Re: [Opensg-core] Implementing Material== ?

[Dirk R. <dre...@ia...>]

	Hi folks,

On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 12:11, Chad Austin wrote:
> Hm, it seems kind of silly to have to repeatedly call MergeGraphOp.  This also 
> means that you can't just merge all geometry by adding a single MergeGraphOp to 
> the loader's GraphOpSeq.  

to be honest I'm a little surprised that it makes a difference. That
sounds like there's a bug in the MergeGraphOp, as I can't see how it
could miss something that it finds on the second run.

> Would anyone be opposed to adding:
> 
> 	size_t c;
> 	do {
> 	    c = countNodes(node);
> 	    traverse(node);
> 	} while (c > countNodes(node));
> 
> to the MergeGraphOp traverse?

I'm okay with adding it as a workaround, but please add a comment about
it being a bug in waiting.

Thanks

	Dirk