From: Petr O. <pt...@is...> - 2007-08-08 05:31:55
|
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 16:06, Karl Eichwalder wrote: > Petr Ovtchenkov <pt...@is...> writes: > > >> > Looks like no development a long time; so this question lost sense. > >> > HEAD not coherent with last branch where development was. > > I think it would be fine to tag the HEAD and create a branch from it > (say opensp_20070807_head_branch). Then copy the opensp_1_5_branch to > the HEAD and make it the default development branch. > The last activity was in opensp_1_5_branch, and this was base branch for last public release. I'm expect that HEAD not used too long, so no reasons to spend efforts on it. That's why I made branch SP_STL from opensp_1_5_branch. I can repeat my suggestion about transition from CVS to SVN on SF. I expect many benefits in code managements from this transition. - Petr |