-Count=100
So that it can handle more traffic. But it fails. (If above is not for this purpose, then let me know how to configure)
System Configuration :
Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz
4GB RAM
OS is Vyatta
OpenSBC version is: 1-1-5_RC4
Core files are being generated but when i try to see BT there is nothing there.
gdb corefile /path/to/opensbc
Will any body let me know What should do to get at least BT, so that we can see exact cause?
Thanks,
Shehzad
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list
Ope...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.20/2013 - Release Date: 03/19/09 19:03:00
|
|
From: msp <pm...@gm...> - 2009-03-20 15:21:26
|
Hi,
OpenSBC is setup to work in Hair pin mode. (Source code is slightly modified
as my previous post)
I was doing stress testing, but performance is not as expected.
When I set CPS to 5 or more than 5 (just 5), OSBC Crashes when simultaneous
calls reaches above 100.
I have set OSBC as:
*Transaction-Thread-Count=100
Session-Thread-Count=100*
So that it can handle more traffic. But it fails. (If above is not for this
purpose, then let me know how to configure)
*System Configuration :*
Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz
4GB RAM
OS is Vyatta
OpenSBC version is: 1-1-5_RC4
Core files are being generated but when i try to see BT there is nothing
there.
gdb corefile /path/to/opensbc
Will any body let me know What should do to get at least BT, so that we can
see exact cause?
Thanks,
Shehzad
|
|
From: Bipin P. <bi...@xb...> - 2009-03-20 12:21:26
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font size="-1"><font face="Arial">hi,<br> <br> i was wondering if any1 has tried running opensbc under linux but using vmware or virtualbox under windows, now u might say u can simply use it on windows but the issue stands that its not currently working on windows 2003 server r2 so if any1 could help me run it on damn small linux in virtualbox or if some1 could create a live cd image of it using damn small linux coz im not much of a linux guy.</font></font><br> <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- Regards, Bipin <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.xbipin.com">www.xbipin.com</a> +971-55-9270058</pre> </body> </html> |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-03-19 10:11:31
|
What you are seeing is the experimental pike mechanism which limits registrations to 5 CPS to augment a potential DoS attack. This is the reason why CPU is at normal level. I have recently disabled this in CVS. Can you try CVS head if you still encounter this problem? -------------------------------------------------- From: "Andrzej 'The Undefined'Dopierała" <und...@ar...> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:08 PM To: <ope...@li...> Subject: [OpenSBC] poor performance of opensbc > Hi > I have sip platform based on kamailio. It has performance near 500 > "REGISTER"s per second. > > I would like to put it behind opensbc to hide internal platform > structure. I use configuration like: > > [Internal-DNS-Mapping] > Internal-DNS-Map Array Size=1 > Internal-DNS-Map 1=[sip:sip.my.domain] sip:real-sip-server:5060 > > and opensbc is listed on port > > Interface-Address 1=my-real-ip:6060 > > It works, but... performance is very poor. When on "kamailio" platform > it's near 500 registers per seconds, when opensbc is on front of it- it > has only 3 registers per second. Systems aren't overloaded - circa 5% > cpu usage. > > -- > Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała > Linux && Unix && Network administrator > PLD Linux Developer HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/ > JID: und...@pi... e-mail: an...@do... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are > powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and > easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development > software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. > Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com > _______________________________________________ > Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.238 / Virus Database: 270.11.19/2011 - Release Date: 03/19/09 > 07:05:00 > |
|
From: Andrzej 'T. U. D. <und...@ar...> - 2009-03-18 09:24:12
|
Hi I have sip platform based on kamailio. It has performance near 500 "REGISTER"s per second. I would like to put it behind opensbc to hide internal platform structure. I use configuration like: [Internal-DNS-Mapping] Internal-DNS-Map Array Size=1 Internal-DNS-Map 1=[sip:sip.my.domain] sip:real-sip-server:5060 and opensbc is listed on port Interface-Address 1=my-real-ip:6060 It works, but... performance is very poor. When on "kamailio" platform it's near 500 registers per seconds, when opensbc is on front of it- it has only 3 registers per second. Systems aren't overloaded - circa 5% cpu usage. -- Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała Linux && Unix && Network administrator PLD Linux Developer HomePage: http://andrzej.dopierala.name/ JID: und...@pi... e-mail: an...@do... |
|
From: msp <pm...@gm...> - 2009-03-17 06:15:56
|
Hi Joegen, These tests are done on vyatta os installed on Vmware virtual system. OpenSBC is running in Hairpin scenario as my previous post on: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=9A0D3E787D1C4C118F5C5D94C4615EDE%40opteron&forum_name=opensipstack-osbcdevel I am not sure about CPS, but it should be between 10 to 20. Memory usage is: Used 50 to 90 MB, Free 450 to 410 MB. CPU load is also normal : Between 30 to 50 % I had no idea how to check IO. Yesterday i tried CVS version, but it was not accepting any calls at all. I think it require some configuration related to authentication. I am now going to test RC4 on another physical system (with vyatta os), for making sure that is the problem with virtual system or not. Thanks Shehzad |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-03-16 02:12:56
|
Hi Shehzad, I have made a couple of critical bug fixes to OpenSIPStack transaction layer. Can you upgrade and let me know if > 30 CPS would still crash OpenSBC? Joegen From: Joegen Baclor Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 7:32 AM To: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [OpenSBC] opensbc get crashed on increasing test calls I find 30 channels a bit off. We are running hundreds of simultaneous calls on OpenSBC every day for GRN VoIP traffic so I am sure it could handle more than that. Are you running OpenSBC in a hairpin scenario? What's you CPS rate? Resource consumption on your box such as mem, io and cpu consumptions would also be very helpful. I don't find anything wrong with the changes you made in the source. From: msp Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 10:16 PM To: OSBC-Devel Subject: [OpenSBC] opensbc get crashed on increasing test calls Hi, My modified OpenSBC-1-1-5_RC4 is getting crashed when I increase simultaneous calls to more than 30. I have started the opensbc using below command: /usr/local/bin/opensbc -d -p /var/run/opensbc.pid -H 65536 -C 1024000 Only changes in the code I have done can be seen on the link: http://pastebin.com/m7bfd3b27 (It just add a custom header variable before routing the call, Let me know if any serious thing is going in the coding) I tried to solve this using gdb, but there is no back trace found when i try to debug using below command: gdb core.<###> /path/to/opensbc =====================================Command output .... This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu"... Cannot access memory at address 0xb7f1a658 (gdb) bt #0 0xb7eeb7db in ?? () Cannot access memory at address 0xb24feca0 =================================================== Is there any configuration/options required while compiling opensbc, so that I can get BT correctly? Also kindly comment if the changes are not proper. I tested RC3 also, but same happens there. Which is the most stable version of OpenSBC, so that I can try that also? Thanks, Shehzad -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.13/2000 - Release Date: 03/13/09 18:00:00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.13/2000 - Release Date: 03/13/09 18:00:00 |
|
From: Joegen B. <jb...@so...> - 2009-03-14 23:33:23
|
I find 30 channels a bit off. We are running hundreds of simultaneous calls on OpenSBC every day for GRN VoIP traffic so I am sure it could handle more than that. Are you running OpenSBC in a hairpin scenario? What's you CPS rate? Resource consumption on your box such as mem, io and cpu consumptions would also be very helpful. I don't find anything wrong with the changes you made in the source. From: msp Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 10:16 PM To: OSBC-Devel Subject: [OpenSBC] opensbc get crashed on increasing test calls Hi, My modified OpenSBC-1-1-5_RC4 is getting crashed when I increase simultaneous calls to more than 30. I have started the opensbc using below command: /usr/local/bin/opensbc -d -p /var/run/opensbc.pid -H 65536 -C 1024000 Only changes in the code I have done can be seen on the link: http://pastebin.com/m7bfd3b27 (It just add a custom header variable before routing the call, Let me know if any serious thing is going in the coding) I tried to solve this using gdb, but there is no back trace found when i try to debug using below command: gdb core.<###> /path/to/opensbc =====================================Command output .... This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu"... Cannot access memory at address 0xb7f1a658 (gdb) bt #0 0xb7eeb7db in ?? () Cannot access memory at address 0xb24feca0 =================================================== Is there any configuration/options required while compiling opensbc, so that I can get BT correctly? Also kindly comment if the changes are not proper. I tested RC3 also, but same happens there. Which is the most stable version of OpenSBC, so that I can try that also? Thanks, Shehzad -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.13/2000 - Release Date: 03/13/09 18:00:00 |
|
From: msp <pm...@gm...> - 2009-03-14 14:17:20
|
Hi, My modified OpenSBC-1-1-5_RC4 is getting crashed when I increase simultaneous calls to more than 30. I have started the opensbc using below command: /usr/local/bin/opensbc -d -p /var/run/opensbc.pid -H 65536 -C 1024000 Only changes in the code I have done can be seen on the link: http://pastebin.com/m7bfd3b27 (It just add a custom header variable before routing the call, Let me know if any serious thing is going in the coding) I tried to solve this using gdb, but there is no back trace found when i try to debug using below command: gdb core.<###> /path/to/opensbc =====================================Command output .... This GDB was configured as "i486-linux-gnu"... Cannot access memory at address 0xb7f1a658 (gdb) bt #0 0xb7eeb7db in ?? () Cannot access memory at address 0xb24feca0 =================================================== Is there any configuration/options required while compiling opensbc, so that I can get BT correctly? Also kindly comment if the changes are not proper. I tested RC3 also, but same happens there. Which is the most stable version of OpenSBC, so that I can try that also? Thanks, Shehzad |
|
From: Joegen B. <joe...@gm...> - 2009-03-14 01:46:31
|
First, download the latest from CVS. I have recently moved the transport listeners to its own section in the admin (SIP-Transports). It would allow you to specify the interface address and port to be used by the back-door. Whe you trombone/hairpin back the call to OpenSBC, make sure that it is routed through the backdoor (default 5062) and not through the main transport listener (default 5060). This would allow the backdoor to change the call-id making it possible for OpenSBC to treat the call separately from the original call. Joegen From: msp Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 11:45 PM To: OSBC-Devel Subject: [OpenSBC] How to eliminate MERGED REQUEST error Hi all, I have done below setup by minor modification in OSBC code. ------>| OpenSBC | ----------> | OpenSIP | <------| | <---------- | | When calls come from outside net to OSBC, OSBC adds the IP address of source in custom SIP header variable "SRC-URI" (for that I done minor midificaiton in SBCRoutingHandler.cxx) and route the call to OpenSIP. OpenSIP find out route based on custom SIP header variable "SRC-URI", and add the destination URI as custom SIP header variable "SBC-Force-Route", route the call back to OpenSBC. So that OpenSBC should route the call to uri set in "SBC-Force-Route" variable. But when I tested with sample calls, OSBC route the call to OpenSIP that part work well, but when call comes from OpenSIP (by SBC-Force-Route set to proper URI), OSBC does not route the call, and end up with below messages: ======================================================================== 2009/03/13 15:05:40.394 DTL: [CID=0x0ba2] Event: ---> Inbound - INVITE sip:1010@192.168.1.81:5060 SIP/2.0 2009/03/13 15:05:40.394 DBG: [CID=0x0ba2] *** MESSAGE ARRIVAL *** for SIP Session 7c15bd8907fcb0251b2bbbd47301ca1d@192.168.1.23-0x001e 2009/03/13 15:05:40.394 ERR: [CID=0x0ba2] *** MERGED REQUEST DETECTED ***INVITE sip:1010@192.168.1.81:5060 SIP/2.0 2009/03/13 15:05:40.395 INF: [CID=0x0ba2] *** NO ROUTE ** URI sip:1010@192.168.1.81:5060through local registration database =================================================================================== I have attached whole log in pastebin, you can find it on link: http://pastebin.com/f1f3a843b What should I do to eliminate error "Merged Request..."? Thanks, Shehzad -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Opensipstack-osbcdevel mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/opensipstack-osbcdevel -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.12/1998 - Release Date: 03/12/09 18:23:00 |
|
From: msp <pm...@gm...> - 2009-03-13 15:46:05
|
Hi all, I have done below setup by minor modification in OSBC code. ------>| OpenSBC | ----------> | OpenSIP | <------| | <---------- | | When calls come from outside net to OSBC, OSBC adds the IP address of source in custom SIP header variable "SRC-URI" (for that I done minor midificaiton in *SBCRoutingHandler.cxx*) and route the call to OpenSIP. OpenSIP find out route based on custom SIP header variable "SRC-URI", and add the destination URI as custom SIP header variable "SBC-Force-Route", route the call back to OpenSBC. So that OpenSBC should route the call to uri set in "SBC-Force-Route" variable. But when I tested with sample calls, OSBC route the call to OpenSIP that part work well, but when call comes from OpenSIP (by SBC-Force-Route set to proper URI), OSBC does not route the call, and end up with below messages: ======================================================================== *2009/03/13 15:05:40.394 DTL: [CID=0x0ba2] Event: ---> Inbound - INVITE sip:1010@192.168.1.81:5060 SIP/2.0 2009/03/13 15:05:40.394 DBG: [CID=0x0ba2] *** MESSAGE ARRIVAL *** for SIP Session 7c15bd8907fcb0251b2bbbd47301ca1d@192.168.1.23-0x001e 2009/03/13 15:05:40.394 ERR: [CID=0x0ba2] *** MERGED REQUEST DETECTED ***INVITE sip:1010@192.168.1.81:5060 SIP/2.0 2009/03/13 15:05:40.395 INF: [CID=0x0ba2] *** NO ROUTE ** URI sip:1010@192.168.1.81:5060through local registration database =================================================================================== I have attached whole log in pastebin, you can find it on link: *http://pastebin.com/f1f3a843b What should I do to eliminate error "Merged Request..."? Thanks, Shehzad |
|
From: Joegen B. <jb...@so...> - 2009-02-08 03:10:04
|
Hi Guys, Why don't you send me your OpenSBC.ini file , call flow diagram together with the level 5 log. I have been pretty busy with other stuffs recently and it is not intentional for me to neglect this thread. Please email me the log directly. The forum isn't friendly to the logging format of opensbc. MY email address is jo...@op.... Joegen |
|
From: OpenSBC F. <ope...@op...> - 2009-02-07 14:54:33
|
Hi I am setting OpenSBC using Upper Registration. My Upper Registrar is Asterisk. I am having problem because clients are getting are request timed out error. My logs show 222.1xx.1x.1xx = SBC IP 6x.1x.1xx.1xx = asterisk IP To: "oliver-xlite-home" <sip:8236@222.1xx.1x.1xx> 2009/02/07 09:47:15.706 DBG: [CID=0x6f2137a6] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.2:30209;branch=z9hG4bK-d87543-59159861b91ee754-1--d87543-;rport=30209;received=121.54.29.23 2009/02/07 09:47:15.706 DBG: [CID=0x6f2137a6] CSeq: 3 REGISTER 2009/02/07 09:47:15.706 DBG: [CID=0x6f2137a6] Call-ID: NDQyMGRiZGE5NjNjMWViNDliNmY2YzZlOWFmYTFjNjg. 2009/02/07 09:47:15.706 DBG: [CID=0x6f2137a6] Contact: <sip:8236@6x.1x.1xx.1xx> 2009/02/07 09:47:15.706 DBG: [CID=0x6f2137a6] User-Agent: Asterisk PBX 2009/02/07 09:47:15.706 DBG: [CID=0x6f2137a6] Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY 2009/02/07 09:47:15.706 DBG: [CID=0x6f2137a6] Content-Length: 0 My Upper Registration Config All-Reg-As-Upper-Reg=True Enable-Stateful-Reg=False Rewrite-TO-Domain=True Rewrite-FROM-Domain=False Route-List Array Size=1 Route-List 1=[sip:*] sip:6x.1x.1xx.1xx:5060 |
|
From: OpenSBC F. <ope...@op...> - 2009-02-07 07:03:05
|
I tried this again with a fresh installation of FreeBSD 7.1 and the latest CVS version and got the same result.... 2009/02/06 21:44:52.882 PWL: [CID=0x00000000] PWLib Assertion fail: Function ::close failed, file tlibthrd.cxx, line 876, Error=9 Dumping core. Abort trap (core dumped) Here is the new version of opensbc which I used: ./opensbc -v Product Name: OpenSBC Manufacturer: opensipstack.org Version : 1.1.5-75 System : FreeBSD-i386 7.1-RELEASE Release-Date: Feb 6 2009 21:40:57 Anyone have any clues? /Simon |
|
From: Richard E. N. <r....@gm...> - 2009-02-07 02:43:38
|
|
From: OpenSBC F. <ope...@op...> - 2009-02-07 02:32:24
|
I would be nice to test same OpenSBC setup with other registrar like OpenSER or SipX. Might be a bug of Asterisk SIP stack ? |
|
From: OpenSBC F. <ope...@op...> - 2009-02-07 01:19:36
|
Any development? I still can't get it to work.... |
|
From: OpenSBC F. <ope...@op...> - 2009-02-06 16:33:31
|
I've just test with Asterisk 1.6.0.1 and the OpenSNC CVS ! Nothing ! Doesn't works ... What we have missed ... |
|
From: OpenSBC F. <ope...@op...> - 2009-02-06 14:44:01
|
My Asterisk and OpenSBC have public IP address. I need OpenSBC just for nat outbound proxy. |
|
From: OpenSBC F. <ope...@op...> - 2009-02-06 14:27:41
|
My kind of setup is not discussed on that site. They use SBC their as outbound proxy. Do you still get the same result? |
|
From: OpenSBC F. <ope...@op...> - 2009-02-06 14:18:41
|
Might be this can help us http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/SipXecs-OpenSBC_Setup_Guide_for_Different_Call_Scenario |
14 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
