From: Richard G. <ri...@rd...> - 2012-04-30 01:05:15
|
I don't think this would be possible. OpenRocket uses interpolation from experimental data of different nose cone shapes in the aerodynamics calculations. Simulating an arbitrary nose cone would require going to a full comupational fluid dynamics simulation. -- Richard On 04/29/2012 07:42 AM, Kevin Ruland wrote: > Hi Sampo, > > I noticed while fixing bugs in the NoseCone (actually Transition) > integrate() method which computes volume, mass, wet area, cg, and a > bunch of critical parameters, that the method is not really limited to > the handful of shapes currently used. Would OpenRocket be able to > support custom nose cone shapes using a list of points (radii) similar > to the custom fin set? Would the aerodynamics still be valid? Could it > support nose cones with unusual shapes (Honest John, blunted conicals > come to mind)? > > Seems like this would be a nice feature in support of component > presets. I've found a number of low power nose cones which are unusual > - though still symmetric. > > Kevin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Openrocket-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openrocket-devel |