From: Joerg H. <jo...@sd...> - 2002-11-21 15:00:19
|
Hi, jspaar wrote: >>From: Joerg Hansmann <jo...@sd...> ... > If nothing else we could include a link to the Olimex design. However > the Olimex cables would be a more complicated to build than the sp12. > > A dumb question - aside from using different software, would the serial and > parallel designs both be compatible? (They both say STKxxx compatible.) If the modularEEG ICSP (in circuit serial programming) interface is changed from the SP12 compatible layout(*) to the Atmel STKxxx compatible layout, you have the choice to use the olimex serial programming cable (avr-pg1b.pdf) with PonyProg or the olimex parallel programming cable (avr-pg2b.pdf) with AVR ISP. You even could modify the current SP12 compatible programming cable so that it is compatible with the Atmel STKxxx compatible layout and use the SP12 software. > [BTW, is anyone else having big delays getting mail from sourceforge?] How much delay do you get? I guess my delay is less than an hour. Regards, Joerg (*) In fact this layout was recommended in the document:"ATMEL AVR910 In-System Programming" (doc0943.pdf) on page 2 fig. 2 The original SP12 programmer does not use the 2x3 pin header contact at all. "... Figure 2. The Recommended In-System Programming Interface Connector Layout. Figure 2 shows the connector used by all Atmel In-System programmers to connect to the target system. The standard connector supplied is a 2x3 pin header contact, with pin spacing of 100 mils. ..." For some reason ATMEL seemingly has decided to change this recommended layout to the new one used in the STKxxx. |