|
From: Vincenzo Di S. <e.d...@ic...> - 2002-01-01 17:33:19
|
Juli=E1n Mu=F1oz Dom=EDnguez wrote: > In general I like Openflow 5.0, but I have seen some problems for the "= day > to day": >=20 > Now the applications are in a separate tab. Here we could have, say, 40 > applications: it would be nice to see the "Tittle" (a commment) about t= his > application. Yes it`s a good idea. > The same for activities: but maybe there is no space ??? But what is mo= re > important from a point of view os usability, see the tittle, or see if = the > activity is XOR or AND (not sure myself, what do you think?) IMO, we should give all the informations about the objects. For the=20 moment we aren`t paying attention on the templates, because our priority=20 now is the code, so they may appear incomplete or not well structured. =20 > And now, the biggest usability problem (in my case): >=20 > With previous I had a problem with the names: > To avoid problems, I had to give a different name to the Activity and t= o > the URL of the application (the method). >=20 > Now with Openflow 5.0 I have also to "invent" a name for the > application... > I have to invent 3 names: the activity, the application, and the > called method name. >=20 > In practice it would be much more easy if I could use the same name. >=20 > Illuminate me, maybe it is not a problem now with the new object model = ?? You can give the same name to the differt objects, because they`re URLs a= re usually different, but this may cause confusion when you need to maintain your workflow application. Try appending suffix= as "abc_activity" or "abc_app" etc... --=20 Vincenzo Di Somma - Responsabile Ricerca e Sviluppo - Icube S.r.l. Sede: Via Ridolfi 15 - 56124 Pisa (PI), Italia E-mail: e.d...@ic... WWW: www.icube.it Tel: (+39) 050 97 02 07 Fax: (+39) 050 31 36 588 |