[Openjmx-devel] Re: openjmx:description and jmx:mbean xdoclet tags

[Carlos Q. <car...@we...>]

On Tuesday 05 February 2002 00:55, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> > > @jmx:mbean defines things that are related to the spec.  Its presence
> > > indicates that a MyServiceMBean interface will be created for the
> > > MyService class.  the extends parameter specifies an interface for the
> > > MyServiceMBean interface to extend.
> >
> > Ok, so @jmx:mbean will ONLY take a extends parameter, no name, no
> > description
>
> sorry.  no, @jmx:mbean does take a name and description parameter.
And then what does the name parameter do?

>
> > > @openjmx:description defines things that are related to the openjmx
> > > description adaptor class.  The absense of it means that all defaults
> > > will be followed for the openjmx description class.  Its extends
> > > parameter allows the description class to extend a specific class -
> > > this class should itself extend the openjmx abstract description class.
> > >  If it is not there, and the MyService class extends FooService, then
> > > the
> >
> > Is it that the class extends FooService or that the @jmx:mbean has
> > parameter extends="FooService". The latter seems the correct to me
>
> sorry - yes, its if the @jmx:mbean has the extends paramter.  my bad.
>
> > > MyServiceMBeanDescription class will extend FooServiceMBeanDescription
> > > (are they the right class names?).  If there is no
> > > @openjmx:descriptione extends="" _and_ MyService doesn't extend
> > > anything, then
> > > MyServiceMBeanDescription will simply extend the OpenJMX abstract
> > > description class (sorry - cant remember the name).
> >
> > it is MBeanDescriptionAdaptor
>
> ta
>
> cheers
> dim