From: Curro F. R. <cur...@gm...> - 2011-08-08 11:04:47
|
Dear all, I'm trying to find documentation on how to test USSD support in OpenBTS. Could anyone tell me how can I test this feature? Thanks and best regards, Curro. |
From: Ivan K. <klu...@gm...> - 2011-08-11 14:25:51
Attachments:
TestsForUSSD.txt
|
Hi, You should use USSD branch from official OpenBTS git repository. Find short description of the USSD test sequence attached. Going through the whole test set you'll be able to test almost all modes of USSD in different states. 2011/8/8 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: > Dear all, > > I'm trying to find documentation on how to test USSD support in OpenBTS. > Could anyone tell me how can I test this feature? > > Thanks and best regards, > Curro. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA > The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. > Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. > Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 > _______________________________________________ > Openbts-discuss mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > > -- Regards, Ivan Klyuchnikov. |
From: Curro F. R. <cur...@gm...> - 2011-08-12 08:57:48
|
Thanks. Does that branch support for USRPs UHD? Thank you, Curro. On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > You should use USSD branch from official OpenBTS git repository. > Find short description of the USSD test sequence attached. > Going through the whole test set you'll be able to test almost all > modes of USSD in different states. > > > 2011/8/8 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: > > Dear all, > > > > I'm trying to find documentation on how to test USSD support in OpenBTS. > > Could anyone tell me how can I test this feature? > > > > Thanks and best regards, > > Curro. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA > > The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. > > Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. > > Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save! > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 > > _______________________________________________ > > Openbts-discuss mailing list > > Ope...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Ivan Klyuchnikov. > -- Curro Fornés |
From: Curro F. R. <cur...@gm...> - 2011-08-12 09:12:28
|
Hi, Could you please tell me what is the official git repository for OpenBTS? Thanks, Curro. On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Curro Fornes Rumbao < cur...@gm...> wrote: > Thanks. > > Does that branch support for USRPs UHD? > > Thank you, > Curro. > > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm...>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> You should use USSD branch from official OpenBTS git repository. >> Find short description of the USSD test sequence attached. >> Going through the whole test set you'll be able to test almost all >> modes of USSD in different states. >> >> >> 2011/8/8 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >> > Dear all, >> > >> > I'm trying to find documentation on how to test USSD support in OpenBTS. >> > Could anyone tell me how can I test this feature? >> > >> > Thanks and best regards, >> > Curro. >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA >> > The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. >> > Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. >> > Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save! >> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Openbts-discuss mailing list >> > Ope...@li... >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >> > > > > -- > Curro Fornés > -- Curro Fornés |
From: Ivan K. <klu...@gm...> - 2011-08-12 10:21:41
|
Hi, You can use git clone git://openbts.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/openbts/openbts 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: > Hi, > Could you please tell me what is the official git repository for OpenBTS? > Thanks, > Curro. > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Curro Fornes Rumbao > <cur...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Thanks. >> Does that branch support for USRPs UHD? >> Thank you, >> Curro. >> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm...> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> You should use USSD branch from official OpenBTS git repository. >>> Find short description of the USSD test sequence attached. >>> Going through the whole test set you'll be able to test almost all >>> modes of USSD in different states. >>> >>> >>> 2011/8/8 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >>> > Dear all, >>> > >>> > I'm trying to find documentation on how to test USSD support in >>> > OpenBTS. >>> > Could anyone tell me how can I test this feature? >>> > >>> > Thanks and best regards, >>> > Curro. >>> > >>> > >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA >>> > The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. >>> > Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. >>> > Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save! >>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Openbts-discuss mailing list >>> > Ope...@li... >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >>> > >>> > >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >> >> >> >> -- >> Curro Fornés > > > > -- > Curro Fornés > -- Regards, Ivan Klyuchnikov. |
From: Curro F. R. <cur...@gm...> - 2011-08-12 10:32:53
|
Hello, I've used that url, and downloaded the repository, but when I try the command "git checkout --track -b USSD origin/USSD" it prompt: fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git How can I select the USSD branch? Thanks, Curro. On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > You can use > git clone git://openbts.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/openbts/openbts > > > > 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: > > Hi, > > Could you please tell me what is the official git repository for OpenBTS? > > Thanks, > > Curro. > > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Curro Fornes Rumbao > > <cur...@gm...> wrote: > >> > >> Thanks. > >> Does that branch support for USRPs UHD? > >> Thank you, > >> Curro. > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm... > > > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> You should use USSD branch from official OpenBTS git repository. > >>> Find short description of the USSD test sequence attached. > >>> Going through the whole test set you'll be able to test almost all > >>> modes of USSD in different states. > >>> > >>> > >>> 2011/8/8 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: > >>> > Dear all, > >>> > > >>> > I'm trying to find documentation on how to test USSD support in > >>> > OpenBTS. > >>> > Could anyone tell me how can I test this feature? > >>> > > >>> > Thanks and best regards, > >>> > Curro. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >>> > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA > >>> > The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. > >>> > Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. > >>> > Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save! > >>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 > >>> > _______________________________________________ > >>> > Openbts-discuss mailing list > >>> > Ope...@li... > >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Regards, > >>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Curro Fornés > > > > > > > > -- > > Curro Fornés > > > > -- > Regards, > Ivan Klyuchnikov. > -- Curro Fornés |
From: Curro F. R. <cur...@gm...> - 2011-08-12 11:12:56
|
Ok, I have compiled USSD branch successfully, but when I run "./OpenBTS", it prompts: OpenBTS: Threads.cpp:78: Mutex::Mutex(): Assertion `s!=0' failed. Aborted That means that USSD branch doesn't support USRP2-UHD device? I have an USRP2 with UHD fpga and firmware images, and I can run perfectly openbts-uhd release... Thanks. On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > You should change directory: > cd openbts > git checkout --track -b USSD origin/USSD > > > 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: > > Hello, > > I've used that url, and downloaded the repository, but when I try the > > command "git checkout --track -b USSD origin/USSD" it prompt: > > fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git > > How can I select the USSD branch? > > Thanks, > > Curro. > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm... > > > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> You can use > >> git clone git://openbts.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/openbts/openbts > >> > >> > >> > >> 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: > >> > Hi, > >> > Could you please tell me what is the official git repository for > >> > OpenBTS? > >> > Thanks, > >> > Curro. > >> > > >> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Curro Fornes Rumbao > >> > <cur...@gm...> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Thanks. > >> >> Does that branch support for USRPs UHD? > >> >> Thank you, > >> >> Curro. > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov > >> >> <klu...@gm...> > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hi, > >> >>> > >> >>> You should use USSD branch from official OpenBTS git repository. > >> >>> Find short description of the USSD test sequence attached. > >> >>> Going through the whole test set you'll be able to test almost all > >> >>> modes of USSD in different states. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> 2011/8/8 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: > >> >>> > Dear all, > >> >>> > > >> >>> > I'm trying to find documentation on how to test USSD support in > >> >>> > OpenBTS. > >> >>> > Could anyone tell me how can I test this feature? > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Thanks and best regards, > >> >>> > Curro. > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> >>> > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA > >> >>> > The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. > >> >>> > Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. > >> >>> > Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & save! > >> >>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 > >> >>> > _______________________________________________ > >> >>> > Openbts-discuss mailing list > >> >>> > Ope...@li... > >> >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Regards, > >> >>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Curro Fornés > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Curro Fornés > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> Regards, > >> Ivan Klyuchnikov. > > > > > > > > -- > > Curro Fornés > > > > -- > Regards, > Ivan Klyuchnikov. > -- Curro Fornés |
From: Alexander C. <ale...@gm...> - 2011-08-12 20:56:12
|
Curro, "Official" OpenBTS repository doesn't support UHD. I believe we should merge USSD branch into UHD repository mainline, as it's working quite well. On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 13:12, Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...> wrote: > Ok, I have compiled USSD branch successfully, but when I run "./OpenBTS", it > prompts: > > OpenBTS: Threads.cpp:78: Mutex::Mutex(): Assertion `s!=0' failed. > Aborted > > > That means that USSD branch doesn't support USRP2-UHD device? I have an > USRP2 with UHD fpga and firmware images, and I can run perfectly openbts-uhd > release... > > Thanks. > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm...> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> You should change directory: >> cd openbts >> git checkout --track -b USSD origin/USSD >> >> >> 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >> > Hello, >> > I've used that url, and downloaded the repository, but when I try the >> > command "git checkout --track -b USSD origin/USSD" it prompt: >> > fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git >> > How can I select the USSD branch? >> > Thanks, >> > Curro. >> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov >> > <klu...@gm...> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> You can use >> >> git clone git://openbts.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/openbts/openbts >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > Could you please tell me what is the official git repository for >> >> > OpenBTS? >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Curro. >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Curro Fornes Rumbao >> >> > <cur...@gm...> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> Does that branch support for USRPs UHD? >> >> >> Thank you, >> >> >> Curro. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov >> >> >> <klu...@gm...> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Hi, >> >> >>> >> >> >>> You should use USSD branch from official OpenBTS git repository. >> >> >>> Find short description of the USSD test sequence attached. >> >> >>> Going through the whole test set you'll be able to test almost all >> >> >>> modes of USSD in different states. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> 2011/8/8 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >> >> >>> > Dear all, >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > I'm trying to find documentation on how to test USSD support in >> >> >>> > OpenBTS. >> >> >>> > Could anyone tell me how can I test this feature? >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > Thanks and best regards, >> >> >>> > Curro. >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >>> > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA >> >> >>> > The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with >> >> >>> > experts. >> >> >>> > Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. >> >> >>> > Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & >> >> >>> > save! >> >> >>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >> >>> > Openbts-discuss mailing list >> >> >>> > Ope...@li... >> >> >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >>> -- >> >> >>> Regards, >> >> >>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Curro Fornés >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Curro Fornés >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Curro Fornés >> > >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Ivan Klyuchnikov. > > > > -- > Curro Fornés > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, > user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take > the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the > tools developers use with it. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Openbts-discuss mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > > -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. |
From: Curro F. <cur...@gm...> - 2011-08-12 21:16:51
|
Ok, that are good news. Please, notify me when you merge both branches. I am very interesting. I will be waiting. Thanks, Curro. Enviado desde mi iPhone El 12/08/2011, a las 22:51, Alexander Chemeris <ale...@gm...> escribió: > Curro, > > "Official" OpenBTS repository doesn't support UHD. I believe we should > merge USSD branch into UHD repository mainline, as it's working quite > well. > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 13:12, Curro Fornes Rumbao > <cur...@gm...> wrote: >> Ok, I have compiled USSD branch successfully, but when I run "./OpenBTS", it >> prompts: >> >> OpenBTS: Threads.cpp:78: Mutex::Mutex(): Assertion `s!=0' failed. >> Aborted >> >> >> That means that USSD branch doesn't support USRP2-UHD device? I have an >> USRP2 with UHD fpga and firmware images, and I can run perfectly openbts-uhd >> release... >> >> Thanks. >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm...> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> You should change directory: >>> cd openbts >>> git checkout --track -b USSD origin/USSD >>> >>> >>> 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >>>> Hello, >>>> I've used that url, and downloaded the repository, but when I try the >>>> command "git checkout --track -b USSD origin/USSD" it prompt: >>>> fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git >>>> How can I select the USSD branch? >>>> Thanks, >>>> Curro. >>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov >>>> <klu...@gm...> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> You can use >>>>> git clone git://openbts.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/openbts/openbts >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> Could you please tell me what is the official git repository for >>>>>> OpenBTS? >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Curro. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Curro Fornes Rumbao >>>>>> <cur...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>> Does that branch support for USRPs UHD? >>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>> Curro. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov >>>>>>> <klu...@gm...> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> You should use USSD branch from official OpenBTS git repository. >>>>>>>> Find short description of the USSD test sequence attached. >>>>>>>> Going through the whole test set you'll be able to test almost all >>>>>>>> modes of USSD in different states. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2011/8/8 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >>>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm trying to find documentation on how to test USSD support in >>>>>>>>> OpenBTS. >>>>>>>>> Could anyone tell me how can I test this feature? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards, >>>>>>>>> Curro. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA >>>>>>>>> The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with >>>>>>>>> experts. >>>>>>>>> Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. >>>>>>>>> Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & >>>>>>>>> save! >>>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Openbts-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>>> Ope...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Curro Fornés >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Curro Fornés >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Curro Fornés >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >> >> >> >> -- >> Curro Fornés >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, >> user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take >> the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the >> tools developers use with it. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Openbts-discuss mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >> >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Alexander Chemeris. |
From: Ivan K. <klu...@gm...> - 2011-08-24 23:12:43
|
Curro, Good news! We added USSD support into UHD repository. git://github.com/chemeris/openbts-uhd.git 2011/8/13 Curro Fornes <cur...@gm...>: > Ok, that are good news. Please, notify me when you merge both branches. I am very interesting. I will be waiting. > > Thanks, > Curro. > > Enviado desde mi iPhone > > El 12/08/2011, a las 22:51, Alexander Chemeris <ale...@gm...> escribió: > >> Curro, >> >> "Official" OpenBTS repository doesn't support UHD. I believe we should >> merge USSD branch into UHD repository mainline, as it's working quite >> well. >> >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 13:12, Curro Fornes Rumbao >> <cur...@gm...> wrote: >>> Ok, I have compiled USSD branch successfully, but when I run "./OpenBTS", it >>> prompts: >>> >>> OpenBTS: Threads.cpp:78: Mutex::Mutex(): Assertion `s!=0' failed. >>> Aborted >>> >>> >>> That means that USSD branch doesn't support USRP2-UHD device? I have an >>> USRP2 with UHD fpga and firmware images, and I can run perfectly openbts-uhd >>> release... >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm...> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> You should change directory: >>>> cd openbts >>>> git checkout --track -b USSD origin/USSD >>>> >>>> >>>> 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> I've used that url, and downloaded the repository, but when I try the >>>>> command "git checkout --track -b USSD origin/USSD" it prompt: >>>>> fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git >>>>> How can I select the USSD branch? >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Curro. >>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov >>>>> <klu...@gm...> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> You can use >>>>>> git clone git://openbts.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/openbts/openbts >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> Could you please tell me what is the official git repository for >>>>>>> OpenBTS? >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Curro. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Curro Fornes Rumbao >>>>>>> <cur...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>> Does that branch support for USRPs UHD? >>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>> Curro. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov >>>>>>>> <klu...@gm...> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You should use USSD branch from official OpenBTS git repository. >>>>>>>>> Find short description of the USSD test sequence attached. >>>>>>>>> Going through the whole test set you'll be able to test almost all >>>>>>>>> modes of USSD in different states. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2011/8/8 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >>>>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to find documentation on how to test USSD support in >>>>>>>>>> OpenBTS. >>>>>>>>>> Could anyone tell me how can I test this feature? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards, >>>>>>>>>> Curro. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>> BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA >>>>>>>>>> The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with >>>>>>>>>> experts. >>>>>>>>>> Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. >>>>>>>>>> Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & >>>>>>>>>> save! >>>>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>> Openbts-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>>>> Ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Curro Fornés >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Curro Fornés >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Curro Fornés >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Regards, >>>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Curro Fornés >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, >>> user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take >>> the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the >>> tools developers use with it. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openbts-discuss mailing list >>> Ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Alexander Chemeris. > -- Regards, Ivan Klyuchnikov |
From: Curro F. <cur...@gm...> - 2011-08-25 05:41:53
|
Hi, Ivan! These are really good news!! I will try to test it in a few days (I'm in travel) and provide you some feedback. Thank you very much!! Enviado desde mi iPhone El 25/08/2011, a las 01:12, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm...> escribió: > Curro, > > Good news! > We added USSD support into UHD repository. > git://github.com/chemeris/openbts-uhd.git > > > 2011/8/13 Curro Fornes <cur...@gm...>: >> Ok, that are good news. Please, notify me when you merge both branches. I am very interesting. I will be waiting. >> >> Thanks, >> Curro. >> >> Enviado desde mi iPhone >> >> El 12/08/2011, a las 22:51, Alexander Chemeris <ale...@gm...> escribió: >> >>> Curro, >>> >>> "Official" OpenBTS repository doesn't support UHD. I believe we should >>> merge USSD branch into UHD repository mainline, as it's working quite >>> well. >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 13:12, Curro Fornes Rumbao >>> <cur...@gm...> wrote: >>>> Ok, I have compiled USSD branch successfully, but when I run "./OpenBTS", it >>>> prompts: >>>> >>>> OpenBTS: Threads.cpp:78: Mutex::Mutex(): Assertion `s!=0' failed. >>>> Aborted >>>> >>>> >>>> That means that USSD branch doesn't support USRP2-UHD device? I have an >>>> USRP2 with UHD fpga and firmware images, and I can run perfectly openbts-uhd >>>> release... >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov <klu...@gm...> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> You should change directory: >>>>> cd openbts >>>>> git checkout --track -b USSD origin/USSD >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> I've used that url, and downloaded the repository, but when I try the >>>>>> command "git checkout --track -b USSD origin/USSD" it prompt: >>>>>> fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git >>>>>> How can I select the USSD branch? >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Curro. >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov >>>>>> <klu...@gm...> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can use >>>>>>> git clone git://openbts.git.sourceforge.net/gitroot/openbts/openbts >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2011/8/12 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> Could you please tell me what is the official git repository for >>>>>>>> OpenBTS? >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Curro. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Curro Fornes Rumbao >>>>>>>> <cur...@gm...> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>> Does that branch support for USRPs UHD? >>>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>>> Curro. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Ivan Kluchnikov >>>>>>>>> <klu...@gm...> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> You should use USSD branch from official OpenBTS git repository. >>>>>>>>>> Find short description of the USSD test sequence attached. >>>>>>>>>> Going through the whole test set you'll be able to test almost all >>>>>>>>>> modes of USSD in different states. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 2011/8/8 Curro Fornes Rumbao <cur...@gm...>: >>>>>>>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm trying to find documentation on how to test USSD support in >>>>>>>>>>> OpenBTS. >>>>>>>>>>> Could anyone tell me how can I test this feature? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards, >>>>>>>>>>> Curro. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>>>> BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA >>>>>>>>>>> The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with >>>>>>>>>>> experts. >>>>>>>>>>> Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. >>>>>>>>>>> Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register early & >>>>>>>>>>> save! >>>>>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-blackberry-1 >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>>>> Openbts-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>>>>> Ope...@li... >>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Curro Fornés >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Curro Fornés >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Curro Fornés >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Ivan Klyuchnikov. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Curro Fornés >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Get a FREE DOWNLOAD! and learn more about uberSVN rich system, >>>> user administration capabilities and model configuration. Take >>>> the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the >>>> tools developers use with it. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Openbts-discuss mailing list >>>> Ope...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Alexander Chemeris. >> > > -- > Regards, > Ivan Klyuchnikov |
From: Fabio P. (naif) <li...@in...> - 2011-08-25 06:33:51
|
We should probably make a 'website' for OpenBTS-UHD with it's own Wiki independent from OpenBTS Project? OpenBTS-UHD it's becoming much more feature-rich and flexible than plain OpenBTS. So maybe we should think in having people concentrating on OpenBTS-UHD, creating documentation and experience in using it rather than spending time with the standard OpenBTS from sourceforge that's almost abbandoned in favour of the OpenBTS commercial edition. Today the real OpenBTS opensource is OpenBTS-UHD. What do you think? -naif On 8/25/11 1:12 AM, Ivan Kluchnikov wrote: > Curro, > > Good news! > We added USSD support into UHD repository. > git://github.com/chemeris/openbts-uhd.git |
From: Kurtis H. <khe...@cs...> - 2011-08-25 07:00:17
|
I personally think that would be really really foolish. While it's true that the mainline branch is rotting and that feature additions are coming from a wider variety of people, that's not a great reason to fork the project completely. David (and the rest of the commercial guys) are still the best source of knowledge about the code and architecture. They're still friendly enough to respond to traffic on this list, helping everyone out. Lastly, the wiki has a lot of information and splitting that is needlessly wasteful. However, it is clear that there's a schism here that needs to be resolved. I can merge my own branch into the UHD branch pretty easily, and I do think it's the most feature complete open-source implementation. At some point, that code does does need to become the mainline branch. When and how that happens is a discussion that needs to happen. On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <li...@in...> wrote: > We should probably make a 'website' for OpenBTS-UHD with it's own Wiki > independent from OpenBTS Project? > > OpenBTS-UHD it's becoming much more feature-rich and flexible than plain > OpenBTS. > > So maybe we should think in having people concentrating on OpenBTS-UHD, > creating documentation and experience in using it rather than spending > time with the standard OpenBTS from sourceforge that's almost abbandoned > in favour of the OpenBTS commercial edition. > > Today the real OpenBTS opensource is OpenBTS-UHD. > > What do you think? > > -naif > > On 8/25/11 1:12 AM, Ivan Kluchnikov wrote: >> Curro, >> >> Good news! >> We added USSD support into UHD repository. >> git://github.com/chemeris/openbts-uhd.git > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K > The only unified storage solution that offers unified management > Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. > Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Openbts-discuss mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > |
From: Fabio P. (naif) <li...@in...> - 2011-08-25 07:16:21
|
If i go on google and search for "OpenBTS" you will find in first page: * http://openbts.sourceforge.net/ - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD * en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBTS - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD * http://openbts.blogspot.com/ - NO mention do OpenBTS-UHD * www.kestrelsp.com/OpenBTS.html - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD * kestrelsignalprocessing.mybigcommerce.com - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD That means that a new adopter, that SHOULD use OpenBTS-UHD, will NOT be able to find OpenBTS-UHD but will first start with plain OpenBTS. Plain OpenBTS is: * more buggy * less features * with less hardware support So, my point is, shouldn't we think about making www.openbts-uhd.org so that a new adopter will be able to start using OpenBTS-UHD instead of the old, plain, OpenBTS public implementation? Currently OpenBTS-UHD doesn't have enough pubblicity and we should recognize that: * OpenBTS on sourceforge is dead * OpenBTS-UHD on github is the new OpenBTS Maybe we should acknolwedge this publicly by allowing new-users to start using UHD rather than the dead project. -naif On 8/25/11 8:59 AM, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: > I personally think that would be really really foolish. While it's > true that the mainline branch is rotting and that feature additions > are coming from a wider variety of people, that's not a great reason > to fork the project completely. David (and the rest of the commercial > guys) are still the best source of knowledge about the code and > architecture. They're still friendly enough to respond to traffic on > this list, helping everyone out. Lastly, the wiki has a lot of > information and splitting that is needlessly wasteful. > > However, it is clear that there's a schism here that needs to be > resolved. I can merge my own branch into the UHD branch pretty easily, > and I do think it's the most feature complete open-source > implementation. At some point, that code does does need to become the > mainline branch. When and how that happens is a discussion that needs > to happen. |
From: Alexander C. <ale...@gm...> - 2011-08-25 07:22:10
|
Fabio, Right now OpenBTS-UHD is still a branch, not fork. So to make people using it, we should just add some more visibility for it to the wiki and to Wikipedia. It would be nice to add mentions to http://openbts.sourceforge.net, but this it not critically necessary yet. Let me rephrase - to get OpenBTS working, people *must* read wiki. And that's the place where we can give them knowledge about OpenBTS-UHD. And we do this already, but in less insistently then we should probably do. On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:16, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <li...@in...> wrote: > If i go on google and search for "OpenBTS" you will find in first page: > > * http://openbts.sourceforge.net/ - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD > * en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBTS - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD > * http://openbts.blogspot.com/ - NO mention do OpenBTS-UHD > * www.kestrelsp.com/OpenBTS.html - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD > * kestrelsignalprocessing.mybigcommerce.com - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD > > That means that a new adopter, that SHOULD use OpenBTS-UHD, will NOT be > able to find OpenBTS-UHD but will first start with plain OpenBTS. > > Plain OpenBTS is: > * more buggy > * less features > * with less hardware support > > So, my point is, shouldn't we think about making www.openbts-uhd.org so > that a new adopter will be able to start using OpenBTS-UHD instead of > the old, plain, OpenBTS public implementation? > > Currently OpenBTS-UHD doesn't have enough pubblicity and we should > recognize that: > * OpenBTS on sourceforge is dead > * OpenBTS-UHD on github is the new OpenBTS > > Maybe we should acknolwedge this publicly by allowing new-users to start > using UHD rather than the dead project. > > -naif > On 8/25/11 8:59 AM, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: >> I personally think that would be really really foolish. While it's >> true that the mainline branch is rotting and that feature additions >> are coming from a wider variety of people, that's not a great reason >> to fork the project completely. David (and the rest of the commercial >> guys) are still the best source of knowledge about the code and >> architecture. They're still friendly enough to respond to traffic on >> this list, helping everyone out. Lastly, the wiki has a lot of >> information and splitting that is needlessly wasteful. >> >> However, it is clear that there's a schism here that needs to be >> resolved. I can merge my own branch into the UHD branch pretty easily, >> and I do think it's the most feature complete open-source >> implementation. At some point, that code does does need to become the >> mainline branch. When and how that happens is a discussion that needs >> to happen. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K > The only unified storage solution that offers unified management > Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. > Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Openbts-discuss mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. |
From: Fabio P. (naif) <li...@in...> - 2011-08-25 07:29:52
|
Ok but: If on "Official" sources we will see mention about OpenBTS-UHD with a clear statement that all opensource contribution should go to OpenBTS-UHD i would be happy. Otherwise i would try to allocate some hour during one night of next week to: * Explain about OpenBTS-UHD on all internet-sources i can find (wikipedia, voip-info, freeswitch, blog comment, etc) * Register a domain about OpenBTS-UHD (i prefer you to do it) * Setup an open-mediawiki providing basic and short, reference about it, at least explaining the situation (that new adopter should go to OpenBTS-UHD) * Use 50$ of free google-ad i have from my hosting to setup OpenBTS google adv At least new users will just have the right reference of what to look at when they search for OpenBTS and they know that: - They need to use OpenBTS-UHD - If they use OpenBTS-UHD they can spend less money I apologies for Trolling, but as already stated in past, i absolutely doesn't like the approach of keeping of dual Open/Commercial handling. As an opensource advocacy troll i am just trying to make the inevitable stuff happening earlier. -naif On 8/25/11 9:21 AM, Alexander Chemeris wrote: > Fabio, > > Right now OpenBTS-UHD is still a branch, not fork. So to make people > using it, we should just add some more visibility for it to the wiki > and to Wikipedia. It would be nice to add mentions to > http://openbts.sourceforge.net, but this it not critically necessary > yet. > > Let me rephrase - to get OpenBTS working, people *must* read wiki. And > that's the place where we can give them knowledge about OpenBTS-UHD. > And we do this already, but in less insistently then we should > probably do. > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:16, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) > <li...@in...> wrote: >> If i go on google and search for "OpenBTS" you will find in first page: >> >> * http://openbts.sourceforge.net/ - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD >> * en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBTS - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD >> * http://openbts.blogspot.com/ - NO mention do OpenBTS-UHD >> * www.kestrelsp.com/OpenBTS.html - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD >> * kestrelsignalprocessing.mybigcommerce.com - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD >> >> That means that a new adopter, that SHOULD use OpenBTS-UHD, will NOT be >> able to find OpenBTS-UHD but will first start with plain OpenBTS. >> >> Plain OpenBTS is: >> * more buggy >> * less features >> * with less hardware support >> >> So, my point is, shouldn't we think about making www.openbts-uhd.org so >> that a new adopter will be able to start using OpenBTS-UHD instead of >> the old, plain, OpenBTS public implementation? >> >> Currently OpenBTS-UHD doesn't have enough pubblicity and we should >> recognize that: >> * OpenBTS on sourceforge is dead >> * OpenBTS-UHD on github is the new OpenBTS >> >> Maybe we should acknolwedge this publicly by allowing new-users to start >> using UHD rather than the dead project. >> >> -naif >> On 8/25/11 8:59 AM, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: >>> I personally think that would be really really foolish. While it's >>> true that the mainline branch is rotting and that feature additions >>> are coming from a wider variety of people, that's not a great reason >>> to fork the project completely. David (and the rest of the commercial >>> guys) are still the best source of knowledge about the code and >>> architecture. They're still friendly enough to respond to traffic on >>> this list, helping everyone out. Lastly, the wiki has a lot of >>> information and splitting that is needlessly wasteful. >>> >>> However, it is clear that there's a schism here that needs to be >>> resolved. I can merge my own branch into the UHD branch pretty easily, >>> and I do think it's the most feature complete open-source >>> implementation. At some point, that code does does need to become the >>> mainline branch. When and how that happens is a discussion that needs >>> to happen. >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K >> The only unified storage solution that offers unified management >> Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. >> Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Openbts-discuss mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >> > > > |
From: Kurtis H. <khe...@cs...> - 2011-08-25 07:34:33
|
Be patient. Everyone is aware that what we have now isn't going to be the final result. I think it's more likely that OpenBTS-UHD is going to be come just "OpenBTS" and then everything you're doing is just going to make googling it even harder. I don't think there are very many people developing it at this point anyhow, and they are all aware of OpenBTS-UHD. Users may not be, but that's where the wiki and the documentation come along. On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <li...@in...> wrote: > Ok but: > > If on "Official" sources we will see mention about OpenBTS-UHD with a > clear statement that all opensource contribution should go to > OpenBTS-UHD i would be happy. > > Otherwise i would try to allocate some hour during one night of next > week to: > > * Explain about OpenBTS-UHD on all internet-sources i can find > (wikipedia, voip-info, freeswitch, blog comment, etc) > > * Register a domain about OpenBTS-UHD (i prefer you to do it) > > * Setup an open-mediawiki providing basic and short, reference about it, > at least explaining the situation (that new adopter should go to > OpenBTS-UHD) > > * Use 50$ of free google-ad i have from my hosting to setup OpenBTS > google adv > > At least new users will just have the right reference of what to look at > when they search for OpenBTS and they know that: > - They need to use OpenBTS-UHD > - If they use OpenBTS-UHD they can spend less money > > I apologies for Trolling, but as already stated in past, i absolutely > doesn't like the approach of keeping of dual Open/Commercial handling. > > As an opensource advocacy troll i am just trying to make the inevitable > stuff happening earlier. > > -naif > > On 8/25/11 9:21 AM, Alexander Chemeris wrote: >> Fabio, >> >> Right now OpenBTS-UHD is still a branch, not fork. So to make people >> using it, we should just add some more visibility for it to the wiki >> and to Wikipedia. It would be nice to add mentions to >> http://openbts.sourceforge.net, but this it not critically necessary >> yet. >> >> Let me rephrase - to get OpenBTS working, people *must* read wiki. And >> that's the place where we can give them knowledge about OpenBTS-UHD. >> And we do this already, but in less insistently then we should >> probably do. >> >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:16, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) >> <li...@in...> wrote: >>> If i go on google and search for "OpenBTS" you will find in first page: >>> >>> * http://openbts.sourceforge.net/ - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD >>> * en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBTS - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD >>> * http://openbts.blogspot.com/ - NO mention do OpenBTS-UHD >>> * www.kestrelsp.com/OpenBTS.html - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD >>> * kestrelsignalprocessing.mybigcommerce.com - NO mention to OpenBTS-UHD >>> >>> That means that a new adopter, that SHOULD use OpenBTS-UHD, will NOT be >>> able to find OpenBTS-UHD but will first start with plain OpenBTS. >>> >>> Plain OpenBTS is: >>> * more buggy >>> * less features >>> * with less hardware support >>> >>> So, my point is, shouldn't we think about making www.openbts-uhd.org so >>> that a new adopter will be able to start using OpenBTS-UHD instead of >>> the old, plain, OpenBTS public implementation? >>> >>> Currently OpenBTS-UHD doesn't have enough pubblicity and we should >>> recognize that: >>> * OpenBTS on sourceforge is dead >>> * OpenBTS-UHD on github is the new OpenBTS >>> >>> Maybe we should acknolwedge this publicly by allowing new-users to start >>> using UHD rather than the dead project. >>> >>> -naif >>> On 8/25/11 8:59 AM, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: >>>> I personally think that would be really really foolish. While it's >>>> true that the mainline branch is rotting and that feature additions >>>> are coming from a wider variety of people, that's not a great reason >>>> to fork the project completely. David (and the rest of the commercial >>>> guys) are still the best source of knowledge about the code and >>>> architecture. They're still friendly enough to respond to traffic on >>>> this list, helping everyone out. Lastly, the wiki has a lot of >>>> information and splitting that is needlessly wasteful. >>>> >>>> However, it is clear that there's a schism here that needs to be >>>> resolved. I can merge my own branch into the UHD branch pretty easily, >>>> and I do think it's the most feature complete open-source >>>> implementation. At some point, that code does does need to become the >>>> mainline branch. When and how that happens is a discussion that needs >>>> to happen. >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K >>> The only unified storage solution that offers unified management >>> Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. >>> Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Openbts-discuss mailing list >>> Ope...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >>> >> >> >> > > |
From: Fabio P. (naif) <li...@in...> - 2011-08-25 07:47:24
|
On 8/25/11 9:33 AM, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: > Be patient. Everyone is aware that what we have now isn't going to be > the final result. I think it's more likely that OpenBTS-UHD is going > to be come just "OpenBTS" and then everything you're doing is just > going to make googling it even harder. I don't think there are very > many people developing it at this point anyhow, and they are all aware > of OpenBTS-UHD. Users may not be, but that's where the wiki and the > documentation come along. I am not a developer but a User and an OpenBTS user is someone with System Administration / Networking skills that would like for hobby or for some precise scope setup a GSM BTS. To do that that User need to know few information: - Which hardware to buy - Which software to use I am just saying that today, a new User (not a developer, a user like me), need to know which hardware to buy and which software to use without making mistakes. Because currently with OpenBTS-UHD you can buy less-expensive hardware and have more featured system, i'd just like Users to know what they could buy and which software they can use without digging too much with Wiki/MailingList making expensive mistakes. To do that we must be very clear in "communicating" how the OpenBTS environment/ecosystem works, which are the pieces, what to use, what not to use. Whenever i show my BTS to friends of mine and they approach OpenBTS in looking around stuff, they always ask me "what the hell, i don't understand, what i need to get and what i need to use?" . -naif |
From: Alexander C. <ale...@gm...> - 2011-08-25 07:55:20
|
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:47, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <li...@in...> wrote: > On 8/25/11 9:33 AM, Kurtis Heimerl wrote: >> Be patient. Everyone is aware that what we have now isn't going to be >> the final result. I think it's more likely that OpenBTS-UHD is going >> to be come just "OpenBTS" and then everything you're doing is just >> going to make googling it even harder. I don't think there are very >> many people developing it at this point anyhow, and they are all aware >> of OpenBTS-UHD. Users may not be, but that's where the wiki and the >> documentation come along. > > I am not a developer but a User and an OpenBTS user is someone with > System Administration / Networking skills that would like for hobby or > for some precise scope setup a GSM BTS. > > To do that that User need to know few information: > - Which hardware to buy > - Which software to use > > I am just saying that today, a new User (not a developer, a user like > me), need to know which hardware to buy and which software to use > without making mistakes. > > Because currently with OpenBTS-UHD you can buy less-expensive hardware > and have more featured system, i'd just like Users to know what they > could buy and which software they can use without digging too much with > Wiki/MailingList making expensive mistakes. > > To do that we must be very clear in "communicating" how the OpenBTS > environment/ecosystem works, which are the pieces, what to use, what not > to use. Exactly. And this doesn't require us to make a separate website and split forces. Just update the wiki (and other sources like Wikipedia) and you're done. -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. |
From: Fabio P. (naif) <li...@in...> - 2011-08-25 08:22:58
|
On 8/25/11 9:54 AM, Alexander Chemeris wrote: > > Exactly. And this doesn't require us to make a separate website and > split forces. Just update the wiki (and other sources like Wikipedia) > and you're done. > Can we get an official, shared commitment also from "OpenBTS.org" website, documenting about OpenBTS-UHD and linking to them? If "OpenBTS" "project" would clearly endorse OpenBTS-UHD then it's ok, they will clearly state that there is OpenBTS-Commercial and OpenBTS-UHD and that OpenSource should got to OpenBTS-UHD. Until now there will be a unfair advantage for a commercial iniative that leverage the effort/support from an opensource community. And that's what i don't like, that's what confuse people and what let people to make wrong assumption. I totally understand that we should "avoid a fork", but in order to do it we need to have the official project page (OpenBTS.org) having a clear position on the OpenSource de-facto fork that's OpenBTS-UHD. -naif |
From: <da...@ra...> - 2011-08-25 08:57:34
|
Fabio - I've been following this conversation but have not had much chance to participate. I will stand up though to say that nothing beyond a few bug fixes have gone into the commercial release so far without the authors getting paid for their work or for their copyright assignments. Given the history of this project, the idea that we (Range Networks and Kestrel) are getting work for free from anyone is absurd. We require a CLA for contributions to the official release for legal reasons, and we are willing to pay reasonable fees to obtain code under that CLA. -- David Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <li...@in...> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:22:50 To: Alexander Chemeris<ale...@gm...> Cc: <ope...@li...> Subject: Re: [Openbts-discuss] OpenBTS-UHD aka Open-source OpenBTS mainline. On 8/25/11 9:54 AM, Alexander Chemeris wrote: > > Exactly. And this doesn't require us to make a separate website and > split forces. Just update the wiki (and other sources like Wikipedia) > and you're done. > Can we get an official, shared commitment also from "OpenBTS.org" website, documenting about OpenBTS-UHD and linking to them? If "OpenBTS" "project" would clearly endorse OpenBTS-UHD then it's ok, they will clearly state that there is OpenBTS-Commercial and OpenBTS-UHD and that OpenSource should got to OpenBTS-UHD. Until now there will be a unfair advantage for a commercial iniative that leverage the effort/support from an opensource community. And that's what i don't like, that's what confuse people and what let people to make wrong assumption. I totally understand that we should "avoid a fork", but in order to do it we need to have the official project page (OpenBTS.org) having a clear position on the OpenSource de-facto fork that's OpenBTS-UHD. -naif ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K The only unified storage solution that offers unified management Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Openbts-discuss mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss |
From: Fabio P. (naif) <li...@in...> - 2011-08-25 11:40:37
|
On 8/25/11 10:57 AM, da...@ra... wrote: > Fabio - > > I've been following this conversation but have not had much chance to participate. I will stand up though to say that nothing beyond a few bug fixes have gone into the commercial release so far without the authors getting paid for their work or for their copyright assignments. Given the history of this project, the idea that we (Range Networks and Kestrel) are getting work for free from anyone is absurd. We require a CLA for contributions to the official release for legal reasons, and we are willing to pay reasonable fees to obtain code under that CLA. I remember that the commercial release of OpenBTS have much important features such as Multi-ARFCN that are not commited in OpenSource. Projects like PJSIP.org follow a dual-licensed open/commercial licensing, however they commit ALL code to the opensource base without making a feature discrimination between commercial and open-code. That's the main stuff that i don't like and that i consider unfair approach with opensource community. Dual-licensing means that you are providing everything to the community and in exchange you get people being happy in signing contribution agreements. You give everything opensource, you get contribution agreement signed without forks of the project. That's how PJSIP.org dual-licensing approach works. You should really consider it, if it's not too late... -naif |
From: Patrick <va...@gm...> - 2011-08-25 13:16:18
|
hi that's also my problem.... now, i'm a little confused which hw/sw i need for create my bts working... pat >To do that that User need to know few information: >- Which hardware to buy >- Which software to use .... >To do that we must be very clear in "communicating" how the OpenBTS >environment/ecosystem works, which are the pieces, what to use, what not >to use. Openbts-discuss mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > |
From: Alexander C. <ale...@gm...> - 2011-08-25 07:17:17
|
Kurtis, thank you for your write-up. I have the same position - we shouldn't fork completely, as it will have very negative impact for the whole project. David's comments are not very often, but sometimes they provide knowledge which is hard to another way. Furthermore, there is still a hope that Range will open-source some of their code before it will be independently re-implemented in open-source. But what I agree, is that UHD version is the new mainline right now and people contributing should contribute to it instead of "official" version. At least until "official" version becomes live and supported again. On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:59, Kurtis Heimerl <khe...@cs...> wrote: > I personally think that would be really really foolish. While it's > true that the mainline branch is rotting and that feature additions > are coming from a wider variety of people, that's not a great reason > to fork the project completely. David (and the rest of the commercial > guys) are still the best source of knowledge about the code and > architecture. They're still friendly enough to respond to traffic on > this list, helping everyone out. Lastly, the wiki has a lot of > information and splitting that is needlessly wasteful. > > However, it is clear that there's a schism here that needs to be > resolved. I can merge my own branch into the UHD branch pretty easily, > and I do think it's the most feature complete open-source > implementation. At some point, that code does does need to become the > mainline branch. When and how that happens is a discussion that needs > to happen. > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) > <li...@in...> wrote: >> We should probably make a 'website' for OpenBTS-UHD with it's own Wiki >> independent from OpenBTS Project? >> >> OpenBTS-UHD it's becoming much more feature-rich and flexible than plain >> OpenBTS. >> >> So maybe we should think in having people concentrating on OpenBTS-UHD, >> creating documentation and experience in using it rather than spending >> time with the standard OpenBTS from sourceforge that's almost abbandoned >> in favour of the OpenBTS commercial edition. >> >> Today the real OpenBTS opensource is OpenBTS-UHD. >> >> What do you think? >> >> -naif >> >> On 8/25/11 1:12 AM, Ivan Kluchnikov wrote: >>> Curro, >>> >>> Good news! >>> We added USSD support into UHD repository. >>> git://github.com/chemeris/openbts-uhd.git >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K >> The only unified storage solution that offers unified management >> Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. >> Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Openbts-discuss mailing list >> Ope...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K > The only unified storage solution that offers unified management > Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. > Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Openbts-discuss mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > -- Regards, Alexander Chemeris. |
From: <dbu...@jc...> - 2011-08-25 09:01:48
|
Kurtis - Thanks. No surprise, but I agree. Most of these feature additions are already coming from people with CLAs and write access to the mainline git repo. So instead of branching all over the place, it would seem no harder for people to put their changes into the mainline. -- David Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry -----Original Message----- From: Kurtis Heimerl <khe...@cs...> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 23:59:30 To: Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)<li...@in...> Cc: <ope...@li...> Subject: Re: [Openbts-discuss] OpenBTS USSD support I personally think that would be really really foolish. While it's true that the mainline branch is rotting and that feature additions are coming from a wider variety of people, that's not a great reason to fork the project completely. David (and the rest of the commercial guys) are still the best source of knowledge about the code and architecture. They're still friendly enough to respond to traffic on this list, helping everyone out. Lastly, the wiki has a lot of information and splitting that is needlessly wasteful. However, it is clear that there's a schism here that needs to be resolved. I can merge my own branch into the UHD branch pretty easily, and I do think it's the most feature complete open-source implementation. At some point, that code does does need to become the mainline branch. When and how that happens is a discussion that needs to happen. On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <li...@in...> wrote: > We should probably make a 'website' for OpenBTS-UHD with it's own Wiki > independent from OpenBTS Project? > > OpenBTS-UHD it's becoming much more feature-rich and flexible than plain > OpenBTS. > > So maybe we should think in having people concentrating on OpenBTS-UHD, > creating documentation and experience in using it rather than spending > time with the standard OpenBTS from sourceforge that's almost abbandoned > in favour of the OpenBTS commercial edition. > > Today the real OpenBTS opensource is OpenBTS-UHD. > > What do you think? > > -naif > > On 8/25/11 1:12 AM, Ivan Kluchnikov wrote: >> Curro, >> >> Good news! >> We added USSD support into UHD repository. >> git://github.com/chemeris/openbts-uhd.git > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K > The only unified storage solution that offers unified management > Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. > Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Openbts-discuss mailing list > Ope...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EMC VNX: the world's simplest storage, starting under $10K The only unified storage solution that offers unified management Up to 160% more powerful than alternatives and 25% more efficient. Guaranteed. http://p.sf.net/sfu/emc-vnx-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Openbts-discuss mailing list Ope...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbts-discuss |