Re: [Openjmx-devel] [Fwd: JMX work, and CustomerBMPBean]

[B. <jer...@xt...>]

Sounds good for me too.

Jerome.

Carlos Quiroz wrote:

>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:di...@bi...]
>>Sent: 04 February 2002 13:47
>>To: J=E9r=F4me BERNARD; ope...@li...
>>Subject: Re: [Openjmx-devel] [Fwd: JMX work, and CustomerBMPBean]
>>
>>Given that the description class is specific to OpenJMX and the
>>
>interface
>
>>is
>>a spec thing, I would suggest keeping the current tag for the usual
>>scenario
>>(as you described), but allowing an optional @openjmx:description
>>extends=3D""
>>for overriding this default behaviour.
>>
>>if you guys are agreeable with this I can check it into XDoclet cvs
>>straight
>>away.
>>
>I think this would be pretty OK
>
>>cheesr
>>dim
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "J=E9r=F4me BERNARD" <jer...@xt...>
>>To: <ope...@li...>
>>Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:20 PM
>>Subject: Re: [Openjmx-devel] [Fwd: JMX work, and CustomerBMPBean]
>>
>>
>>Carlos Quiroz wrote:
>>
>>>On Sunday 03 February 2002 20:43, J=E9r=F4me BERNARD wrote:
>>>
>>>>What bug do you have?
>>>>
>>>>I think there a no changes planned in XDoclet. We will just add an
>>>>
>>example
>>
>>>>and that's it.
>>>>So if there is still something wrong, let me know and I will fix it
>>>>
>ASAP.
>
>>>Again with the extend=3D"XXX" which is expanded on the MBeanDescriptio=
n
>>>
>>class
>>
>>>to extends XXXMBeanDescription
>>>
>>>Now thinking a second time about it is maybe be design, is it? But
>>>
>>assumes
>>
>>>that your extended interface also has a Description class
>>>
>>Yes. This is a design reason. I supposed that the class which would be
>>extended would be a MBeanDescription class too. This is also because I
>>found it easier to have only one extends attribute on the jmx:mbean
>>
>tag
>
>>rather than having two (one for the interface and one for the
>>description) because I think that most of the cases will have a
>>description extending another one.
>>
>>What would you prefer/propose to do?
>>
>>Jerome.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Openjmx-devel mailing list
>>Ope...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjmx-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Openjmx-devel mailing list
>>Ope...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjmx-devel
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Openjmx-devel mailing list
>Ope...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjmx-devel
>