Re: [opencbm-user] Errors compiling opencbm on Linux.
Brought to you by:
strik
|
From: Spiro T. <cb...@tr...> - 2007-10-31 19:54:25
|
Hello Luca, * On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 07:55:43AM +0100 gr...@gm... wrote: > Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > > Is there a config.h nor the autoconf.h file in the linux/ directory? > > That is, in /usr/src/linux/include/linux/? > > Yes, there is autoconf.h: > > luca@c65:/usr/src/linux/include/linux$ ll | grep auto > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 44263 2007-07-14 11:11 autoconf.h > > > Are the headers exactly the ones used for you running machine? > > Yes. No, they are not: > > 2. The names of ALL installed debian packages that start with linux-... > > You may get this info from aptitude. > > luca@c65:/usr/src/linux/include/linux$ dpkg -l | grep linux > ii libselinux1 2.0.15-2+b1 > SELinux shared libraries > ii libselinux1-dev 2.0.15-2+b1 > SELinux development headers > ii linux-kbuild-2.6.22 2.6.22-1 > Kbuild infrastructure for Linux 2.6.22 > ii linux-libc-dev 2.6.22-5 > Linux Kernel Headers for development > ii linux-sound-base 1.0.15-1 > base package for ALSA and OSS sound systems > ii linux-source-2.6.18 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12 > Linux kernel source for version 2.6.18 with > ii linux-source-2.6.20 2.6.20-2 > Linux kernel source for version 2.6.20 with > ii linuxdoc-tools 0.9.21-0.11 > convert LinuxDoc SGML source into other form > ii linuxdoc-tools-latex 0.9.21-0.11 > LaTeX/PS/PDF output facility of LinuxDoc-Too > ii linuxdoc-tools-text 0.9.21-0.11 > Text output facility of LinuxDoc-Tools > ii util-linux 2.13-9 > Miscellaneous system utilities > ii util-linux-locales 2.13-9 > Locales files for util-linux > luca@c65:/usr/src/linux/include/linux$ I am missing the linux-headers-2.6.20 (or similar) package. The linux-source package only contains the source, but it misses the specific headers that were generated for building your own kernel. On the other hand: I am missing the linux-image-2.6.20 package, too. Did you compile your kernel on your own, or did you use a prebuilt one? > p.s. The patch number 1722924 seems to be regarding this error, but it > also seems to be committed already to the "0.4.0 bug fix branch" tagged > version. Exactly, it is already included there. Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://opencbm.sf.net/ http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://www.viceteam.org/ |