From: Ram B. <ra...@ra...> - 2014-06-02 04:13:47
|
On 06/01/14 20:40, Paul Fertser wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:53:06PM -0700, Ram Bhamidipaty wrote: >> How hard would it be to make OpenOCD build with visual studio? Would that be a >> worthwhile goal? > It would be impossible without massive modifications as MSVC doesn't > support C99. I do not see why anyone might want it. Right - I forgot about that. > >> I am willing to do this work - but I don't know if this would be considered >> valuable by the project. > What's your motivation here? > My impression is that the Windows build with Cygwin was a bit hard to duplicate. A while back (maybe 2 years) there were discussions on the list about the exact set of packages that were needed to build OpenOCD. It seemed (at that time) that creating a reproducible windows build environment was not so simple. Perhaps MinGW is easier? If that is no longer true - then there would be no need for this. And it may not matter since the C99 issue would be too much work. -Ram I woul |