|
From: Laurent G. <lau...@am...> - 2010-11-03 15:21:16
|
> > Laurent Gauch wrote: > >/ Having external Jim TCL is not so bad, > / > I think it's an important improvement. > > > >/ we have to make sure the compile step stays as easy as possible on > />/ Windows as on Linux and Mac ! > / > I don't agree. Windows is pretty much a useless development > environment as-is, That's your point of view ... but, for me, this is a user point of view and not a developer point of view . my 2c. > and it's not really the task of openocd or > any other project to work around that. > As you say, it should not be the task of openocd developers and any other developer of any other software to play with OS, but having easy build solution for Multi-OS (Windows / Linux / Mac ...) is a big plus for the success of an open source project as the openocd. > MSYS and Cygwin are significantly better environments, and they work > much like a *ix systems. Big improvement, and many of the same > methods can be used across all operating systems thanks to them. > Yes, but do not confuse the "how-to" build and "how-to" use !!! We build openocd for Windows under Cygwin and then we use openocd binary on Windows without the need of Cygwin ... > > >/ This is not the case for the actual external Jim TCL . > / > When there's no package management (like on Windows) dependencies > will always mean that some extra effort and care is required to build > a package. I don't think this is a reason to keep a copy of all > dependencies within projects. > So why jimtcl directory in OpenOCD ? > If you can help make it easier to build the two packages then please > go for it and send a patch. > > Thanks! > Thanks. Laurent http://www.amontec.com |