|
From: Zoran M. <zor...@er...> - 2013-12-05 15:04:45
|
Summary: IMM: Implementation of NO_DANGLING flag [#49]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 49
Peer Reviewer(s): Neelakanta, Anders
Pull request to: Zoran
Affected branch(es): default(4.4)
Development branch: default(4.4)
--------------------------------
Impacted area Impact y/n
--------------------------------
Docs n
Build system n
RPM/packaging n
Configuration files n
Startup scripts n
SAF services y
OpenSAF services n
Core libraries n
Samples n
Tests n
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
---------------------------------------------
changeset 262748c382d21cb6ec391e1b1fcf4a8a1e6256ae
Author: Zoran Milinkovic <zor...@er...>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:56:17 +0100
IMM: API support for NO_DANGLING flag [#49]
IMM API support for reference integrity (NO_DANGLING flag)
changeset 121f26d8504c86c63643c03bb81840460e66a69b
Author: Zoran Milinkovic <zor...@er...>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:57:11 +0100
IMM: IMM service implementation of NO_DANGLING flag [#49]
Implementation of reference integrity (NO_DANGLING flag) to IMMSV
changeset 68c4e3d7d6b3c3a501c20903fc63d9ba8a125420
Author: Zoran Milinkovic <zor...@er...>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 15:58:25 +0100
IMMTOOLS: Add support of NO_DANGLING flag to IMM tools [#49]
Support reference integrity (NO_DANGLING flag) to IMM tools
Added Files:
------------
osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_13.h
osaf/services/saf/immsv/schema/SAI-AIS-IMM-XSD-A.02.13.xsd
Complete diffstat:
------------------
osaf/libs/agents/saf/imma/imma_om_api.c | 36 ++++-
osaf/libs/common/immsv/include/immpbe_dump.hh | 2 +-
osaf/libs/common/immsv/include/immsv_api.h | 9 +
osaf/libs/saf/include/Makefile.am | 3 +-
osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_12.h | 2 +
osaf/libs/saf/include/saImmOm_A_2_13.h | 60 +++++++++
osaf/libs/saf/libSaImm/Makefile.am | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/immsv/immloadd/imm_loader.cc | 8 +-
osaf/services/saf/immsv/immloadd/imm_pbe_load.cc | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmAttrValue.cc | 6 +
osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmAttrValue.hh | 2 +
osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmModel.cc | 950 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
osaf/services/saf/immsv/immnd/ImmModel.hh | 37 +++++-
osaf/services/saf/immsv/schema/SAI-AIS-IMM-XSD-A.02.13.xsd | 180 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
osaf/tools/safimm/immcfg/imm_import.cc | 2 +
osaf/tools/safimm/immdump/imm_xmlw_dump.cc | 9 +
osaf/tools/safimm/immlist/imm_list.c | 3 +
17 files changed, 1231 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
Testing Commands:
-----------------
Testing, Expected Results:
--------------------------
The patches need to support:
- immload support for NO_DANGLING flag
- immdump support for NO_DANGLING flag
- immcfg support for NO_DANGLING flag (immcfg -f)
- immlist support for NO_DANGLING flag (NO_DANGLING flag is listed)
- IMM library support for NO_DANGLING (classCreate - basic checks)
- schema update (adding and removing NO_DANGLING flag)
- default values
- create object (NO_DANGLING attributes with and without values)
- modify object (add, replace and delete)
- delete object
- CCB apply
- CCB abort/terminate
- support for missing objects, created later within the same CCB
Conditions of Submission:
-------------------------
Ack from Neelakanta and Anders
Arch Built Started Linux distro
-------------------------------------------
mips n n
mips64 n n
x86 n n
x86_64 n n
powerpc n n
powerpc64 n n
Reviewer Checklist:
-------------------
[Submitters: make sure that your review doesn't trigger any checkmarks!]
Your checkin has not passed review because (see checked entries):
___ Your RR template is generally incomplete; it has too many blank entries
that need proper data filled in.
___ You have failed to nominate the proper persons for review and push.
___ Your patches do not have proper short+long header
___ You have grammar/spelling in your header that is unacceptable.
___ You have exceeded a sensible line length in your headers/comments/text.
___ You have failed to put in a proper Trac Ticket # into your commits.
___ You have incorrectly put/left internal data in your comments/files
(i.e. internal bug tracking tool IDs, product names etc)
___ You have not given any evidence of testing beyond basic build tests.
Demonstrate some level of runtime or other sanity testing.
___ You have ^M present in some of your files. These have to be removed.
___ You have needlessly changed whitespace or added whitespace crimes
like trailing spaces, or spaces before tabs.
___ You have mixed real technical changes with whitespace and other
cosmetic code cleanup changes. These have to be separate commits.
___ You need to refactor your submission into logical chunks; there is
too much content into a single commit.
___ You have extraneous garbage in your review (merge commits etc)
___ You have giant attachments which should never have been sent;
Instead you should place your content in a public tree to be pulled.
___ You have too many commits attached to an e-mail; resend as threaded
commits, or place in a public tree for a pull.
___ You have resent this content multiple times without a clear indication
of what has changed between each re-send.
___ You have failed to adequately and individually address all of the
comments and change requests that were proposed in the initial review.
___ You have a misconfigured ~/.hgrc file (i.e. username, email etc)
___ Your computer have a badly configured date and time; confusing the
the threaded patch review.
___ Your changes affect IPC mechanism, and you don't present any results
for in-service upgradability test.
___ Your changes affect user manual and documentation, your patch series
do not contain the patch that updates the Doxygen manual.
|