Re: [Openjmx-devel] [Fwd: JMX work, and CustomerBMPBean]

[Carlos Q. <car...@ge...>]

Hi J=E9r=F4me=20

This is really, really good. I had never used xdoclet before and I'm very=
=20
impressed. I think I'll move all my MBeans to use xdoclet

Regards


>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: JMX work, and CustomerBMPBean
>Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 00:59:15 +1100
From: "Dmitri Colebatch" <di...@oz...>
>To: <xdo...@li...>
>CC: J=E9r=F4me BERNARD <jer...@xt...>
>
>
>
>
>hey all,
>
>=20
>
>firstly - I've just checked in Jerome Bernard's JMX work from the=20
>OpenJMX project, and put the first beta of openjmx in the lib directory=20
>to enable the openjmx specific stuff to compile.  the tags are:
>
>=20
>
>class level:
>
>  jmx:mbean extends=3D"" description=3D""
>
>=20
>
>method level:
>
>  jmx:managed-constructor description=3D""
>
>  jmx:managed-constructor-parameter postition=3D"" name=3D"" description=
=3D""
>
>=20
>
>  jmx:managed-attribute description=3D""
>
>=20
>
>  jmx:managed-operation description=3D""
>
>  jmx:managed-operation-parameter postition=3D"" name=3D"" description=3D=
""
>
>=20
>
>ok - its only a first cut, I changed a few things, so it will probably=20
>need a little more work (tomorrow night) after Jerome has a look at my=20
>changes.  but it should work, hav ea look at the samples.
>
>=20
>
>secondly - CustomerBMPBean seems to be breaking, something to do with=20
>the dataobject.  Anyone else seeing this?  I had a super quick look, but=
=20
>couldn't spot the cause.  could someone give me a sanity check?
>
>=20
>
>cheers
>
>dim
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Openjmx-devel mailing list
>Ope...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjmx-devel
>