My name is Matthew Vita, a programmer in the healthcare industry. I am trying to help build up the high impact "List of open-source health software" Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-source_health_software) and would love to add your software to the list. However, it appears that your project does not have a page on Wikipedia so I ask you to consider the following:
1) Adding a nice article for your project (see the GNU Health article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Health) for a really good example and Ginkgo CADx (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginkgo_CADx) for a lightweight, but acceptable example).
2) Adding said article to "List of open-source health software" Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-source_health_software).
(If you’re already on Wikipedia, my search-fu wasn’t working when I looked you up so please consider doing only step 2 above)
Thanks,
Matthew
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I just wanted to follow up with a few words in regards to Conflict of Interest (COI). As you can imagine, I have been reaching out to all kinds of mature, reputable, and active open source healthcare projects to help build up this Wikipedia list. However, some project members have (rightly) reached out to me with concerns about COI, so I wanted to clear this up as best as I can. I should first note that my role in this process is of a neutral party that is solely acting in the interests of Wikipedia readers that wish to learn about open source healthcare solutions.
Wikipedia defines COI as "contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships. Any external relationship can trigger a conflict of interest." They also go on to say that organizations writing about themselves is a COI.
If you meet one or more of those criteria, I suggest reaching out to a neutral party in your project's community to put together the article. If you do not meet any of those criteria, I suggest putting together an article with material that places the interest of the encyclopedia and its reader above all else.
Assuming you don't have a COI, I encourage you to do as other open source healthcare projects have done by creating a neutral article about the project with the help of the community (users, developers, and subject matter experts) as well as reliable references.
For whatever it's worth, my personal opinion is that if you don't have a COI, it is rather easy to write up an article talking about the software's features, history, usage, and milestones all while being neutral.
Thanks,
Matthew Vita
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Thanks for your interest about OpenClinic, Matthew.
OpenClinic Project does not have a Wikipedia entry. If you could link your
comment about app with official project page (openclinic.sf.net), I would
appreciate it.
I just wanted to follow up with a few words in regards to Conflict of
Interest (COI). As you can imagine, I have been reaching out to all kinds
of mature, reputable, and active open source healthcare projects to help
build up this Wikipedia list. However, some project members have (rightly)
reached out to me with concerns about COI, so I wanted to clear this up as
best as I can. I should first note that my role in this process is of a
neutral party that is solely acting in the interests of Wikipedia readers
that wish to learn about open source healthcare solutions.
Wikipedia defines COI as "contributing to Wikipedia about yourself,
family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other
relationships. Any external relationship can trigger a conflict of
interest." They also go on to say that organizations writing about
themselves is a COI.
If you meet one or more of those criteria, I suggest reaching out to a
neutral party in your project's community to put together the article. If
you do not meet any of those criteria, I suggest putting together an
article with material that places the interest of the encyclopedia and its
reader above all else.
Assuming you don't have a COI, I encourage you to do as other open source
healthcare projects have done by creating a neutral article about the
project with the help of the community (users, developers, and subject
matter experts) as well as reliable references.
For whatever it's worth, my personal opinion is that if you don't have a
COI, it is rather easy to write up an article talking about the software's
features, history, usage, and milestones all while being neutral.
Dear Maintainers,
My name is Matthew Vita, a programmer in the healthcare industry. I am trying to help build up the high impact "List of open-source health software" Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-source_health_software) and would love to add your software to the list. However, it appears that your project does not have a page on Wikipedia so I ask you to consider the following:
1) Adding a nice article for your project (see the GNU Health article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Health) for a really good example and Ginkgo CADx (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ginkgo_CADx) for a lightweight, but acceptable example).
2) Adding said article to "List of open-source health software" Wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_open-source_health_software).
(If you’re already on Wikipedia, my search-fu wasn’t working when I looked you up so please consider doing only step 2 above)
Thanks,
Matthew
Dear Maintainers,
I just wanted to follow up with a few words in regards to Conflict of Interest (COI). As you can imagine, I have been reaching out to all kinds of mature, reputable, and active open source healthcare projects to help build up this Wikipedia list. However, some project members have (rightly) reached out to me with concerns about COI, so I wanted to clear this up as best as I can. I should first note that my role in this process is of a neutral party that is solely acting in the interests of Wikipedia readers that wish to learn about open source healthcare solutions.
Wikipedia defines COI as "contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, clients, employers, or your financial and other relationships. Any external relationship can trigger a conflict of interest." They also go on to say that organizations writing about themselves is a COI.
If you meet one or more of those criteria, I suggest reaching out to a neutral party in your project's community to put together the article. If you do not meet any of those criteria, I suggest putting together an article with material that places the interest of the encyclopedia and its reader above all else.
Assuming you don't have a COI, I encourage you to do as other open source healthcare projects have done by creating a neutral article about the project with the help of the community (users, developers, and subject matter experts) as well as reliable references.
For whatever it's worth, my personal opinion is that if you don't have a COI, it is rather easy to write up an article talking about the software's features, history, usage, and milestones all while being neutral.
Thanks,
Matthew Vita
Thanks for your interest about OpenClinic, Matthew.
OpenClinic Project does not have a Wikipedia entry. If you could link your
comment about app with official project page (openclinic.sf.net), I would
appreciate it.
Best regards.
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:36 AM, Matthew Vita matthewvita@users.sf.net
wrote:
I need help about downloading and intalling openclinic ,