From: Patrice D. <per...@fr...> - 2008-02-01 09:22:23
|
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 02:24:05AM -0500, Arlindo da Silva wrote: > > Pat: can you check whether I captured all your dynamic supplib mods? In > particular, check m4/grib2.m4. The new HDF requirement may be particularly > challenging for you on Fedora as it requires a non-standard build of HDF-4 No it won't be challenging since we already use --disable-netcdf... In fact it is sometime required to be able to link with hdf and netcdf together, first time it came in was for gdal (or grass), on Wed Feb 8 2006. > (--disable-netcdf). Do you know who maintains HDF-4 on Fedora? If you cannot I comaintain HDF4 on fedora with Orion Poplawski. > have 2 versions of the HDF-4 library supported on fedora one solution may be > to drop NetCDF altogether as in the old days of v1.5 (or was it 1.6? Hoop > will remember) and let the standard HDF do the reading for both NetCDF and > HDF. Apparently HDF4.2r2 supports the NetCDF-3 API, if not I have a wrapper > library that could be useful. It supports the NetCDF-3 API but does it support the netcdf files? Anyway there is support for both hdf4 builds with enable-dyn-supplibs (in hdf4.m4). If a build with sd_ appended (--disable-netcdf) is detected hdf2netcdf.h is included (to be seen in configure.ac). -- Pat |