|
From: Vincenzo Di S. <e.d...@ic...> - 2001-12-19 13:18:32
|
I don`t know exactly what we`ll do probabily we`ll separate the two=20 repositories. But it`s just my personal idea, for the moment. However is our intention to obtain with the 0.6 release a good and=20 stable workflow tool so all users who don`t want to use CMF for the=20 moment, will have a good workflow support, and all products developed=20 till now will work well. Juli=E1n Mu=F1oz Dom=EDnguez wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, Vincenzo Di Somma wrote: >=20 >=20 >>We`ll freeze the stand alone development after the 0.6 release. >>If someone will want to take over OpenFlow when it will migrate to >>CMF... we'll be glad to help and contribute on the development. >> >=20 > Ok very interesting. Who knows, maybe people (including me) interested = in > Openflow will install CMF for this reason :-) >=20 > Ok, it is cool to have this clear. The idea is for not loosing this las= t > "CMF non-dependant" product. Then me, or someone else, could maintain i= t, > maybe in another sourceforge developpment group ? Just in case the CMF > dependant product isn't satisfactory for own use... Who knows, we don't > close this possibily, ok ?? >=20 > In theory CVS supports this "multibranch" feature, but then I suppose a= ll > must be maintained in the same sourceforge developpment group. (But is = it > a good /real possibility ?) >=20 > Uhmm, or will it all be migrated to the CMF CVS ?? >=20 > And then, how could independant cvs feeds easily with the new features > added in OpenFlow-CMF ? >=20 >=20 >=20 --=20 Vincenzo Di Somma - Responsabile Ricerca e Sviluppo - Icube S.r.l. Sede: Via Ridolfi 15 - 56124 Pisa (PI), Italia E-mail: e.d...@ic... WWW: www.icube.it Tel: (+39) 050 97 02 07 Fax: (+39) 050 31 36 588 |