|
From: Neil S. <nl...@ya...> - 2025-10-22 17:52:00
|
On Wednesday, October 22, 2025 at 09:17:47 AM PDT, Paul Fertser <fer...@gm...> wrote: > Looks like it's an artifact of very early years of development, see > e.g. 4411c2643e41d023a1909b1040361912422be6c0 which supports your idea > that developers thought every scan should end in a stable state. > > All the drivers you mentioned are very rarely used for JTAGing these > days and there's hardly much motivation anyone has to try to improve > their performance. > > I see I removed that code from J-Link driver 10 years ago: > ae8cdc139e12a851107e8f882c5a166a21103ad4 hah :) so it's not just a > performance issue but also a problem for FPGA/CPLD interactions. Thank you for your insight. What is the most commonly used JTAG hardware these days with OpenOCD? Neil. |