Re: [Openscrobbler-devel] Ruby on Rails

[Mr. D. <mr...@gm...>]

Based on minor bits of research, it would appear that ror, while fantastic=
=20
for quick / agile development, has not yet been really tested for large=20
scale things as we hope this will one day be.=20

FastCGI looks good though, so does mod_ruby. Ultimately, you understand the=
=20
intricacies of the performance dilemma far better than I do, so you should=
=20
make the decision. Personally, I'm pro RoR.=20

On 7/13/05, Jonathan Dance <jd...@wu...> wrote:
>=20
> Any thoughts on doing OpenScrobbler in Ruby on Rails (RoR)? It might
> give us new incentive to work on it, and it means we could probably
> start faster (the framework I was working on in PHP is, basically, RoR).
>=20
> Downside: RoR is not as widely available, and is generally slower and
> would require at least some system software optimization (i.e.
> mod_ruby and/or FastCGI for Ruby or something); also, don't know
> about availability of things like memcache libraries for RoR.
>=20
> --JD
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net <http://SF.Net> email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!=
'=20
> webinar happening
> July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
> core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by=
=20
> HP,
> AMD, and NVIDIA. To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> _______________________________________________
> Openscrobbler-devel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openscrobbler-devel
>=20



--=20
- deep