RE: [Openjmx-users] jmxdoclet generation of MBean subclass

[Bordet, S. <Sim...@co...>]

Hi Jason,

> I've only been playing with MBeans for the last couple of=20
> days now, so=20
> excuse me if this is a stupid question.  RTFM with a link=20
> would be fine too.
>=20
> I have:
>=20
> class A implements AMBean { ... }
> class B extends A implements BMBean { ... }
>=20
> and xdoclet generates:
>=20
> interface AMBean { ... }
> interface BMBean { ... }
>=20
> If my understanding is correct, all attributes/operations that B=20
> inherits from A must also be defined in BMBean.  Everything works as=20
> expected when I change BMBean to:
>=20
> interface BMean extends AMBean { ... }
>=20
>=20
> How do I get jmxdoclet to generate this or equivalent for me?=20
>  I kinda=20
> expected it to look in super and pull the @jmx tags.

It really can be an XDoclet bug.
As you know, OpenJMX changed its name to MX4J, so also XDoclet should be
corrected to reflect the new packages. I will do this today and in the
next days and I will fix also this problem.

Thanks for your attention

Simon