Re: [Openocd-development] License

[Thomas A. M. <to...@mo...>]

LMAO

That could be said for a lot of the recent messages on this list!

A very LOW signal to Noise ratio

Lets start talking about solutions

tom

On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 23:27 +0000, Photo Leecher wrote:
> People can already do what you say... They can merge+build the latest
> and use FTDI2xx.
> Amount of information: 0
> 
>  
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> From: Thomas A. Moulton <to...@mo...>
> To: Photo Leecher <pho...@ya...>
> Cc: ope...@li...
> Sent: Wednesday, 24 June, 2009 0:24:09
> Subject: Re: [Openocd-development] License
> 
> On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 22:59 +0000, Photo Leecher wrote:
> > Your copy would have the exception because you got revision X.
> > Revision X+1 would not, and therefore you wouldn't be able to
> > distribute FTDI2XX any longer as part of >= X+1.
> >  
> > People who want to keep revision X 5 years later can do so, but
> would
> > no longer get the latest-and-greatest code.
> > 
> I could merge any patches I wanted to and release...
> 
> Like I said it would be complex.. That was my only point
> 
> tom
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openocd-development mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development