Re: [Openjmx-devel] [Fwd: JMX work, and CustomerBMPBean]

[Carlos Q. <car...@we...>]

On Monday 04 February 2002 23:07, Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> Ok - have a look in XDoclet CVS.
>
> example usage:
>
> /**
>  * Sample MBean implementation.
>  * @jmx:mbean name=3D":service=3DMyService" description=3D"My wonderful=
 service."
>  * @openjmx:description extends=3D"AbstractMBeanDescription"
>  */
>
> Over next weekend, I'll get the XDoclet side of the docs done so that t=
his
> is all a little bit more "proper" (o:
Thanks a lot Dimitri...

What is the name in jmx:mbean doing? Do you still have the jmx:mbean exte=
nds?

I can't build it from CVS because of some serialveruid classes which don'=
t=20
compile, any idea?=20


Regards

>
> cheers
> dim
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "J=E9r=F4me BERNARD" <jer...@xt...>
> To: <ope...@li...>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [Openjmx-devel] [Fwd: JMX work, and CustomerBMPBean]
>
>
> Sounds good for me too.
>
> Jerome.
>
> Carlos Quiroz wrote:
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:di...@bi...]
> >>Sent: 04 February 2002 13:47
> >>To: J=E9r=F4me BERNARD; ope...@li...
> >>Subject: Re: [Openjmx-devel] [Fwd: JMX work, and CustomerBMPBean]
> >>
> >>Given that the description class is specific to OpenJMX and the
> >
> >interface
> >
> >>is
> >>a spec thing, I would suggest keeping the current tag for the usual
> >>scenario
> >>(as you described), but allowing an optional @openjmx:description
> >>extends=3D""
> >>for overriding this default behaviour.
> >>
> >>if you guys are agreeable with this I can check it into XDoclet cvs
> >>straight
> >>away.
> >
> >I think this would be pretty OK
> >
> >>cheesr
> >>dim
> >>
> >>----- Original Message -----
> >>From: "J=E9r=F4me BERNARD" <jer...@xt...>
> >>To: <ope...@li...>
> >>Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:20 PM
> >>Subject: Re: [Openjmx-devel] [Fwd: JMX work, and CustomerBMPBean]
> >>
> >>Carlos Quiroz wrote:
> >>>On Sunday 03 February 2002 20:43, J=E9r=F4me BERNARD wrote:
> >>>>What bug do you have?
> >>>>
> >>>>I think there a no changes planned in XDoclet. We will just add an
> >>
> >>example
> >>
> >>>>and that's it.
> >>>>So if there is still something wrong, let me know and I will fix it
> >
> >ASAP.
> >
> >>>Again with the extend=3D"XXX" which is expanded on the MBeanDescript=
ion
> >>
> >>class
> >>
> >>>to extends XXXMBeanDescription
> >>>
> >>>Now thinking a second time about it is maybe be design, is it? But
> >>
> >>assumes
> >>
> >>>that your extended interface also has a Description class
> >>
> >>Yes. This is a design reason. I supposed that the class which would b=
e
> >>extended would be a MBeanDescription class too. This is also because =
I
> >>found it easier to have only one extends attribute on the jmx:mbean
> >
> >tag
> >
> >>rather than having two (one for the interface and one for the
> >>description) because I think that most of the cases will have a
> >>description extending another one.
> >>
> >>What would you prefer/propose to do?
> >>
> >>Jerome.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Openjmx-devel mailing list
> >>Ope...@li...
> >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjmx-devel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>Openjmx-devel mailing list
> >>Ope...@li...
> >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjmx-devel
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Openjmx-devel mailing list
> >Ope...@li...
> >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjmx-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openjmx-devel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjmx-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openjmx-devel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjmx-devel