From: Sean D. <se...@da...> - 2004-12-15 19:18:11
|
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 06:29:06PM +0100, Pierre Sangouard wrote: > Well this is not a feature request but could the hotswap issues that I > raised in my yesterday's email titled "Hotswap code issues" be addressed = for > 2.0? >=20 Can you raise bugs for these issues? Nothing is going in without bugs at this point. Feel free to assign them to me. I'd like to keep the allowed_transition function, but just fix the logic in there (getting the logic out of the inline code is a bit nicer IMHO.) As for the other issues, I think they are valid as well. Question: is there a conformance test to push those scenarios? Items with conformance tests behind them are getting higher priority. -Sean --=20 __________________________________________________________________ Sean Dague Mid-Hudson Valley sean at dague dot net Linux Users Group http://dague.net http://mhvlug.org There is no silver bullet. Plus, werewolves make better neighbors than zombies, and they tend to keep the vampire population down. __________________________________________________________________ |