|
From: Bernhard G. <Ber...@ic...> - 2008-09-04 20:24:56
|
>>>>> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 07:08:07 +0200 (CEST)
>>>>> "HN" == Håkan Nilsson <ha...@ch...> wrote:
HN> Hi, I agree with Martin.
HN> I have the patch version installed. I had no problems with
HN> it. I can't use the git version at the moment. I think that
HN> since the git version adds new features (and bugs), it should
HN> be considered as an experimental state of the code. There is
HN> also a need for a code that is only bug-fixed, and hopefully
HN> becoming more and more stable.
Well. The incident (breaking of one of my codes) was solved (quite an
easy thing).
Nevertheless. My current problem is that I use the patch branch to
upgrade our "production"-installation. So my fear is that during
upgrading I will break the OF installation and all runs that will be
scheduled on our cluster after that will fail (until I discover the
mistake). So I guess I'll have to have a test-installation that I
apply patches to before upgrading the production version.
How do you deal with issues like that?
HN> So, I hope that you are willing to continue with the patched
HN> version for a while.
I will. And I will have a closer look at the stuff that comes from the
git before commiting it
Only problem is, that currently the patch is rather large because
there are changes between 1.5 and the first revision in the git (so
the git itself can't be used to patch an installation the
patch-version does) so patching currently takes a rather long time
BTW: what I am impressed with is the speed of GIT for downloading
HN> At least it would be good to maintain a list of bug fixes, and
HN> where to find the updated code.
HN> Håkan.
HN> On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Martin Beaudoin wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here is my feedback:
>>
>>
>>> To evaluate what the future options for the patch-branch
>>> should be I'm relying on feedback:
>>>
>>> - is the patch-branch actually used?
>>
>>
>> Yes. At IREQ, we keep both the dev and the patched version
>> available.
>>
>>
>>> - were there problems with it in the past?
>>
>>
>> No. You are doing a pretty fine job at maintaining this part of
>> openfoam-extend Bernhard.
>>
>>
>>> - should it be abandoned in favour of the git-archive?
>>>
>> Not yet.
>>
>> Let's see how the git archive is maintained and evolving first.
>>
>> The quality will have to improve. Missing patches and broken
>> code is not what I call quality.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>
>>
>>> Bernhard
>>>
>>> Footnotes: [1]
>>> http://www.opencfd.co.uk/openfoam/download.html#download
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move
>>> Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based
>>> applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is
>>> a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
>>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openfoam-extend-general mailing list
>>> Ope...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openfoam-extend-general
>>>
>>
HN> -- Håkan.
HN> Note that my e-mail address has changed to ha...@ch....
HN> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
HN> | Håkan Nilsson | | | Ph.D., Assistant Professor | Tel:
HN> (+46)31-772 1414 | | Applied mechanics, Fluid Dynamics | Fax:
HN> (+46)31-18 09 76 | | Chalmers University of Technology |
HN> E-mail: ha...@ch... | | SE-412 96 Gothenburg | Homepage:
HN> | | SWEDEN | http://www.tfd.chalmers.se/~hani |
HN> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DI Bernhard F.W. Gschaider
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EMail: Ber...@ic...
WWW : www.ice-sf.at
Jabber : bgs...@ja...
Tel: +43(3842)98282-42 Fax: +43(3842)98282-02
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|