From: Moshe B. <mo...@ql...> - 2002-02-28 18:25:53
|
So, let's use 1.5.1 then. My 1.5.1 has GPL still in it. It's also great if you can reverse engineer this stuff back into track. Moshe > -----Original Message----- > From: David Santo Orcero [mailto:ir...@or...] > Sent: 28 febbraio, 2002 18.54 > To: Moshe Bar > Cc: 'mulix'; ope...@to...; > ope...@li...; rei...@me... > Subject: RE: [Openmosix-general] New version of userland tools > > > > > Hello, Moshe! > > Reid (mailto:rei...@me...) has pointed to me > that his version of Mosix 1.5.2 has on the header of the code > the announce that the code is GPLed. He downloaded the code > 12/12/2001. I had dowloaded my 1.5.2 some weeks later, and in > my version, there was not that announce. That means that the > licence of userland tools was changed in some moment at the > end of december or beggining of January. > > On the doubt, I am going to use 1.5.1. As far as userland > tools did not evolved too much on last year, I think that > there will be no problem. In a couple of days you will have > here a version of OpenMosix with all the code GPLed. > > > In the long-run we should probably re-write everything anyway, but > > then we would have to do reverse engineering (which > legally, at this > > point, I could not do). So, at the end of the day, re-writing > > (including the > > I can. In Spain, it is legal reverse engeneering, so far it > is done for reverse compatibility purposes. > > Yours: > > David > > > --------------------------- > David Santo Orcero > ir...@or... > http://www.orcero.org/irbis > --------------------------- > > > |