From: Dirk R. <dre...@ia...> - 2005-06-03 13:43:39
|
Hi Chad, On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 03:24 -0500, Chad Austin wrote: > Dirk Reiners wrote: > >[snip] > > > > As far as I can see, that would allow us to keep winsock out of all our > > headers. Marcus, is that right? > > OSGSocketSelection.h and OSGSocketAddress.h still need winsock to be included at > the moment. pImpl* would be a good way around that. > > * http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/024.htm Yeah, those two look very pimpleable. ;) I would appreciate getting rid of winsock, because it doesn't look like there's really a solution, somebody will always complain about either compromise. Who wants to tackle it? Dirk |