From: Xiaofan C. <xia...@gm...> - 2014-06-02 08:26:20
|
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Xiaofan Chen <xia...@gm...> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:53 AM, Ram Bhamidipaty <ra...@ra...> wrote: >> How hard would it be to make OpenOCD build with visual studio? Would that be >> a worthwhile goal? >> >> I am willing to do this work - but I don't know if this would be considered >> valuable by the project. >> > > If you want to do that, you may want (and need) to work on the dependencies > first. > > For libusb Windows, MSVC is 1st class citizen along with GCC so > there are no problems. > > For libusb-win32, MSVC is 1st class citizen as well so there are > no problems either. MinGW is supported only to build the Oops, sending too fast. for libusb-win32, MinGW is supported only to build the dynamic import library and the example program. MinGW-w64 will work as well to build the dynamic import library and the example programs. Both will not work for building the driver and the driver installer (using WDK). > For HIDAPI, I believe it should be okay as well since it supposedly > support WDK build (never tried it myself). > > For libftdi, last time I tried, there are a few issues to get it build > under MSVC but should not be that difficult to fix. > > Not so sure about jimtcl. > -- Xiaofan |