|
From: Laurent G. <lau...@am...> - 2010-11-03 13:25:39
|
> > >/ I think we do not need to have any 'make install' for JIM TCL, > />/ since we want JIM TCL embedded in the openocd project. > / > As you may already know, if a project uses autotools then the build > is not completed without make install. > > I would suggest to set --prefix for jim to a subdir of the openocd > dir. > This is not the trouble here. Jim TCL compiles OK in openocd/jimtcl, but then we are not able to link jim for compiling openocd. > > >/ The jim include paths and jim lib paths directly should be added in > />/ the 'configure' of openocd. > / > As you may already know, configure is a generated file, and nothing > should be added to it. The source for configure is configure.in. sorry for my configure, I want thinking configure.in as input file. > It > could assume that jim was built and installed into some default > prefix, but really, since jim is standalone, it would make sense to > me to have it installed separately in the system even if it is linked > statically into openocd. > Yes, but having jim as standalone make a new dependency for openocd project :-( ! With new version control of jim TCL ... > > //Peter > Laurent http://www.amontec.com |