Re: [Openclips-development] Documentation License

[Thomas S. <ths...@gm...>]

On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:36:34 -0700, Tim Cook <tw...@sh...> wrote:
> I have placed a copy of the FDL and the appropriate copyright statement
> to insert into your documentation for this project in the Docs section
> on SourceForge.
> 
> Cheers,
> Tim

The FDL?

Isn't there supposed to be a lot of controversy over the FDL and just
how non-free it is? Are the debian people still frothing at the mouth
over it? If they are, they probably won't ship OpenCLIPS (or they'll
just re-write our documentation if they do).

On the BWCLIPS front: it builds against TCL/TK though I'm not sure
which is in control, so to speak. Actually, strike that, CLIPS is
using Tcl_Eval to do stuff to widgets, so I'm guessing the user
interface is in TCL/TK and the CLIPS engine is in control (much/most
of the time).

It is also missing a file clsltpsr.c and mentions modifying line 263
in the 'fish translation of the README.

I couldn't find any file header comments, never mind anything that
looked like a copyright statement in any of the files I looked at.

Cheers,
Thomas Sutton