Re: [openorb-devel] status and harmony

[<lak...@t-...>]

FYI, here is the response I just received from Greg:

It [the relevant mail from Intalio] was never followed up. 
It was taking a long time, a lot of effort, and
interest in moving it was simply lost. I don't know the
state of the project now, or Intalio's interests at this point.

Cheers,
-g




Lars Kühne wrote:

> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>> High community activity is a requirement, which is where OpenORB 
>> could stand to improve.  However, this community can initiate the 
>> move whereby the project would wait in the incubator until a few 
>> simple requirements, such as community activity, are met.  Is there 
>> still a license issue w/ Intalio?
>>
>
> All current commiters have an CLA with Apache, but for quite some time 
> Intalio and the ASF could not agree on the license model 
> (http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2003/board_minutes_2003_04_16.txt) 
>
>
> In Nov 2003 Intalio changed it's position, but AFAIK the license 
> transfer has not been finalized, hence my mail to Greg Stein.
>
> /Lars