From: Patrice D. <per...@fr...> - 2008-02-01 20:08:43
|
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:05:53PM -0500, Arlindo da Silva wrote: > On Feb 1, 2008 7:38 AM, Jennifer Adams <jm...@co...> wrote: > > > Arlindo, Could you please make a change to your gacfg.c and/or your > > configure scripts in your v2 branch so that users and developers will be > > able to distinguish between a COLA build and and Opengrads build? > > > > So far I have changed the version string in configure.ac from "2.0.a0" to " > 2.0.a0-1". Perhaps I should have something more explicit such as " > 2.0.a0-1.oga" It is not a good idea to have - in the version string. What is the most classical is a mixed digit and . (in ascii ascending order, please :-). But adding a special tag for the opengrads build would be right, given that these are more or less parallel versions. So something like 2.0.0.oga. > Pat: how are you labeling the versions in Fedora? We use what 'upstream' provides. In any case I may package opengrads or COLA grads depending on which one is the most on the bleeding edge, but I won't package both at a given time. Version strings that are in the ascending ascii order are much easier to use for packaging. There is an additional release number we use to track the changes in the package but it is not relevant for you. -- Pat |