RE: [Openjmx-devel] RMI adaptor and remote notifications

[Bronwen C. <Bro...@ja...>]

Agreed 3 sounds the best
Bronwen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carlos Quiroz [mailto:Car...@ge...]
> Sent: 30 January 2002 13:16
> To: OpenJMX-Dev (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [Openjmx-devel] RMI adaptor and remote notifications
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bordet, Simone [mailto:Sim...@co...]
> > Sent: 30 January 2002 15:16
> > To: Carlos Quiroz; OpenJMX-Dev (E-mail)
> > Subject: RE: [Openjmx-devel] RMI adaptor and remote notifications
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > > > I've added possibility to receive in the client 
> notifications from
> a
> > > > remote MBeanServer.
> > > >
> > > > Listeners are always remote, but NotificationFilters may be
> > > serialized
> > > to
> > > > the server and be executed there.
> > > >
> > > > Is there any preference on how filters must be treated ?
> > > >
> > > > 1) Always as remote, like listeners (will be executed in the
> client)
> > > > 2) Always serialized to the server (will executed in the server)
> > > I'm sure this is a lot more Network efficient
> > >
> > > > 3) try first with 2, if fails fall through to 1
> > > When may this happen?
> > 
> > When filter implementation is not serializable.
> Ok, then my vote is for 3
> 
> > 
> > Simon
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openjmx-devel mailing list
> Ope...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjmx-devel
>