|
From: Ian C. <ian...@op...> - 2002-10-21 19:04:38
|
Doxygen is licenced under the GPL. It is inspired by, and in some ways derives from doc++. I believe it is better than doc++ and more versatile! The web site is at http://www.doxygen.org=20 On Monday 21 October 2002 15:09, Javier Farreres de la Morena wrote: > The documentation results are quite nice. > During this time I was examining the different options that were pointe= d > out in the list, and I found doc++ as a package distributed into debian= =2E > This means it is open source. As someone in the list explained it was a > good tool, Cristian is studying it and starting to put his documentatio= n > with doc++. > > I don't mean that the tool selected is doc++. I think we should study t= he > best option. Perhaps trying them all as a test could be interesting to = see > which offers us the best options. > > The documentation from doxigen is quite nice, but how easy is it to > introduce the comments into the code as to generate the documentation? > > My main interest is that the documentation tool be also an open source > tool. What about doxigen? Is it opensource? doc++ is. > > As I have explained, Cristian is studying doc++, but he hasn't introduc= ed > the comments as yet. If I tell him to use doxigen he will do, but he wi= ll > need a good documentation and the tool installed in his computer (free > cost, of course). > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > OpenJade-devel mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openjade-devel |