|
From: Ludovic R. <lud...@gm...> - 2015-04-03 13:10:05
|
2015-04-03 11:28 GMT+02:00 建明 <jia...@12...>: > HI, Gulik > > thanks for reply. > as you mentioned , >>>> > we’ve fixed it by hardcoding it to 2048 for a specific case >>>> > > I don't quite understand. can you share the patch? I guess that what Dirk did is replace: return 128; by return 256; 2048 = 256 * 8. 2048 bits is 256 bytes. If you can submit a patch to dynamically select the key size that would be perfect. Bye -- Dr. Ludovic Rousseau |