From: Michael B. <mic...@cm...> - 2003-05-16 09:52:02
|
Hi all, aside from the bugs and missing features it looks like the documentation is the biggest problem (like for the most Open Source projects). We have an OpenCA guide and there is a first structure for systematical tests (attached) but the docs are sometimes outdated, really difficult to manage and the users cannot update the docs if they find a mistake. So what can we do to improve the docs? I think the most important step is the integration of the documentation in the CVS and make infrastructure. Is it a good idea to create the following structure? openca-0.9/doc/test/ - stuff of the attachment openca-0.9/doc/guide/ - OpenCA guide openca-0.9/doc/scripts/ - here we could place operational scripts and how to operate a ca (perhaps we should call it howto/) The test stuff is completely latex. The OpenCA guide was written with texmacs but it exports latex too. We have to rework the code a little bit but I think it is a good idea to switch from TeXmacs to pure latex to make it more compatible and easier to maintain by different people. This directory includes also the lifecycle image (tex-source). The third directory should be used to store examples like Harald's installation instructions or some operational scripts which describes step by step what a admin has to do if he wants to handle a request. Every howto or script set would get it's own directory. Any comments please? Michael P.S. after this we could reorganize the OpenCA guide :) -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Bell Email: mic...@cm... ZE Computer- und Medienservice Tel.: +49 (0)30-2093 2482 (Computing Centre) Fax: +49 (0)30-2093 2704 Humboldt-University of Berlin Unter den Linden 6 10099 Berlin Email (private): mic...@we... Germany http://www.openca.org |