From: vince j. <v.j...@nt...> - 2005-01-25 20:45:16
|
Hi Dirk and Adreas, Thanks for the replies. My current requirements for xml are not very = stringent either at the moment, and xmlpp does the job, as long as you = are aware of the bugs:) Another question: I heard there might be a 'light' version of osg = produced with much smaller dll's, or only using the parts of the library = that are needed - is this true? I have an application that I would = consider converting to osg if I could dramatically reduce the size of = the current distribution. Regards, Vince. btw - sorry about the html in my original post :( |