From: <g.r...@te...> - 2012-11-30 08:35:36
|
Hi, Beginners question: which usrp will be the best to use with openbts? the n210 version or the b100 ? kind regards |
From: Kurtis H. <khe...@cs...> - 2012-11-30 09:21:10
|
The B100 is probably the easiest, though the signal produced isn't great. On Friday, November 30, 2012, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Beginners question: which usrp will be the best to use with openbts? > > the n210 version or the b100 ? > > > > kind regards > > > |
From: <g.r...@te...> - 2012-11-30 12:19:55
|
what is the best than? ----- Oorspronkelijk e-mail ----- Van: "Kurtis Heimerl" <khe...@cs...> Aan: "g roelant" <g.r...@te...> Cc: ope...@li... Verzonden: Vrijdag 30 november 2012 10:21:00 Onderwerp: Re: [Openbts-discuss] ettus USRP N210 or B100 ?? The B100 is probably the easiest, though the signal produced isn't great. On Friday, November 30, 2012, wrote: Hi, Beginners question: which usrp will be the best to use with openbts? the n210 version or the b100 ? kind regards |
From: Kurtis H. <khe...@cs...> - 2012-11-30 12:53:49
|
Best how? On Friday, November 30, 2012, wrote: > what is the best than? > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *Van: *"Kurtis Heimerl" <khe...@cs... <javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', 'khe...@cs...');>> > *Aan: *"g roelant" <g.r...@te... <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'g.r...@te...');>> > *Cc: *ope...@li... <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'ope...@li...');> > *Verzonden: *Vrijdag 30 november 2012 10:21:00 > *Onderwerp: *Re: [Openbts-discuss] ettus USRP N210 or B100 ?? > > The B100 is probably the easiest, though the signal produced isn't great. > > On Friday, November 30, 2012, wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Beginners question: which usrp will be the best to use with openbts? >> >> the n210 version or the b100 ? >> >> >> >> kind regards >> >> >> > > |
From: <g.r...@te...> - 2012-11-30 15:28:36
|
Best in Any way... What are you guy's using? ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: Kurtis Heimerl <khe...@cs...> Aan: g roelant <g.r...@te...> Cc: Kurtis Heimerl <khe...@cs...>, ope...@li... Verzonden: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:53:40 +0100 (CET) Onderwerp: Re: [Openbts-discuss] ettus USRP N210 or B100 ?? Best how? On Friday, November 30, 2012, wrote: > what is the best than? > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > *Van: *"Kurtis Heimerl" <khe...@cs... <javascript:_e({}, > 'cvml', 'khe...@cs...');>> > *Aan: *"g roelant" <g.r...@te... <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'g.r...@te...');>> > *Cc: *ope...@li... <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'ope...@li...');> > *Verzonden: *Vrijdag 30 november 2012 10:21:00 > *Onderwerp: *Re: [Openbts-discuss] ettus USRP N210 or B100 ?? > > The B100 is probably the easiest, though the signal produced isn't great. > > On Friday, November 30, 2012, wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Beginners question: which usrp will be the best to use with openbts? >> >> the n210 version or the b100 ? >> >> >> >> kind regards >> >> >> > > |
From: Kurtis H. <khe...@cs...> - 2012-11-30 21:03:30
|
I use a B100 for desktop testing and a range networks radio for deployments. On Saturday, December 1, 2012, wrote: > Best in Any way... > What are you guy's using? > > ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- > Van: Kurtis Heimerl <khe...@cs... <javascript:;>> > Aan: g roelant <g.r...@te... <javascript:;>> > Cc: Kurtis Heimerl <khe...@cs... <javascript:;>>, > ope...@li... <javascript:;> > Verzonden: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 13:53:40 +0100 (CET) > Onderwerp: Re: [Openbts-discuss] ettus USRP N210 or B100 ?? > > Best how? > > On Friday, November 30, 2012, wrote: > > > what is the best than? > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > *Van: *"Kurtis Heimerl" <khe...@cs... <javascript:;><javascript:_e({}, > > 'cvml', 'khe...@cs... <javascript:;>');>> > > *Aan: *"g roelant" <g.r...@te... <javascript:;><javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > > 'g.r...@te... <javascript:;>');>> > > *Cc: *ope...@li... <javascript:;><javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > > 'ope...@li... <javascript:;>');> > > *Verzonden: *Vrijdag 30 november 2012 10:21:00 > > *Onderwerp: *Re: [Openbts-discuss] ettus USRP N210 or B100 ?? > > > > The B100 is probably the easiest, though the signal produced isn't great. > > > > On Friday, November 30, 2012, wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >> > >> Beginners question: which usrp will be the best to use with openbts? > >> > >> the n210 version or the b100 ? > >> > >> > >> > >> kind regards > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > |
From: Ralph A. S. d. <ra...@sc...> - 2012-11-30 13:28:23
|
What are the issues you are seeing regarding the signal? The internal clock is crap, USB is not the best connection for a kind of "realtime system", and I preferred the USRP1 due to the fact that it can hold two TRX boards, but otherwise I can't see any drawbacks. The daughterboards anyway are the same through all series, and the ADC resolution should be more enough for the relative simple GSM modulation scheme. So, when OpenBTS is the one and only job the little beast has to do and money does not grow on the trees in the backyard, I would go for the B100 without hesitation. Ralph. From: Kurtis Heimerl [mailto:khe...@cs...] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:21 AM To: g.r...@te... Cc: ope...@li... Subject: Re: [Openbts-discuss] ettus USRP N210 or B100 ?? The B100 is probably the easiest, though the signal produced isn't great. On Friday, November 30, 2012, wrote: Hi, Beginners question: which usrp will be the best to use with openbts? the n210 version or the b100 ? kind regards |