|
From: <zw...@ma...> - 2009-05-26 03:27:59
|
Author: zwelch
Date: 2009-05-26 03:27:56 +0200 (Tue, 26 May 2009)
New Revision: 1915
Modified:
trunk/src/svf/svf.c
Log:
SimonQian <sim...@Si...>, reported by R.Doss:
This patch fixes a segfault when TDO was not received in XXR command:
- allocate space for the value and mask anyway
- clear the mask to zero to effectively skip the output comparison step
Modified: trunk/src/svf/svf.c
===================================================================
--- trunk/src/svf/svf.c 2009-05-26 01:22:23 UTC (rev 1914)
+++ trunk/src/svf/svf.c 2009-05-26 01:27:56 UTC (rev 1915)
@@ -918,6 +918,27 @@
}
buf_set_ones(xxr_para_tmp->mask, xxr_para_tmp->len);
}
+ // If TDO is absent, no comparison is needed, set the mask to 0
+ if (!(xxr_para_tmp->data_mask & XXR_TDO))
+ {
+ if (NULL == xxr_para_tmp->tdo)
+ {
+ if (ERROR_OK != svf_adjust_array_length(&xxr_para_tmp->tdo, i_tmp, xxr_para_tmp->len))
+ {
+ LOG_ERROR("fail to adjust length of array");
+ return ERROR_FAIL;
+ }
+ }
+ if (NULL == xxr_para_tmp->mask)
+ {
+ if (ERROR_OK != svf_adjust_array_length(&xxr_para_tmp->mask, i_tmp, xxr_para_tmp->len))
+ {
+ LOG_ERROR("fail to adjust length of array");
+ return ERROR_FAIL;
+ }
+ }
+ memset(xxr_para_tmp->mask, 0, (xxr_para_tmp->len + 7) >> 3);
+ }
// do scan if necessary
if (SDR == command)
{
|